Juliate

34 ms·

511.
by Juliate 3y ago
> Anyone who understood the intent and philosophy of the GPL license understood this as a bogus and unethical argument. I disagree here. The idea, intent, philosophy is one (crucial) thing, the resulting practical artefact (here the lice
512.
by Juliate 3y ago
It would greatly improve by some text revisions: "my code", "We", on a generic page without clear authorship or object, on a dedicated subdomain, on a hosting domain, without a signature or contact or kind of option for
513.
by Juliate 3y ago
> If AI is to [...] This fact alone crushes any sympathy across borders. But who will power, own and regulate AI in your opinion? If AI is to have any impact on society, it's just a tech, it will just move the lines, people will mov
514.
by Juliate 3y ago
> But there will never be any solidarity between say ... There is international solidarity between people, because they understand each other, are in the same classes or have the same ideas/ideologies. Between far-right people, acro
515.
by Juliate 3y ago
> Were workers happy in those countries? Likely no. But that's not the point. :) Was there solidarity among workers internationally? Yes. Because they're in the same class in society.
516.
by Juliate 3y ago
I totally accept this, I think I would (re)act the same. But not without being still conflicted: this is kind of a privatisation of security. What should be available and enforced for everyone (security of people and things) is abdicated by
517.
by Juliate 3y ago
You did very well stating upfront your experience (which _is_ valuable, even if you didn’t enjoyed your past 4 years, you did learn stuff, believe me. Your skills do transfer onto different jobs. Once in your new job, don’t be so much scare
518.
by Juliate 3y ago
Over the periods fishes evolved, their habitat wasn’t under heavy attack/occupation, neither were their populations hunted at the current scale.
519.
by Juliate 3y ago
You'd have to demonstrate/convince that the particulars of your recording are original and novel. If there was any prior equivalent, you might not be able to sustain your claim.
520.
by Juliate 4y ago
Well noted, makes sense this way, thanks for the feedback!
521.
by Juliate 4y ago
I am a bit confused: are we going to get more similar posts (which is tangent to some proselytism, under the premise of well wishing?) for each and every religious faith major event around the globe? I am saying this as a former believer (a
522.
by Juliate 4y ago
What I take out of this, is rather that the news are (at this point) more the ruminating, focusing on the bad/worst of humanity, rather than the uplifting/inspiring. In that, it's addictive, and/but not useful nor effici
523.
by Juliate 4y ago
1) that also means companies will have to lower their prices too, because of increased competition - it's not going to just replace jobs - and there's no decent reason shareholders should get most of the value here. Unless there&#
524.
by Juliate 4y ago
> "the most ambitious challenges attract the smartest people" Whose ambition? Smart how? For what outcome? For who? Would that be even efficient? (there are many other issues to "panic" over other than AI)
525.
by Juliate 4y ago
[citation needed] Especially because left/right dichotomy smells particularly anecdotal here.
526.
by Juliate 4y ago
How you speak (to someone [or something, in this case]) also imprints on your self: being polite to someone is being polite on yourself. In the case of a tool, it may definitely change your perspective on it. This is also valid for physical
527.
by Juliate 4y ago
Precisely, I don't know. I would not expect such a specific group, or any other, to significantly differ (might be a sampling issue, or something with a reason). Hence my question, but that may also be a translation issue. One could fo
528.
by Juliate 4y ago
Why strange?
529.
by Juliate 4y ago
Thanks for the other discussion! > if it wants to actually kill someone, it has to interface with the real world And researchers already tested for GPT-4 to be put online. That is already being interfaced with the real world, through the
530.
by Juliate 4y ago
> My solution comes from Stephenson and Doctorow: distribute the technology freely. The sooner everyone has access to the incredible propagandic power of these technologies, the sooner we can develop counter measures. I find this still a
531.
by Juliate 4y ago
True. It more looks like a complement than an counterargument?
532.
by Juliate 4y ago
It’s a concept at least as old as modern democracies and individual rights, and it’s likely not a coincidence. That it’s been abused by corporate entities is another matter. The fact that some famous musicians sell their whole catalog to co
533.
by Juliate 4y ago
Not necessarily different, but the day software tech people get treated as disposable rather than rare (as they are very much today), it’s gonna be a rather … peculiar cultural shift to experience (for people, the industry, states).
534.
by Juliate 4y ago
Eventually, yes. But somehow regulations will also rise that will require a very crude and explicit marking of what is genuinely human/natural from what is computer-generated (with taxes amply applied to it to make up for the performan
535.
by Juliate 4y ago
Consolidation may not be inevitable, but it did happen on so many previous innovation waves (steam, electricity, telegraph, telephone, automobile, aviation beginnings were full of small, growing, competitive ideas and ventures too). It come
536.
by Juliate 4y ago
Too late, LinkedIn has already become kind of a Facebook+Twitter mixture now…
537.
by Juliate 4y ago
But when everyone doesn’t live in the same spot on earth, it becomes tricky. Time for living things is primarily based on the course of the sun above their heads. Hence timezones to adjust between the local needs, and the worldwide synchron
538.
by Juliate 4y ago
« Some companies » : bullshit, irrelevant ones or not-too-proud ones? What actual use cases? With what actual results? The backlash over companies that will behave poorly towards their customers or partners (even employees) is likely to be
539.
by Juliate 4y ago
They’re not telling, they are paraphrasing what they’ve been input with.
540.
by Juliate 4y ago
Definitely. But we are all to be « haunted » by our own experience if we are to live, and to have to know how/when not to take it into account (which in itself is some form of experience too).

More ›