Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
JanneVee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Then you are in the wrong space of programming if you want to continue working. AI will improve over time and the scenario I described is going to be a thing of the past, but it won't go as fast as people expect because it is a questio
62.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
> I still think you will have to be a good developer to understand if the solution you get is good, but is that even going to matter when you can just ask again and try again? I think there will be lots of code bases that no-one really u
63.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I remember that humor from Silicon Snake Oil, it was a wonderful book. I think back to it when working in an industry where everyone takes a tractable problem and makes it intractable for "job security".
64.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I'm afraid that I don't accept the apology. You are taking money from my organization, making it hard for my organization to administrate the users you ask money for because it is not enough seats and then communicate something th
65.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Wait what? You don't seem to realize the Cyberpunk dystopia we are living in? Yes it is amazing that we can order online! But having a company that is a near monopoly search and decides what is 'true' benefits by an otiose 15
66.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Yes, I feel so much better after quitting reddit. Erased all my users after I cleaned out my comments. I don't engage so often in comments anymore except for the occasional HN comment I drop! Best move for my mental wellbeing recently.
67.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
This is the main excuse for companies when they get flak for their anti-consumer behaviour, that the comments on the internet don't matter. It is somehow rooted in emotions and/or irrational status seeking through imagined Interne
68.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
So we should be flat out denying the existence chattel slavery in some parts Africa and Asia still because it is not a part of the modern global economy? The essence of what I feel is wrong about the modern discussion around exploitation of
69.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Chattel slavery still exists around the world, why aren't they the richer than the places where chattel slavery is outlawed? Where ever machines replaced human labor slavery has been outlawed and is richer than the places where labor i
70.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Well he might be a post modernist in the literal sense but as the entry point to this discussion is about power structures on how they might have gotten it right. But what I see is people having things backwards with e.g. the corruption of
71.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
What do you need citation for? Why can't my observation about the discussion from adherents of post modern philosophy today be basis for discussion on hacker news? Or do your thought need citation for your thoughts? Sure my thoughts a
72.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
> They're right about the power struggle, but only because to them everything is a power struggle and we all just happen to be in one caused by this discorporeality from tech. I don't know if I believe that. The problem with th
73.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Because everyone is prentending that they need to be infinetly scalable like the FAANGs, exacerbated by Cloud providers marketing spiel. In reality nobody knows how to build distributed systems but everybody needs to build them as resume fo
74.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I see it once in a while comments out there on the internet(even here) flat out denying that companies have people employed that serve no purpose for the company. The reasoning goes like that economic incentive they would either never been
75.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Part of the post is resignation to the fact that the culture shift is permanent. That is the whole connotation "Eternal September" you can't tell the new users how to "Mastodon" to protect the old culture.
76.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
The problem is that I read the author's blog post much more charitably than the comment I'm replying too. For me it is not overly sensitive. He used mastodon for other things than bring attention to themself, that is the currency
77.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
It is a quick comment by me that I didn't spend much effort on. So I'll rephrase it: Mastodon is not "Twitter" and a bunch of "Twitter users" showed up triggering a change in culture of Mastodon to be more like
78.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
That is blatantly just missing the point of the complaint. Mastodon is not "social media" and a bunch of "social media users" showed up triggering a change in culture of Mastodon to be more like the thing the author opte
79.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I have gone long periods of the last decade of just skimming the headlines and being very selective of what news I consume. I try to stick to news that is something that directly affects me. Then there are periods that I look at news more t
80.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I read through the guidelines. I'm firmly in the camp that the fundamental ideas of the guidelines stem from ideas that deny the existence of objective shared reality. But science is and always has been the pursuit of knowledge of obje
81.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Well it is a good message but a tad poorly researched and underdeveloped thoughts. Being stuck in a "compulsion loop" online is not healthy for your mind. It doesn't matter if it is Twitter, TikTok or even Hacker News. What I
82.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
It is things like this that has reduced the usefulness of wikipedia for me personally. I wasn't aware of the whole "notability deletionists" before I tried to look up the Rockstar programming language when discussing esoteric
83.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
"It is how the system works", is not getting it... Twitter is used by a minority yet it supposedly captures significant political power. It is really hard to explain it to someone who doesn't care how supposed work and think
84.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
From the article: > Since then, the site’s importance to global politics and culture has grown, and a long-lasting outage could even have had a material effect on the Conservative party’s leadership election, where runners and riders hav
85.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
To quote myself "Its sole purpose is to prolong engagement...", so we are on the same page here. But there is downside to this, it often hijacks your dopamine system and can be addicting. It doesn't only do that, occasionally
86.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
> But you understand that technology have social consequences? Yes that is why I started of this whole thread with: > "The algorithm" is irredeemable. My personal opinion is formed by tweets that where not about the social o
87.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
I know that they aren't magical. But the intent is to present engaging content to you so you stick around longer so you can be datamined and targeted with sponsored content. The issue I take with it is that there is a consequence almos
88.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
Well the problem I'm trying to point out is that yes it is a fundamentally human problem. The problem is that a machine is amplifying this. There is a curation of content that is personal that may lock you harder in the filter bubble t
89.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
The word here is "could"... It can and has been used for outcomes that hasn't favored the users interests. And that is in my view a worse outcome than status quo.
90.
▲
by
JanneVee
4y ago
The problem is that I tried to put myself into a software development filter bubble but yet the herd mentality and polarization bled through the filter. It is not a single issue of "algorithm = bad". It is multiple issues intersec
More ›