JanneVee

13 ms·

91.
by JanneVee 4y ago
"The algorithm" is irredeemable. Its sole purpose is to prolong engagement so they can sneak ads in front of your eyeballs. Open sourcing it would not change its purpose and intended design. The design does not take into account t
92.
by JanneVee 4y ago
Because "bad faith communication" is about the talking head on the TV sowing doubt in your mind on complex issues. It is oil company shills telling you that climate change is not man made and it is Malthusian environmental activis
93.
by JanneVee 5y ago
Yes but my point isn't about this content in particular. My reply was a little facetious. > Is the Youtube algorithm directing people to make vaguely fascist feeling, "bring back the good old days", 'kids today'
94.
by JanneVee 5y ago
I never claimed that it was 'wholesome' that is something you filled in. I'm pointing out that the your analysis is flawed that you are trying to pin ideological label on a "scottish alcoholic" and conflating that s
95.
by JanneVee 5y ago
I'm just replying to the notion of that the critique has a undertone of fascist feeling. The comment is somehow anchored in that any critique of modern movies is reactionary and does not have any merit of its own. What I'm trying
96.
by JanneVee 5y ago
So my affinity and longing for simpler times with 8-bit computers can be used to manipulate me for someones ideological purposes? There is a huge gap between someone saying 'it used to be better' and the primrose path to embracing
97.
by JanneVee 5y ago
Nostalgia that is the most natural thing in the world is defined as 'fascist' now?
98.
by JanneVee 5y ago
Yes you can enjoy the game below 2000 if you play people at the same level as you. When you blunder the opponent will occasionally blunder back at below 2000. I've had really enjoyable games where I got to make strategic decisions like
99.
by JanneVee 5y ago
The number of financial scam ads I have been targeted with is staggering. Youtube presented me with an ad that was ~24 minutes long with an investment strategy that was supposed to make you a $1000 a day. Facebook is the same thing with cry
100.
by JanneVee 5y ago
I don't know how go changed. But as for chess the tournament play at the master level have insane deep opening preparation done before with computers. They play preparation game where they try to guess what lines the opponent checked a
101.
by JanneVee 5y ago
The Internet did no such thing. It just amplified human propensities. But if you see stupid people on the Internet constantly you should reconsider what for and how you use the Internet.
102.
by JanneVee 5y ago
Accessible does not always mean usable. That is the whole rub of the submitted link. The developer has better UX for blind users and the reviewers discard that as a criteria.
103.
by JanneVee 5y ago
Perhaps or there is something else brewing behind the scenes. https://quillette.com/2021/06/27/podcast-155-heather-mac-don... we might never know what is really happening.
104.
by JanneVee 5y ago
No I was rather inquiring if it was performative erasure of someones experience or just some kind of jealousy.
105.
by JanneVee 5y ago
So your response to a person with brown skin say that their experience doesn't matter? Why doesn't it matter because you read that they where lucky or that you experienced something different?
106.
by JanneVee 5y ago
I'm really suprised, it has spread around the whole western world. There is not enough pushback on the foundational philosophical flaws of this phenomena. The biggest flaw of "wokeness" it doesn't try to combat the human
107.
by JanneVee 5y ago
So what would the process be for example if a unwitting parent or relative has pictures of a victim on their iPhone that is perceptually similar of their loved one being molested at day care something like that?
108.
by JanneVee 5y ago
> We don't operate our universities on the heckler's veto. I've seen a few videos from various Universities where invited speakers are shouted down because of supposed wrong views. But then it isn't the heckler's
109.
by JanneVee 6y ago
There is a difference between accruing technical debt on a legacy system is one thing, that is something that almost never can avoid. The other is to panic hire someone when the proverbial shit hits the fan is another story. That is the big
110.
by JanneVee 6y ago
As I see it that this was a organizational culture failure where he tries to explain it with a technical debt problem. I see the fingerprints of almost feudal organization structure the other aspects when I first read about the New Jerseys
111.
by JanneVee 6y ago
>> That’s the drop-off you experience at the lower price levels - there’s nothing between “This is a tiny but acceptable apartment” and “Slum apartments in stab-ville”. >I don't think this is true, and why would it be? Unless
112.
by JanneVee 6y ago
At some point these cultural sensitivities will cross a line where a majority of people will go "enough" and create a backlash. I do believe that somewhere in the future we wont get these content warnings even when they would be a
113.
by JanneVee 6y ago
Just because some opinion shows "top rated" it doesn't necessarily mean that "news reader" audience like to be treated the same way. Right? Somewhere I would like to have a little more qualification to that a "
114.
by JanneVee 6y ago
> The final reason for the turn against objectivity is commercial. The shift away from partisanship a century ago was driven partly by advertisers. Today, as ad revenues leak away to search engines and social networks, newspapers have co
115.
by JanneVee 6y ago
Yet I don't miss any refactoring tools in VS for F#. It is a simpler language and has some nice design affordances that makes refactoring superfluous in some cases. I have a small story around it. A couple of years back I had the nasty
116.
by JanneVee 7y ago
How about turning autocommit off?
117.
by JanneVee 8y ago
Well even outside of Silicon Valley the question changes to “why aren’t you a manager yet?”! Annnoying ageist question, despite that my experience is worth the money. You just need to avoid companies that doesn’t value it correctly.
118.
by JanneVee 8y ago
Sad to see that the public discourse has moved away from point 5 with the freedom to argue. To the point of that I'm afraid of giving examples.
119.
by JanneVee 10y ago
I'm not from the US. I live in Sweden where it isn't as common with people working two jobs. But sure go ahead continue patching society because it is hard to solve the actual problem. So I'm not arguing for a hands off gover
120.
by JanneVee 10y ago
So society doesn't need to fix the "two jobs" problem but society needs to help with parenting instead including filtering porn of the interwebs?

More ›