IBM

95 ms·

901.
by IBM 12y ago
I don't understand your comment. How else would you compensate them when their business model is designing the processors to be licensed to others and not building it?
902.
UnGoogle Me: The Case for Scrubbing Search Results(businessweek.com)
1 points by IBM 12y ago|0 comments
903.
Snowden Is The Kind of Guy I Used to Recruit–in Russia(politico.com)
4 points by IBM 12y ago|1 comments
904.
by IBM 12y ago
I wouldn't put too much stock into audiophile opinions anyway (speaking as someone who got sucked into the community at head-fi.org before I realized how much bullshit there is). >Scientific claims to knowledge and the uses of techn
905.
by IBM 12y ago
You're not missing anything, don't worry. I was a former audiophile spending way too much money like everyone else at Head-fi.org Then I realized the collective delusion everyone was living in when I forced myself to double-blind
906.
by IBM 12y ago
Unlike most Silicon Valley acquisitions, Beats has profits. They sell high-margin headphones with 60% market share of the over-$100 headphone market. Apple is going to be getting into wearables, and this is the original wearable. They'
907.
Why Beats Music Matters(macstories.net)
2 points by IBM 12y ago|0 comments
908.
Tesla Q1 earnings report [pdf](files.shareholder.com)
55 points by IBM 12y ago|49 comments
909.
Wal-Mart Notches Web Win Against Rival Amazon(webcache.googleusercontent.com)
1 points by IBM 12y ago|0 comments
910.
by IBM 12y ago
Chromebooks aren't just competing with laptops, they also have to compete with tablets. Consumers/education/business are much more likely to buy iPads over Chromebooks because of the much better software ecosystem. Most of Go
911.
by IBM 12y ago
It's a repeated meme that Apple should "stop litigating and get back to innovating" as if the organization is incapable of doing both. I disagree that Apple should back down. Tim Cook's advice was given at a time when Ap
912.
The Great Smartphone War(vanityfair.com)
84 points by IBM 12y ago|79 comments
913.
by IBM 12y ago
I don't think the article says a different set of standards should apply to one or the other. It does suggest that there might be some political will to enact regulations for stronger privacy protection. It might not be good for Silico
914.
by IBM 12y ago
Sure, maybe Samsung will create a superior implementation to the ones they were found to be infringing and the consumer can benefit from their innovation.
915.
by IBM 12y ago
Because Samsung is using them in their products and profiting from them.
916.
Suit Claims Google’s Deals With Android Device Makers Violate Antitrust Laws(recode.net)
3 points by IBM 12y ago|0 comments
917.
by IBM 12y ago
Which is a refreshing change compared to how Google has been in recent years.
918.
by IBM 13y ago
You can interpret this as a signal that Apple has a lot of cash, and they make a lot of cash. CapEx and R&D have been steadily rising these past few years and Tim Cook has explicitly said new products would be released in 2014.
919.
by IBM 13y ago
Apple isn't working on your schedule.
920.
Amazon Sales Take a Hit in States With Online Tax (bloomberg.com)
82 points by IBM 13y ago|80 comments
921.
by IBM 13y ago
>The figures weren't made up, they were estimated based on a settlement offer made to Oracle prior to the trial. We have different definitions of what "made up" is. The estimate The Guardian made was based on the court doc
922.
by IBM 13y ago
The figures weren't made up, they were estimated based on a settlement offer made to Oracle prior to the trial. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/29/google-ear...
923.
by IBM 13y ago
I've been trying out Bing for a month now and it's pretty much equivalent to Google for me. I search less and less on search engines already and what I do search for, Bing has been able to deliver. The only thing that made the tra
924.
by IBM 13y ago
I'm glad I'm not the only person that notices this. There's a reason why these puff pieces came out when they did: http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/15/5615880/building-blocks-ho... http:&#x
925.
Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner thwarted by hack(cnet.com)
2 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
926.
by IBM 13y ago
Joe Random wasn't buying Wall Street's CDOs either.
927.
by IBM 13y ago
Google X is about generating good PR for the company.
928.
by IBM 13y ago
The rhetoric from patent-light companies resonates with techies/hackers because their interests align with theirs. If Google and Twitter are patent-light then your start-up is even more so.
929.
by IBM 13y ago
Because that's not their M.O. They like getting the PR value out of all of their projects even if it isn't commercially viable.
930.
by IBM 13y ago
Take a moment and remember the state of TV today so we can avoid all the discussion about how "obvious" the TV experience is years from now.

More ›