IBM

87 ms·

931.
by IBM 13y ago
Which is absurd because Eric continues to collect huge compensation packages from Google "for contributing to the company's success".
932.
Google’s Dominance of the Mobile Ad Market Is Slipping (blogs.wsj.com)
4 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
933.
by IBM 13y ago
What do you think about Factset's chances?
934.
by IBM 13y ago
I'm amused by it. It's a transfer of wealth from shareholders of those companies to founders and VCs. These are also the companies with dual class shares designed to keep control in the founders' hands. They all say it's
935.
by IBM 13y ago
It certainly did but only for Apple. Everyone else doesn't have the market position to make the same demands on carriers.
936.
The Ecosystem Chess Game(daringfireball.net)
5 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
937.
Amazon Raises Prime Subscription Price To $99 A Year(online.wsj.com)
1 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
938.
Why flying 'Internet drones' over Africa is a dumb, libertarian fantasy(theglobeandmail.com)
43 points by IBM 13y ago|57 comments
939.
by IBM 13y ago
Post some of them.
940.
by IBM 13y ago
Sure, the business he's built is an incredibly successful fund. From IEP's quarterly results: >An investment in IEP stock made at the beginning of 2000 has increased by approximately 1,500%, or an average annual return of 22%,
941.
by IBM 13y ago
I find it amusing how VCs and other Silicon Valley types are rushing to the aid of one of their own now that a perceived interloper is around. Characterizing activist investors as "short-term" and "vultures" is the go-
942.
by IBM 13y ago
The "those of us" is too small a user base for Apple to make trade-offs for. Most people don't care.
943.
by IBM 13y ago
Android isn't a threat to Apple, Android just replaced the incumbents Blackberry and Nokia. There is no Android OEM that can go head to head with Apple in the market they compete in but Samsung (high-end phones), and even there Samsung
944.
by IBM 13y ago
Android is gaining market share because of extremely low-end devices that are inexpensive. So far that hasn't been enough to convince developers to stop being iOS first, and especially not for tablets.
945.
Why you should avoid Google as a business technology supplier(itbusinessedge.com)
1 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
946.
by IBM 13y ago
Because it fits the narrative. Tim Cook is being cast as the operations guy that may be a good manager but isn't a transformative leader that Steve Jobs was. The title of her book is Haunted Empire: Apple After Steve Jobs. This is a bo
947.
by IBM 13y ago
Good news, he has! http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/09/the-post-jobs-era-tim-c... http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57370922-37/apple-ceo-tim-...
948.
Apple Design guidelines(developer.apple.com)
3 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
949.
by IBM 13y ago
The whole document was an interesting read. http://images.apple.com/iphone/business/docs/iOS_Security_Fe...
950.
by IBM 13y ago
That will be less of an issue going forward with free OS updates. Then it will just be people who don't want to upgrade for whatever reason that stay behind.
951.
Apple details Touch ID and the A7′s Secure Enclave(techcrunch.com)
4 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
952.
Apple launches big improvements for iOS management tools for enterprise(techcrunch.com)
1 points by IBM 13y ago|0 comments
953.
iOS Security [pdf](images.apple.com)
22 points by IBM 13y ago|1 comments
954.
by IBM 13y ago
It's not that Apple is a freeloader, it's that those companies were terrible at allocating capital. Apple does R&D on technology, its just done with the goal of being utilized in a product that is viable enough to have real bu
955.
by IBM 13y ago
Stick with value investing (or index investing if you don't have the skill/discipline/time for it).
956.
by IBM 13y ago
If only it was open source this never would have happened.
957.
by IBM 13y ago
What does the title mean?
958.
by IBM 13y ago
No it really isn't. They need to pay for a license or not infringe on the patents.
959.
by IBM 13y ago
That's the risk you run when shorting any stock, especially one with an already high short interest. It's better to just avoid the overvalued companies.
960.
by IBM 13y ago
The last time I valued Tesla, it needed to have CAGR revenue growth of over 70% in the next 5 years with margins of comparable high end car manufacturers (about 15%) to get a fair value of around $75. I hope you get off the train before thi

More ›