3 ms·

The figures weren't made up, they were estimated based on a settlement offer made to Oracle prior to the trial. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/

• Oletros 13y ago
  Those figures are made up, they don't have anything to do with how much Google earned from iOS or from Android and they aare explained [1] [1] http://marketingland.com/no-google-doesnt-make-four-times-more-off-the-iphone-vs-android-9017 http://marketingland.com/no-google-doesnt-make-four-times-mo...
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]
  • Oletros 13y ago
    > The figures weren't made up, they were estimated based on a settlement offer made to Oracle prior to the trial Then you can link to that settlement and to those figures. Until then, those figures where made up without any basis
    • Oletros 13y ago
      It is funny how people downvote facts
  • IBM 13y ago
    >The figures weren't made up, they were estimated based on a settlement offer made to Oracle prior to the trial. We have different definitions of what "made up" is. The estimate The Guardian made was based on the court document which is linked to in the article.
    • Oletros 13y ago
      Wrong, The Guardian couldn't estimate anything because the court documents didn't were about what The Guardian made up. Past damages were not a royalty percentage, 2.5 billion were not mobile revenue. So, they made up their figures with wrong assumptions, wrong revenues and wrong damages