Hizonner

24 ms·

391.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Which is super weird definition of hardcore porn. As far as I know, the definition of "hardcore porn" is and always has been explicit depiction of actual sexual activity (on edit: in a way intended to be sexually arousing to
392.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Mostly agree, but some people do consult religious texts for work. Well, sure, if you're a priest/rabbi/pastor/imam/whatever (why isn't there a generic word for this?), you're going to consult religio
393.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> religious and expression rights are legally protected. What "liberal democracy" has laws that tell F-Droid that it has to carry any particular apps, or how it has to mark them, again? There are some places that like to call
394.
by Hizonner 1y ago
If you're sitting around reading the Bible when you should be working, why should your boss treat that as better than sitting around playing a game when you should be working? But originally "NSFW" was meant for stuff you mig
395.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> whether we want more people following the voice in their head to kill their son Now, to be fair, the voice did walk that back once it was clear the guy was going to do it. It just needed to be reassured that it was special.
396.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Not unless you are intentionally taking in super weird definition of "offensive" or "hardcore porn". I'm sorry, but I find books that say straight out that I should be killed to be a bit on the offensive side.
397.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Very few of those laws apply to services that only have "incidental" content, especially if they're small, and for those that actually do apply, the right answer is to refuse to serve the affected states. They would definitel
398.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> label that accuses the text of being offensive Abrahamic religious texts, and a lot of others as well, are offensive. They clearly and directly glorify oppressive and/or genocidal violence in the past. There's a very stron
399.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Wait, F-Droid is doing/going to do age verification? Guess I have to find another app store. To use and to donate to. Stupid wars over what's NSFW are ignorable, but knuckling under to the AV gestapo isn't.
400.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels". -- Matthew 25:41 That's supposed to be a quote from Jesus, personally. In fact
401.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> the highest entity rather gets himself killed, then raising the hand against anyone Well, after personally destroying some cities, cursing an entire civilization with plagues including the death of their firstborn, and ordering the &qu
402.
by Hizonner 1y ago
How about "a small, strapped project that can use all the friends it can get shouldn't be wasting time on maintaining irrelevant metadata"? Not having categories like "NSFW" would be a nice level playing field.
403.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Like what policies? And how have they failed, since in fact Tor is not exclusively a crime tool? But, yeah, Tor is often a crime tool. It's a crime to be actively gay, or to support anybody in that, in a surprising amount of the
404.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Your admirably narrow obsession has been noted with approval. Congratulations on your usefulness. We look forward to manipulating you further.
405.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> 700 RPS is not a big number at all, for sure not enough to qualify as a DoS. That depends on what's serving the requests. And if you're making the requests, it is your job to know that beforehand.
406.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Original sin.
407.
by Hizonner 1y ago
TEACHING A CLASS IS NOT YOUR "INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY" IF YOU'RE A FUCKING PROFESSOR. And you cannot teach political science without talking about any political topics.
408.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> it’s difficult to see Trump mass murdering minorities or invading Europe No, it's actually not. Although it's really more about the people running Trump. Trump by himself would be totally ineffectual.
409.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Up until recently, I would have reminded you that the US government (admittedly unlike the Chinese government) has no legal authority to order anybody to do anything like that. Not only that, but if it asked , it'd be well advised to
410.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Like what, exactly?
411.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Compared to every other model of similar scale and capability, yes. Not actual open source.
412.
by Hizonner 1y ago
You do not understand how the law works, and you are making a fool of yourself. They are in the middle of asking a court to clarify what the law means by the word "harm". That is not settled as yet. Things like that get settled
413.
by Hizonner 1y ago
It is not legal for the government to induce a corporation to do that with threats of unrelated, bogus litigation, enforcement fishing expeditions, interference with the legally required government contracting process, or the like. Since
414.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Well, I'd be happy to see them replaced by decentralized systems, too, and while I'm capable of recognizing that many people value the recommendation services and rendezvous points that those platforms provide, I'd really rat
415.
by Hizonner 1y ago
That's not even close to "reliable and definitive". I'll give you "suggestive". And it presumably has certain volume requirements.
416.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Any creative chaffing or deception ideas?
417.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> There are already attribution technologies that are reliable and definitive. Gonna stop you right there and ask you to back that up. It's not plausible. Especially not if people are actively trying to mess up the "attribution
418.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Uh-huh. User-generated content is exactly like the Disney channel. Let's keep using the TikTok example. According to https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13279 , TikTok receives about 176 years of video per day. That&#x27
419.
by Hizonner 1y ago
I regret to inform you that there's a bug in your code. Specifically, it relies on the "moderatorApprovedForChildren" flag, which is sometimes sent incorrectly because of glitches in the system that sets that flag. Apparently
420.
by Hizonner 1y ago
You are the one claiming there's a problem, and you are the one (presumably) demanding legal and other action to deal with that "problem". That means that any burden of proof is 1000 percent on you . ... and before you haul

More ›