Hizonner

20 ms·

421.
by Hizonner 1y ago
I suppose some of that stuff could reasonably be called "sexualized". Pornographic? No. A problem? Not unless you have really weird hangups. Here's a unified list of all the "very first list" suggestions they say th
422.
by Hizonner 1y ago
You write the code for that and get back to me. Remember it has to work when the users are actively adversarial. You will of course have wasted your time on a non-problem, but at least maybe you'll have an appreciation for how hard a n
423.
by Hizonner 1y ago
I hate to direct traffic to people like that, but, you know, how about their actual "study"? I realize that the "journalists" at the Guardian aren't willing to provide the actual source link, but it's not hard
424.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> You think thirst traps are okay for kids? Yes. Promoting vaping, not so much. > We’re in the later innings of a hyper-sexualized society. O NOES! I mean, that's a ridiculous thing to say, but if it were true, so what?
425.
by Hizonner 1y ago
... and searching for obfuscated strings that nobody would even know about unless they were actively looking.
426.
by Hizonner 1y ago
They are saying that they can find some of that content when they use relatively sophisticated techniques to intentionally try to find it. They are in the business of whipping up outrage, and should not be given any oxygen.
427.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> than risk breaking stuff ... until somebody randomly chooses the same name for some reason and gets hosed. You're not helping.
428.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> McConnell had a majority in the Senate. If he'd been confident in his majority, he would have just taken every nomination to the floor and had them voted down. He didn't do that because he didn't think he'd win. I m
429.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> By keeping it descriptive instead of prescriptive. First of all, what it says is that they aren't allowed to talk about those matters at all . Read it. Second, even if that were not the case, I guarantee that if you write what yo
430.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Not relevant—they held the Senate. Sort of. McConnell found it necessary to prevent some of the nominations from coming to a vote, because he didn't have the votes to stop them. So, yeah, they held enough of the Senate to dick aro
431.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> what kinds of subsidies Resident tuition at state schools is below their average per-student expenditures. That's a subsidy from which they all benefit. It's enabled, in part, by the fact that foreign student tuition is ab
432.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> GOP does not do anything you mentioned. I must have hallucinated, say, that long period during Mitch McConnell openly stated he was going to prevent votes on any of Biden's judicial nominees (and followed through on that). Or the
433.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Foreign students are in fact a major "profit center" for a lot of universities, and do in fact subsidize domestic students.
434.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Could be. Although if that's what they're getting at, it's more likely they mean earth sciences and biology. "Yes, dumping all that CO2 into the atmosphere has measurably changed the climate and is likely to change it mo
435.
by Hizonner 1y ago
This is fun... > Signatories shall maintain institutional neutrality at all levels of their administration. This requires policies that all university employees, in their capacity as university representatives, will abstain from actions
436.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> "transforming or abolishing institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle, and even spark violence against conservative ideas." So what "units" do they think these are, and how are they supposedly doing it?
437.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> As violence against conservatives has been normalized for quite a while, it's a good idea. You wanna support that claim?
438.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Actual text: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/1...
439.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Do you also support a blanket ban of CCTV in public spaces? I'm not sure I support anything. I'm just pointing out that there is a path available if you don't just assume that you should be allowed to take video. But
440.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Teaser for an undescribed and probably overhyped product.
441.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Spreadsheets are a fundamentally important tool It's nice to know that you use spreadsheets all the time. I use them rarely, and often end up regretting that I didn't write a real program instead. And I'd definitely neve
442.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> I get it, but the alternative is what? Stop taking video in public, or at least of the public. You just assume you should be able to do that and the whole world should adjust to your preference. Maybe it should be the other way aro
443.
by Hizonner 1y ago
> Yes, there are potential other uses for a sim box but mostly they are used for VoIP purposes. So you mean... like, these are the exit points into the "legitimate" telephone network for, say, those random MedAlert scam calls I
444.
by Hizonner 1y ago
You do realize that laws like that get passed in part because of leaks... right?
445.
by Hizonner 1y ago
It turns out that in reality , I usually know both "around time Y" and "other information". You're going to narrow me down from 10 accounts to 1, or from 100 to 10.
446.
by Hizonner 1y ago
I was under the impression that, for any FHE scheme with "good" security, (a) there was a finite and not very large limit to the number of operations you could do on encrypted data before the result became undecryptable, and (b) e
447.
by Hizonner 1y ago
... and the next person working on the system thinks "well, this thing is unpredictable, so it's OK if I leak an unsalted hash of it". If they think at all, which is far from certain. Why does everybody want to find excuses t
448.
by Hizonner 1y ago
I know that the person I'm stalking created a pseudonymous account on service X around time Y. Based on other information, I have a limited number of suspect accounts. The creation time leaks to me, either via a bug which would otherw
449.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Because now, for the rest of eternity, every single person who writes any code that moves data from this table to somewhere else, for any purpose, has to remember that the primary key gives away the creation time of something, which can pot
450.
by Hizonner 1y ago
Because anything that knows the primary key now knows the timestamp. The UUID itself leaks information. It's not that it's not adding security. It's that it's actually subtracting security.

More ›