HervalFreire

12 ms·

61.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
I mean it could be both right? See this: https://www.genesisrecovery.com/drug-addiction-and-homelessn... One thing about both the studies you reference and studies I reference is that they're both correlative. Not caus
62.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
To your point and my sibling comment. There's a reason why the drug type can shift in such an extreme manner. It's because of lack of policing.
63.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Quoted from the same site in the 2022 study: "The death rate from fentanyl increased 10-fold from 2015 to 2019. The rate of prescription opioid deaths fell 30% from 2011 to 2019." "The number of amphetamine-related emergency
64.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
But it's been growing. Not just in CA but across the US. https://www.chcf.org/publication/2022-edition-substance-use-...
65.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
https://www.chcf.org/publication/2022-edition-substance-use-... I mean open your eyes too. In Socal and NorCal many areas have becime covered with people living on the streets. This is partly housing and drugs
66.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Strange. The things you were "missing" were covered in my CS program. I learned very little on the job. It was mostly things outside the job.
67.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Give me some examples of intricacies?
68.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
So you're saying if the wind is strong enough the right airplane can take off with 0 or negative speed? Has this ever been done? Excluding VTOL aircrafts of course.
69.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
How can we talk about what you're suggesting when half of the people don't even believe such a change will ever happen?
70.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
LLMs as they are now won't take over your job, but they are a herald for something in the future that could take your job. We aren't sure yet but the evidence is compelling enough that we need to consider the possibility. I mean y
71.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
I do not speak to fraudster or fantasists. Paraphrasing you earlier. Your responses to me in other threads were fucking rude and as a result I now literally hate you. So why bother, just leave and save everyone the trouble. Nobody cares for
72.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Flesh and understanding are separate concepts. The experience of being human is a separate concepts from understanding. Everything in the universe has a set of rules governing it's existence. To understand something means that one can
73.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Keep in mind there's a token limit. Once you pass that limit it no longer remembers. Yes. You are pointing out various flaws which again is quite obvious. Everyone knows of the inconsistencies with these LLMs. Too this I again say that
74.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Agreed. But why be delusional? The tool is right at your fingertips. Why deny the reality of the situation rather then face the truth? If they fear the AI owners attack the owners directly. Don't attack reality itself and say the AIs a
75.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Not all people. There is a division of people here. People able to rationally see the consequences of a new technology. And people who have to bend their perception of reality to protect a vested interest. For software engineers the skills
76.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
I'm sure the person promoting electricity had financial interest in it. You know there is much nuance here yet you still had to make this simplistic comment. Put your real name and email address in your profile and respond with your fu
77.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Constrained game lol? You know arithmetic isn't constrained right? Computers can fucking beat us in arithmetic without even implementing an AI or utilizing machine learning. Let me put it bluntly.. you have to be a literal idiot to thi
78.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
You recall mercury? Mercury was used by doctors for years as medicine and it was validated by anecdotal experiences. But it really had the complete opposite effect. It killed people. That is the reliability of anecdotes and an illustration
79.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
>If I gift you resources, the trade is fair. A gift isn't a fair trade. That's why a gift is not called a fair trade. There's such phrase: "fair gift". > You don't get to tell me what I do with my resourc
80.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
It's because the lack of practical applications. People can make broken abstractions without knowledge of the fundamentals like compositions or functors and still get their shit to work. That matters more to engineers then true underst
81.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
It just hasn't clicked for you yet. I wouldn't call it "another level of abstraction" It's more of a "fundamental theory of abstraction". Once it clicks you can see it. And you will see all the design patt
82.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
You are getting your emotions mixed up with facts. When you use open source you are exploiting a resource as there is no fair trade. It's not a crime nor is it immoral but because no fair trade occured it is technically an exploitation
83.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
But the problem is we see opposite trends as well. We see paradoxical trends and trends that are not. It just means the paradox can sometimes occur it does not mean the paradox is a general rule.
84.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Except how did the company go bankrupt then? This paradox only occurs if every resource is abundant. We tend to see it a lot (especially in the last decade) because of the easy money policies by the Fed in the last decade or so. Following y
85.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
I mean how you perceive the tool is relevant as well. It's just self delusion and denial. It's obvious if your productivity increases because of AI it diminishes the need of another person's productivity. You give everyone mo
86.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
The problem is your CEO was right. Exploiting open source is the right move. Instead of hiring engineers to write an operating system you guys likely exploited Linux and a bunch of other free tools. 100 percent: open source has contributed
87.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
So you're confirming what I said. No theoretical basis. You just reaffirmed my position that this rule of thumb is anecdotal with your own anecdotal experiences. If you look through this very thread there are people talking about anecd
88.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
>While this has some theoretical merit, What theoretical merit? It sounds like a completely made up rule of thumb based off of a persons anecdotal experience.
89.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
I'm talking about the recent acceleration of changes, chatGPT, dall e, midjourney. chatGPT and dall-e put fuel on the fire. Interest has spiked and additionally the industry and academia is matching the trend with an equivalent refocus
90.
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Of course we hit many technological limits long ago. Most miracle technologies have already been discovered. Heck space travel has had zero actual progress other then Elon redoing what we did decades ago more "efficiently". The AI

More ›