Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HBKXNCUO
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>I don't know anyone who wouldn't be afraid of a Nazi-style dictatorship Do you believe that if people with ideas that you consider to be Nazi-like are allowed participate in the public debate as freely and meaningfully as ever
32.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Winning elections is about convincing people, not brainwashing them. Are you suggesting that political advertisements don't use the same sorts of psychological manipulation as non-political advertisements? Or you do consider psycho
33.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
There are breeds of dog that are larger than wolves and were bred specifically for the purpose of protecting herds of livestock from wolves and other such large predators. They're not necessarily cheap to own though, and a fair number
34.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>A society where fathers are used to and expected to participate more actively in child raring will also care more about their children IMHO. Such a society is hard to build without gender equality and independence for women. I don'
35.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Why do you assume that daycare staff are minimal wage workers as opposed to well paid professionals that know more about intellectual enrichment and child psychology than the average parent? I didn't assume it, I looked up what the
36.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Daycare, the act of handing your infants and toddlers over to minimum wage workers who do not care about your children on an individual basis and who are also supposed to be taking care of several other children, is not a great idea, or eve
37.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Most people don't have enough in savings to last more than half of a year without a job. I'd call that "quickly". You could try to stop corporations from preferentially hiring people who have recent relevant experience,
38.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>And I'd bet that those who feel forced into that choice choose career over staying at home with their children more often than the other way around as a result. Perhaps, I don't know the numbers, but either way, that is not th
39.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Should your spouse leave you or die, and you are totally dependent on him, that would suck. A) Don't have children with someone that is going to leave you, B) life insurance. >But that was not really what I was thinking of but r
40.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Not all costs are monetary. Do you need a source for that?
41.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
The government can't pay those costs unless you are suggesting some kind of communal child raising situation rather than having children raised by their parents. Raising children well requires a lot of time and effort. I don't thi
42.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>But as a society we have organised ourselves in such a way that this choice is economically and socially much harder to make than it used to be and in my view much harder to make than it should be. Sounds to me like we should make a con
43.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
If you want both parents to be independent, then (for the vast majority of people who are not very wealthy) of course both need to be employed or able to quickly become employed. Do you need a source for that? Both of those take time, and t
44.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
That doesn't mean that it's a good idea to have it.
45.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
What is wrong with having other options is that there is a cost associated with maintaining those other options, and the children will be paying it one way or another. Raising children well is enormously time consuming and difficult. Parent
46.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>In the pre-Trump era politicians had to at least pretend they weren't corrupt. I guess you should let Hillary know she should not have been in control of a foundation that was receiving millions of dollars in donations from foreign
47.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>My point is that a communities' right to self-govern has very little to do with where you're allowed to freely move today -- it's a vast web of historical agreements, geopolitics, and the lottery of birth. Historical agre
48.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>The people in CA cannot, for instance, allow workers from London to freely immigrate despite their shared interests and mutual benefit. Right, part of the pact with OK is that they have ceded some rights to a common political body. Noth
49.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
The people in CA have certain shared interests with the people of OK. They have, for instance, pooled their military resources together, so that if anyone invades CA, soldiers from OK will protect it the same as they would OK. To cement tha
50.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
And so free of pathogens.
51.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
A bigger question would be: why did whatever selective process that resulted in our capacity for thought stop improving on it 100,000 years ago?
52.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Love is not a quantity linearly dependent on the contact hours I spend with them. Having other people involved in their upbringing does not mean they receive less love. OK, I don't know what that means. What I do know is that if yo
53.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Cooking is what, 1 hour a day? And it's something you can often involve your kids in If you want it to take three times as long, I guess. It's good to do with them sometimes obviously but most people are not going to have time
54.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>We're in a transition period. You can say that, I guess. There's no particularly compelling reason to believe that getting through the transition period to the promised land is possible or that the grass in actually greener on
55.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
That wouldn't support my claim very much at all, really, because there are too many confounding variables and too few countries to support any kind of causitive claim. I don't know if countries with subsidized childcare have more
56.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
I think encouraging them to be homemakers rather than encouraging them to be in the workforce would make them happier, generally, and that we should strongly prioritize catering to the majority. Do you think women are happier now than women
57.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
No, it's really not 58 hours to spend with their parents. If both parents are working, the rest of the non-work hours are going to be consumed by cooking (if there is time for that, or else expensive prepared meals), cleaning, househol
58.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Some women are happy being homemakers today, and some are happy in the workforce. Far more were happy being homemakers in the past. >I'm not sure how we are currently catering to women in the workforce. Affirmative action, equal
59.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>I love my family, thanks, and am a competent father. I don't love, and am not good at, taking care of small children all day every day, and my children would suffer if I had to do that for an extended period of time. I don't t
60.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>If nothing else, I could never hope to beat them on experience. That's fine. Unless you are emotionally stunted, they could never hope to beat you on love. >There are Nordic countries where a minimum of one day of day care a wee
More ›