Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HBKXNCUO
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Do you have reason to believe that most women throughout history were not happy being homemakers and mothers? Do you believe women are happier now that they are having few or no children and are instead working to support a corporation that
62.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Professionally trained Minimum wage. High school diploma. >day care professionals probably do that job just as well as me, or better. If you are truly so terrible at taking care of children that you cannot care for your own flesh and
63.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Substitute whatever antisocial behavior you want, it's beside the point.
64.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Also why can't men take care of the children and women work? They can, and some do, but there is the tricky problem that women tend not to want to be married to men that make less money than them.
65.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
And more certainly than that, neither is raising other people's children well in exchange for minimum wage.
66.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>It's extremely difficult to correlate this to long-term happiness or well-being. Sure, as with any social science there are huge numbers of complicating factors, which makes it difficult to really study anything conclusively. No do
67.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Where did I say this should be mandatory Nowhere, just like where I suggested you said it should be. >was the best and only option? You said it was an advantage of daycare. My point is that there are better ways to get that advantage
68.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>So, because society undervalues value their work, they are incompetent losers? Because society pays less for that sort of work, the sort of people that end up doing that work will tend to be less competent than the people that do more h
69.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>You are assuming massive incompetence on the part of child care workers with no prior evidence. The fact that they earn minimum wage is evidence of their collective incompetence. The fact that they would not be emotionally destroyed by
70.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>But, in terms of pure economics, let's put it at an extreme. >Child-care is too expensive, a woman who would otherwise go on to make breakthroughs in medical science stays at home. This sounds like a fun game. Child-care is subs
71.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>While it's not impossible to recover from that, it's extremely difficult On the other hand, it's impossible for your children to get back the time they could have spent in their most formative and vulnerable years around
72.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>I think subsidized daycare is a great idea as long as it isn't too much of a disincentive for those who want to stay home with their kids. Why would you be OK with any kind of disincentive to parents staying home with their childre
73.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>it's very rare to meet a woman who only desires to stay at home for the duration of a child's life I assume you mean until the child goes to school or perhaps becomes an adult, and in my experience it's not rare to meet w
74.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Proper vaccination is entirely invisible. Everything may as well be invisible if you refuse to look at it. There have been very, very few studies done on the long term effects of vaccines. All the general public knows is that the CDC [1
75.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>and in doing so endanger other people who could not get vaccination because of other illness. Right, just look at the number of people dying from Scarlet Fever because of the low rate of vaccination.
76.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Other than the flu, none of them kill more than a handful of children per year.
77.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
I don't think so. If he is genuinely terrified of something that is that unlikely to kill or seriously harm his child, it would be in his interest to see a therapist about that. I am guessing that his statement was actually just needle
78.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
Because if you can't communicate with your neighbors you are very unlikely to have a sense of community with them and some people prefer to have a sense of community with their neighbors rather than feeling disconnected and alienated f
79.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>but I think any purchase option is going to end up matching wealthy men with attractive women. Isn't that how it normally works out anyway?
80.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
I'm not trolling. You are measuring us (really other people since you are not involved) against a fantastical standard.
81.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
You essentially said we're not grown up because we don't live in some kind of magical world where nations don't have competing interests that manifest in these sorts of displays. Competition is inherent to life, and, if anyth
82.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
You used the term first, so probably you should define it, and then you can explain why it's "questionable" for threat of prosecution to ever be considered torture in such a place, and then you can explain why the country thr
83.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>It is not a flaw of Google that it won't suggest "is hillary clinton still controlled by the jews" when you type "is hillary clinton". If it was just a big trie of what everyone typed, it would be completely dom
84.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
That would be nice. Too bad the people with the power to direct the education of the masses don't benefit from that and have no loyalty to the masses either.
85.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>and to make people think otherwise requires a lot of education. With enough education, you can make most people think just about anything.
86.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>People, unlike machines, tend to regard differences between groups with suspicion and are biased against acknowledging these differences. That is true for people in the western world that have been heavily dosed with the ideas coming ou
87.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
They don't have to articulate their reasonable suspicion to you, they need to articulate their reasonable suspicion to the court.
88.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
The "what if" was in response to your classification of developing an identity based on your nation as "insanity". I'm not asking you to ponder if there are any benefits to it today. Given your attitude, I don'
89.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>There probably is also an evolutionary reason for rape to exist, does that mean rape is fine? My question is not in regard to whether anything is or isn't "fine". The point of my question was to suggest there might be a r
90.
▲
by
HBKXNCUO
7y ago
>Personally I don't mind the artificiality of countries, but the insanity of the identities some people (artificially) construct around being randomly born somewhere (especially since people who contributed fuck all to wherever they
More ›