Guvante

34 ms·

541.
by Guvante 3y ago
> During President Obama's 2012 reelection campaign, he told voters that manufacturing jobs would be a crucial part of the American economy's resurgence. His administration set a goal to “create 1 million new manufacturing jobs
542.
by Guvante 3y ago
So has the trust that climate change will go bad starting from international reports in 1990 not earned? We need to make predictions for more than 30 years that are accurate before we trust scientists? Or has it been destroyed? By what? You
543.
by Guvante 3y ago
I live in SoCal and it is either 5.2 mi to my destination on roads or 3.6 mi on roads and 2.4 mi on bike paths... Going almost a mile out of the way to have less than half the trip on a bike path isn't a great combination.
544.
by Guvante 3y ago
I do think there is value in a larger fixed payment regardless of this implementation. After all, a lot of the costs aren't in generation but delivery.
545.
by Guvante 3y ago
IIRC he had ~20% of the vote in fervent supporters in 2020. 40% of the Republican vote is phenomenal but not a majority. So a majority of Republicans were not "Trump or nothing" they just voted for their political appointee. (Does
546.
by Guvante 3y ago
Lincoln Project is very Republican. They just don't support Trump...
547.
by Guvante 3y ago
Everyone paying the government instead of a healthcare insurance company does not make the US more progressive. Yet your evidence implies that is the case. Similarly talking about progressive income tax and ignore other forms of taxation is
548.
by Guvante 3y ago
Honestly it looks like Power companies trying to get a fixed payment predicting that their costs will go down overtime leading to a net win for them.
549.
by Guvante 3y ago
Honestly rent control isn't as simple as you specified either. Implying that there are no benefits to rent control for those living in rent controlled units is just as deceptive as claiming that rent control will help everone. The unde
550.
by Guvante 3y ago
The US has spent (inflation adjusted) $34 billion on fusion as of the end of 2021. Assuming no real change it would be $35 billion as of the end of 2023. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2021/ph241/margraf1&#
551.
by Guvante 3y ago
They both had more money than God. Everyone would do different things with their children if money was literally not a problem.
552.
by Guvante 3y ago
If you have a bunch of money lying around, sure. But most people are pretty decently in debt or at best just outright poor when they run into issues like that.
553.
by Guvante 3y ago
When you control the money supply it becomes impossible to default for the usual reasons. If you disagree don't park your funds in T-Bonds.
554.
by Guvante 3y ago
If you assume you can outsmart a VC who has worked with hundreds of startups with an idea you just had you are exactly the schmuck they want to work with. The actual deals are very complex and the details are hard to understand but it isn&#
555.
by Guvante 3y ago
Some VC firms are willing to work with less growth potential. The problem is those VC firms are much harder to get started with. After all the whole schtick of the VCs complained about in OP is to fund tons companies and make so much money
556.
by Guvante 3y ago
That isn't true, laziness will punch straight through a tight definition of error code handling. After all if you have three API layers realizing in this situation the second layer isn't forwarding that error code because it erron
557.
by Guvante 3y ago
The preposition you gave was entirely "you don't like this law so let me give you a law that you do like as a counter example". Don't pretend it was anything else.
558.
by Guvante 3y ago
A license that effectively bans your company from using Microsoft anywhere is an interesting choice.
559.
by Guvante 3y ago
They managed to handle what a fission reactor outputs every second in this experiment. I don't think that points to a commercial reactor whenever someone spends a few billions.
560.
by Guvante 3y ago
You always need to compare write vs read performance. Turning a single table update into a 10 table one could tip your lock contention to the point where you are write bound or worse start hitting retries. Certainly it makes sense to move r
561.
by Guvante 3y ago
Honestly on a whole, yes. We now use less lead in consumer goods because of the label. I would assume other carcinogens were similarly reduced in usage to avoid the labeling requirement. All prop 65 warnings are required only for substances
562.
by Guvante 3y ago
I am referencing established precedent with regards to compelled speech which per precedent is required to reach a higher standard of importance than other first amendment questions. You are referencing untested hypothetical challenges agai
563.
by Guvante 3y ago
FDA saying "don't lie that you improve things without proof" is a restriction
564.
by Guvante 3y ago
Clear labeling based on scientific studies isn't the same thing as open ended phrasing.
565.
by Guvante 3y ago
Why do you assume your examples didn't pass the high bar I mentioned? Don't pretend that the cigarette labeling was as simple as this bill. That was an incredibly complex process that took decades. Restricting what can be said is
566.
by Guvante 3y ago
Requiring a site to display what you say is a pretty high bar. That is pretty obviously breaking the first amendment right to say what you want to say. Doesn't mean it can't happen but legally the bar is quite high to justify that
567.
by Guvante 3y ago
Parents installing things on devices accessible to minors is certainly less restrictive given it doesn't impact anyone else.
568.
by Guvante 3y ago
It is 2 or 3 from my experience since the tiny size means they don't have enough of an impact if you have only one. Also they sell non-mint ones... My point is a serving size of 2 would avoid this skullduggery and be representative of
569.
by Guvante 3y ago
So when capitalism fails to provide a solution to problems it creates isn't capitalism that fixes it so capitalism isn't to blame anymore?
570.
by Guvante 3y ago
On the one hand it does have an asterisk and says <0.5g at the end of the label. On the other hand changing the serving size to ~1g would clear this up so there is a lot of rules lawyering going on here. Especially since none of their co

More ›