Honestly on a whole, yes. We now use less lead in consumer goods because of the label. I would assume other carcinogens were similarly reduced in usage to avoi

Honestly on a whole, yes. We now use less lead in consumer goods because of the label. I would assume other carcinogens were similarly reduced in usage to avoid the labeling requirement. All prop 65 warnings are required only for substances that show an increase in cancer risk. We can argue whether a higher increase in risk should be required but pretending that "increase in risk" is a lie because the naive reading assumes a higher magnitude of impact doesn't mean it isn't science based.