Why do you assume your examples didn't pass the high bar I mentioned? Don't pretend that the cigarette labeling was as simple as this bill. That was an incredi

Why do you assume your examples didn't pass the high bar I mentioned? Don't pretend that the cigarette labeling was as simple as this bill. That was an incredibly complex process that took decades. Restricting what can be said is not the same as forcing speech. (This is in reference to your FDA comment which is a different topic) You added more examples all of which have significant effort and legal backing to their enforcement. Most notably most of those examples come from working with the industry to create standards for safety. All of them were developed working with the impacted industries and had solid justifications for why the labelling requirement is needed. Especially anything involving natural gas. If you fuck up the natural gas line going into your house that doesn't just impact you it impacts anyone within several hundred yards of your house. Similarly electrical requirements are either the federal government giving away access to a public good (frequencies of light for exclusive use) in exchange for certain restrictions on devices or electrical things that are quite dangerous again. Actual proven safety is different than "I decided it was harmful" and pretending that they are the same is ignorant at best.