Gudahtt

7 ms·

1.
by Gudahtt 7y ago
I think I understand the case you're making - that generic solutions are generally preferable to special-case solutions. That's a sensible enough position to take. But it's pretty unreasonable to call it _bad design_ in a vac
2.
You Are Probably a Victim of the Largest Theft of All Time [video](youtube.com)
2 points by Gudahtt 8y ago|0 comments
3.
by Gudahtt 8y ago
Yes, this is what passed. The "5 million unique monthly visitors" point is concerning too, because that term is not clearly defined.
4.
by Gudahtt 8y ago
That description includes any for-profit services that involve user-generated content. That doesn't make me any less concerned. Also that link appears to be dead, so I'm not sure what comment you're referring to.
5.
by Gudahtt 8y ago
Not all for-profit websites are run by big corporations. The companies you're describing here are also the ones that will find it easiest to comply with these new regulations. YouTube for example was already pressured to create a filte
6.
by Gudahtt 8y ago
This update includes everything in V8 v7.3 as well: https://v8.dev/blog/v8-release-73
7.
by Gudahtt 9y ago
It looks like you're still using Neo4j 2.3. Have you tried using newer versions of Neo4j? There have been some pretty substantial performance improvements. Additionally, Neo4j does support clustering with their Enterprise edition. It a
8.
by Gudahtt 9y ago
Yes, the Community Edition and the Enterprise Edition are different. Certain functionality is restricted to the Enterprise Edition. It's a different codebase. I didn't say otherwise. You can see it here: http://github.c
9.
by Gudahtt 9y ago
Yes, that is the case.
10.
by Gudahtt 9y ago
It is AGPL; it's dual licensed. You can use it freely under the terms of AGPL, or you can enter into a commercial agreement with Neo Technology and use it without the restrictions imposed by the AGPL. Here's the license: https:&#
11.
by Gudahtt 9y ago
Oh? Neo4j is free. The Community edition is GPLv3, and the Enterprise edition is AGPLv3.
12.
by Gudahtt 10y ago
To address the other points you raised; I personally found Babel 6 easier to use and understand than Babel 5. I suspect this is because I needed to configure Babel 5 anyway to meet my needs, so I was required to understand the configuration
13.
by Gudahtt 10y ago
No arguments about the poor documentation on how to migrate; that's fair. But we're straying from the point I was trying to make; your feedback was overly negative and hyperbolic. We're all guilty of doing this at times, but
14.
by Gudahtt 10y ago
>However, I am one of those people who think that Babel6 is terrible, that it "broke the web", and it marked the beginning of the entire JavaScript fatigue era. Granted, I wouldn't consider this a personal attack. But it d
15.
by Gudahtt 10y ago
The rule changes made... around 2 years ago now I think? Kinda made this complaint obsolete. They changed it to allow your ratio to dip well below the "required" ratio as long as you kept seeding. Keeping your ratio up wasn&#x27
16.
by Gudahtt 10y ago
It's disingenuous to attribute that act to Buddhism; that was a political act.