Geminidog

14 ms·

61.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Usually there is no way to identify it. Even if the contents were spelled out, you wouldn't know which chocolate contained which filler. Forest Gump came out in the mid 90s.
62.
by Geminidog 6y ago
https://www.sees.com/chocolate/assortments Forest Gump said that quote. He's referring to these box's of chocolates where each candy contains some filling that's pretty much unknown until you eat it.
63.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Another day another programming metaphor/analogy on HN. It's like the quotation "Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get." Yeah I already knew life is random, comparing it to another r
64.
by Geminidog 6y ago
The argument is for the same exact thing. I have not gone off topic. If you take the time to read what I wrote I literally tore apart your reasoning piece by piece. Again The Roman etymology of the word dictator is not relevant only the def
65.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>A religion is the cumulative result of thousands of years of culture and thought. Googling some random Biblical phrases isn’t really much of an argument...especially considering that a majority of Christians look more to the church or t
66.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>No, I’m sorry but you clearly don’t have much knowledge of Christianity or religion in general. And you clearly don't know my background. I may be atheist now but I wasn't in the past. Also there is no need to disparage an ent
67.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Not a troll. It's more convenient for your to think I'm a troll rather then face reality and admit I'm totally right.
68.
by Geminidog 6y ago
God willed the Uighurs to have no option just as he willed your misguided reply to my comment. He also ironically willed me into becoming an atheist. Essentially, God is not only the dictator of humanity he is the dictator of reality as we
69.
by Geminidog 6y ago
It's one thing to be excessively against china it's another thing to be excessively pro china. You are the former. What has a occurred in China is an economic miracle that has never been seen in the history of human civilization.
70.
by Geminidog 6y ago
When you divvy up shares in an investment to meaningless portions like 0.00001% of a company there's no utility in the investment period. It then becomes the same thing as buying and selling useless paper. In order to make the system t
71.
by Geminidog 6y ago
That's the meta view from the outside looking in. If you truly believe in Christianity then you truly believe God is the dictator and you believe there isn't a choice in the matter. Most Christians are okay with this, which is my
72.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I mean who didn't know this? It's quite obvious that if you're in debt or are poor you're not in a position to start a startup. Meanwhile if mommy and daddy are billionaires you can start up a business and fail with no w
73.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Christianity is basically a dictatorship where god is the dictator. Many people consider Christianity to be a good thing, so it's not that hard to believe that a dictatorship can be more than just purely evil. Do not let your biased as
74.
by Geminidog 6y ago
if the method is called "f" and it exists on "a" then you have access to "f" via "a.f()". It's redundant to call it via "f(a)". If you're saying it's easier to edit "f&qu
75.
by Geminidog 6y ago
That’s because the ideologists operate based on intuition rather then identifying the exact reason why one paradigm is better. OO is bad because it promotes writing logic with free variables and context. Logic that relies on free variables
76.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Why can't you just call the method on the instance directly? This is only useful for when a, is not quite the same type as the the class you're copying the method from.
77.
by Geminidog 6y ago
This guy makes a simple concept too complicated. The main thing that's different about python OO is the method. class SomeClass def someMethod(self: SomeClass, someVar: int) -> int: return self.x + somVar
78.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Speaking hypothetically I feel this kind of thing is on the scale of self driving cars. There needs to be a secondary break through in ML for progress or you need magnitudes of more data then is available on earth to make this even viable.
79.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Your initial argument painted the problem as a moral conundrum questioning where we draw "lines." I cannot agree with this sentiment. Codifying such intuitions into axiomatic rules is challenging but classifying a given situation
80.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>Which degree should we start judging at? Morality doesn't need to be codified into exact terms in order to be relevant. At what point does killing become a crime? When you kill an ant for no reason? When you kill an animal for food
81.
by Geminidog 6y ago
https://www.boredpanda.com/socially-anxious-girl-friendship-... The above is an example on how the entire school thought some girl was stupid because she asked too many questions. They were right in a way but also wrong. Th
82.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Yes this is real. We all like to think asking questions doesn't make you look stupid but the reality is, it does. That's why most humans (men especially) have an inborn fear of asking questions... it's actually an evolved tra
83.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Sounds like you've never dealt with a type checking language in general. I recommend using a language that forces you to do type checking like haskell. Haskell is super hard so just use it until you see the light and understand why typ
84.
by Geminidog 6y ago
With pycharm you don't even have to run the code. Your type checker will highlight all errors real time.
85.
by Geminidog 6y ago
This is just your standard formalization of a process to make it sound more professional and seem more legitimate. It's similar to agile.
86.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>The rest of the world needs to catch up. They're behind the times. It's not about the times. It's about biology, people are born with this type of behavior that is as biologically ingrained as heterosexuality or homosexua
87.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I wouldn't call it racism because this behavior isn't unique to japan... it's unique to humanity. It will happen everywhere where you look and drastically different from anything the local population has ever seen before. Onl
88.
by Geminidog 6y ago
That's just your subjective opinion on the matter and you are free to have it. I share different thoughts on the issue though. In all seriousness my post is lampooning the absurdity of calling something an objective opinion because any
89.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Not only that, every language and design ever made on the face of the earth doesn't have any design mistakes at all. Everything is just an opinion and subjective preference. In fact point out any mistake to me ever made and I'll j
90.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I wouldn't call it racist. You are genuinely an oddity if you're not japanese and not a tourist. Racism is a deeper thing. True racism exists in some form between the chinese and the japanese due to the horrific atrocities committ

More ›