Geminidog

15 ms·

91.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I disagree with software architecture. There's not enough theory and science in organizing code and understanding complexity. Most of what goes on here is just guessing. If you created "good architecture" it only means futur
92.
by Geminidog 6y ago
This makes the avenue for detecting covid the same avenue for getting it. Covid is transmitted through breathing which is just a less aggressive form of sniffing. Thus the doggo would get covid then spread it to everyone he sniffs.
93.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>I don't mean to be snarky, but evidently you're not nearly as comfortable working in C++ as you are working in Python. Your interpretation of this is that you have gained sufficient experience with both languages to know that
94.
by Geminidog 6y ago
> You can come up with alternative definitions of a word if you want, but that doesn't change the definition of the word. The word you used is an insult in most settings, as it refers to mentally disabled people. https://
95.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>If I hit a reproducible crash in C++, I can drop into a debugger, and work out where it came from. If necessary, I can look at the disassembled code, because it's reasonably feasible to map assembly language to C++ constructs. I cu
96.
by Geminidog 6y ago
The alternative pick which is marking both women as programmers would have made the score exactly the same.
97.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Unfortunate that as of right now, most low level stuff is basically C++.
98.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I just did the switch from 10 years of python to C++. Low level programming is way harder with the C++ stack. I blame mostly the language rather then the level. C++ is just a pain in the ass. If you get a low level programming job that uses
99.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>I'm sorry I gave you the benefit of the doubt. This is basically your way of saying that my viewpoint is sexist. I have not acted in such a manner, and please cite evidence as to where I am acting that way if you believe otherwise.
100.
by Geminidog 6y ago
But I took 10 samples. Let's take it to the extreme. Lets say the test had 100 questions. If out of all the people who took the test, one person got a score of 100/100 out of 10 million people who took the test it means that there
101.
by Geminidog 6y ago
> Savants are mentally impaired people with unusual abilities perfect memory and calculator-like ability to compute math operations, etc. Calling people mentally disabled is not a compliment. I focused on the perfect memory and calculato
102.
by Geminidog 6y ago
The numbers are off. You can't have votes be your basis in how many people took the test ( I didn't vote for example) and you can't have the amount of 8/10 comments be a metric for the sole count of people who scored tha
103.
by Geminidog 6y ago
>You brag about your soft skills, but are unable to explain a simple concept succintly and without aggression. I never bragged about my soft skills. I targeted you as someone who's using the extreme technicality of a definition to s
104.
by Geminidog 6y ago
The logic is sound when applied to my singular observation. But a good number of people got > 8/10. Read the thread.
105.
by Geminidog 6y ago
People need to balance there weaknesses with strengths. Just because one demographic is weak at something doesn't mean they're strong in another. While intuitively I agree that what Camile Pagila says makes sense, there is no defi
106.
by Geminidog 6y ago
That's new information to me. Thanks for pointing it out, it might have changed my selection process for the women.
107.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Hmmm, didn't know this, thanks for pointing it out.
108.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I said something akin to men are unlikely to be nurses, so I didn't choose men. I think the ideological rhetoric of feminism has infected the viewpoints of normal people so much so that one needs to tiptoe around something that is obvi
109.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I got 8/10 which says otherwise. I voted serial killer for both women just because of how unlikely it is for a female to invent a programming language. If it wasn't for that I would be basically 90% correct. This means statistical
110.
by Geminidog 6y ago
So every species on the face of the earth that ever expanded its territory is invasive? That's basically every living thing on the face of the earth. Make no mistake, almost every living thing that expanded its territory had a negative
111.
by Geminidog 6y ago
We're no longer invasive. Almost every wild animal on every continent has evolved an innate fear of humans as a defense mechanism. We have been the apex predator across the world for a long long time and animals have evolved to deal wi
112.
by Geminidog 6y ago
But of course many people who are working on this are driven by the competition as well. Both collaboration and competition have their place, but make no doubt, the world itself is proof that competition is likely the primary driver behind
113.
by Geminidog 6y ago
We're not talking about health. Competition and the cred received for for being first to market will drive people to compete and therefore innovate. Whether that's healthy or not is not only a big convoluted topic, but a separate
114.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I'm familiar. The jail breaking scene and other examples are one offs though. You just need to take a holistic view of life and civilization to know how critical competition is to success. All of society and the development of capitali
115.
by Geminidog 6y ago
This type of programming is actually a subset of functional programming called point free programming. It's equivalent to programming using only combinators as the fundamental unit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta
116.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Your post implies that I discounted collaboration which I obviously did not. Look at the original post again, it deliberately says that competition is important as well as collaboration. Hence why your reply is categorically baseless. As fo
117.
by Geminidog 6y ago
I never edited any of my posts. That line is just a fragment of the post, which specifically has this line: “ We all like to think that collaboration, harmony and love drives innovation but much of innovation is built around intense rivalry
118.
by Geminidog 6y ago
Obviously. When teams of people compete intensely , the collaboration within the teams themselves must be just as intense. I find it slightly offensive that someone would accuse me of discounting collaboration when 1. I never discounted it,
119.
by Geminidog 6y ago
The more spiciness and completive things are the better the overall results. We all like to think that collaboration, harmony and love drives innovation but much of innovation is built around intense rivalry and competition as well. Don&#x2
120.
by Geminidog 6y ago
That's only because the word "intelligence" is subjective and ill defined. The problem is our usage of the word intelligence as a primary entity. Instead iq should be the primary benchmark for mental performance and intellige

More ›