Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
FDSGSG
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
70 ms
·
781.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Why is this so controversial? The contaminant does not seem to be described anywhere, nor any consequences of this contamination. For all we know Juul shipped 1M mint pods contaminated with strawberry flavour. The fact that the story comple
782.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
> parent of someone who died from this. So uh, do such people actually exist? The article doesn't suggest that anyone died.
783.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
> Basically none of them are good enough for a real world scenario in a busy city So what's "good enough"? Even if these systems don't prevent all collisions they'll often vastly reduce the speeds at which they h
784.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Oh, I just ignore the speed limits when there's no traffic. With Waze and laserlicht I've never got a speeding ticket. If you're driving through France or Spain after 1 AM you'll see see that everyone else tends to be sp
785.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
I certainly think such nationalists should be ostracised in the west. Why exactly should we give the Chinese nationalists a pass?
786.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Just because you're driving fast doesn't mean you have to be driving dangerously, but of course there's going to be a significant correlation as idiots also like to drive fast. I have no problem slowing down from 200 to 130 w
787.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
How come? The roads themselves certainly aren't the limiting factor, often you could go even faster. > anything above 150-160kmh is pushing it for most of the highways I've traveled in Europe Anything above 150-160kmh is certai
788.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
There are exceptions to this though. If you're driving through Europe at night you can easily spend most of your trip on highways safely going 180kmh or faster, saving you many hours on longer trips.
789.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
> It isnt possibly India. It's just as much "possibly India" as it's "possibly China", there's literally zero evidence (circumstantial or not) suggesting that the post originated from either. > could
790.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
You couldn't, not via console access anyway. However, if the attacker gains RCE many IPMI implementations theoretically allow for DMA, but this is a significantly more complex attack to mount in practice with no public PoCs available.
791.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
If you just ignore random reboots, sure. But why would you?
792.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Yeah this sounds so weird. Data loss due to bad RAM will be extremely similar with or without encryption, it's not going to corrupt the header of the disk. The catastrophic data loss you describe almost certainly resulted from you doin
793.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
>Not to get too meta, but if it was intentional, why would it necessarily be, since it's so incidental to the narrative? The decision to add "possibly China" despite no evidence pointing towards that was certainly intent
794.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
I have now done that, my opinion remains unchanged.
795.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
>For dedicated servers this would work, especially for VPN where data-loss is "acceptable". FWIW there's no need for data loss when you ditch the server, just download the encrypted data and decrypt using a clean environme
796.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
>It's as though someone just finished explaining why vaccines are believed not to cause autism, and you respond "actually, this particular study you cited surveyed 924 people, not a thousand like you said. Looks like the pro-va
797.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Mark Kern is a gamergater primarily known for his really bad takes, this is not a hasty generalization. >brand the whole thing as a "ridiculous conspiracy theory"? Oh no, I just stopped reading after I reached the ridiculous co
798.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
>It's odd that NordVPN, VikingVPN and Torguard all got their private keys leaked here. Good reminder to set up FDE and not give your host logins for your servers. Unexpected reboots are rare enough that they're worth switching
799.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
> Being illegal is a hard life with constant risk and lack of access to many things It's a hard life in the US, often with access to even less things than illegal immigrants have here. Not sure what this "constant risk" is
800.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
> Access to housing would be restricted to sublets with multiple roommates, who are also in the same illegal immigrants. Nobody has ever checked my immigration status while renting in the EU, nobody has ever cared about the fact that I
801.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
This is only one problem of many, so I definitely don't expect pointing this out to do anything to change your situation. >There are immigration requirements I cannot meet If you could vastly improve your life by moving, why would y
802.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
If you're moving because you're probably going to die if you don't, does it really matter whether or not you're doing so legally or not? It's really easy to remain in EU forever as an illegal immigrant, in some plac
803.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
If the general public doesn't care, are the damages really significant?
804.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
It sounds like the logical conclusion of this is that police should go door-to-door searching everywhere in case they might discover more unabombers. I don't think this is a good idea, as in the whole history of the world only one of
805.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
It appears this guy actually profited 5k, he started out with 5k and withdrew 10k before his account was closed. As it appears that RH isn't going to go after him for the negative balance, that's free money. So maybe it is foolpro
806.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Based on his post history they closed the account and never contacted him, but who knows what they might do in the future. Perhaps the debt can/will be sold to a collector at some point? https://www.reddit.com/user/
807.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
How does that make any sense in this context?
808.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
Ok, but that's not generally what sedition means
809.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
>Where is the fascism? It's the part where they jail people for "sedition" instead of misuse of funds. One of these is absolutely defensible while the other simply isn't.
810.
▲
by
FDSGSG
7y ago
So what do you think "sedition" means?
More ›