> It isnt possibly India. It's just as much "possibly India" as it's "possibly China", there's literally zero evidence (circumstantial or not) suggesting that

> It isnt possibly India. It's just as much "possibly India" as it's "possibly China", there's literally zero evidence (circumstantial or not) suggesting that the post originated from either. > could be due to Chinese influence Completely different from the suggestion that the post was literally made in China. I'm sure absolutely nobody doubts that this post was made due to Chinese influence, it is the claim that the post physically originated from China which I find fundamentally ridiculous.