EmilyHughes

7 ms·

31.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
They basically saved Java when they bought it, tons of great features and quick updates nowadays. There was almost zero innovation for about a decade while it was with Sun.
32.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Correct. That's why this game is 3D and not 1D.
33.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
If you have more trust in a shady private company than your own government it's time to move to another country.
34.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
You would always be able to switch to whatever service you like for further messaging, a non-profit the wouldn't care about keeping you on their app. Why would you have intimate conversations on a dating site anyway.
35.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
You people take it to far. I am not talking about some dystopian government that forces marriages to create some kind of super-citizen. I just want the incentive of making profit removed and provide a decent service that does what it promis
36.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
I don't get it. Why does no government anywhere run a non-profit dating site from tax-payer money when this is becoming the most popular way people are meeting? All the options people have are using toxic apps which entire business mod
37.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
It's still stupid. This is like asking DALL-E to generate an image that solves a math equation step by step. Of course this is easier for a human to do. Try getting a landscape in the style of vincent van gogh for 10$ on fiver though.
38.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Yeah man, great take. Should we drop a nuke on a city or open source DALL-E ? Seems about equally destructive.
39.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
I also don't dig the look of these apps compared to the clean GUI of Windows 2000 for example. I understand everything needs to be big and vectorized because of 4k displays, touchscreens and whatever else, but it always feels like thes
40.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
These particle physics are still needed. We generally assume the dream you have at night does not take place within a whole universe, yet it is still governt by some rules - for example you may experience gravity within your dream and under
41.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Sounds good because it seems like it explains what our reality is, but it really doesn't. It just pushes the fundamental problem up X simulations into the supposed "real reality". It also assumes that simply simulating a univ
42.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Only the arabic ones look decent. The latin ones remind me of word cliparts.
43.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
That's my point. OP reduced the effectivenes of psychedelics down to just being able to feel good for a short while. Well do some cocaine and you'd feel great for about an hour but nobody cured their depression that way.
44.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
going by that logic cocaine and heroin should also treat depression in the same way, but they clearly don't.
45.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Particles and waves are mental. What was the dream you had last night made up of? Maybe you dreamt of running scientific experiments and finding atoms, would that get you any nearer to the metaphysical truth of what that particular dream is
46.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
yeah but in most cases it's better to just rewrite everything fresh. it's more of quick fix to me.
47.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Mostly migration of legacy programs probably, so companies can say they ported their stuff to java. It's stupid but companies do it.
48.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
What you call change is the concept impermanence in buddhism. You had an insight into impermanence.
49.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Why does everything have to be some kind "porn" nowadays. Does anybody seriously think this is funny?
50.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
No it doesn't - that's my daily routine. I just microdose on some days on top of it.
51.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
You could argue that. there is no clear line of course, but most people would agree that a beer influences them more than aspirin or an antibiothic.
52.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Anything that influences your psyche in an obvious way.
53.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
easier said than done. But you are right of course, that's where you want to go.
54.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
psychoactive drugs are a whole different category. You bring your whole mental baggage with you when you take them, unlike aspirin.
55.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
sure, it's just the cherry on top on some days. You don't microdose and lay on your couch eating McDonalds, would feel wrong to me. Stacking all the good stuff has a nice synergy.
56.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
depends on your individual sensitivity to psychedelics, 0.2 would be too much for me to go into work, no visuals but a head trip. I also know plenty of people who can take 0.5 and don't feel much.
57.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
It can be a "party drug" if you dose low, especially if you are chilling at a bar with friends. Just pushes you into a slightly better mood. I'll rather have a microdose with some beers than getting shitfaced drunk, feels sub
58.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Trust me I tried all kinds of drugs and psychedelics are not the kind that get you hooked. Stimulants are especially addictive in my opinion. Psychs are the kind of drugs you say I have enough for a while if you overdo. On top of it they bu
59.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
Been doing it for some months on & off, this shit is legit. Altough 0,5g has me tripping so I rarely dose above 100 milligrams. Get up early, do a workout, take cold shower, meditate and then pop a microdose shrooms, feels great. Microd
60.
by EmilyHughes 4y ago
It's adding nothing to the physical laws - it's metaphysics.

More ›