DrThunder

14 ms·

91.
by DrThunder 3y ago
There are multiple scientific studies show the positive affects of meditation and a myriad of health benefits.... I'm not sure what "gurus" you're seeing but it's not really relevant to objective studies that show i
92.
by DrThunder 3y ago
It's positive in the same way eating a bunch of sugary donuts gives you a temporary short lasting dopamine boost. It's easily digestible with zero nutritional value. Rapid videos in succession short video formats that inject you w
93.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Imagine defending this. Every comment you make is just reinforcing my point. It's hilarious to watch you fumble around with this. If you base a law on subjective feelings towards words said you do not have free speech. I'll say it
94.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Whether they should or shouldn't be addressed by a GD is irrelevant. They are addressed by a GP in many circumstances. There are not enough psychiatrists around to cover everyone. Your point is moot. The system is not set up to push th
95.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yeah it's actually refreshing.
96.
by DrThunder 3y ago
"As I mentioned before, reputable establishments typically mandate concurrent therapy" But, this is objectively false. Are you trying to say a GD is not "reputable"? Like I said, you can go directly to a GD almost anywhe
97.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yeah I had a couple rough years with panic attacks, high anxiety state (always been anxious but not to that level). What you start to realize is that you are actually scared of the anxiety itself, not the situations so much. So, you sort of
98.
by DrThunder 3y ago
This is the wrong approach imo. Therapy, lifestyle changes, learning to cope with it without meds should always be the first line treatment. More and more, you see the approach of just handing out meds like candy with a small mention that y
99.
by DrThunder 3y ago
"depends on the person harassed FEELING harassed." That's my point bud. You don't believe in the 1st amendment, that's the problem, not the interpretation of the law. You cannot have free speech and have a law that
100.
by DrThunder 3y ago
They don't. There was a time when government eschewed social media entirely even though it was available. They're not private businesses and I see no reason for them to be using social media in any official capacity. There are ple
101.
by DrThunder 3y ago
The source was literally the law. If you want to gaslight people into believing it doesn't say what it does maybe you need to look internally at why you're doing that. Why does it upset you that this law is being scrutinized? I ha
102.
by DrThunder 3y ago
We don't need Alfalfa? Is the claim here that this agriculture is unnecessary. If so, then why is it happening. It seems to me that they'd go out of business if that's true at all. Just do it somewhere else is not an answer.
103.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Next time just man up and say you don't like what's being said instead of pretending you want sources. Pay attention to this part - "individual to FEEL terrorized, frightened, or18 threatened" This is a subjective law ba
104.
by DrThunder 3y ago
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/autistic-teenage... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/michigan-can-now-censor-yo...
105.
by DrThunder 3y ago
No... this is a police raid, that is the government. Secondly, the federal government has been breaking first amendment rights for the last 4 years at least; by pressuring social media companies to remove posts.
106.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yep, western Europe and Canada do not allow free speech. I just read a story about UK police showing up and arresting an autistic teenager because she commented online that one of their officers looked like a lesbian. You have Michigan pass
107.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Hopefully, but there are enough kids doing TikTok challenges like eating tide pods, jumping off boats going full speed, and asphyxiating themselves that I'm not sure on that.
108.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yeah but imagine a future where everyone just learns directly from AI as they're developing. We know it's wrong because our parents/guardians etc. told us it would be dangerous. I can see a future in a few generations where e
109.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yeah, didn't they find out McDonald's was making the temp so unreasonably hot that no human would even drink it at that temp? They were doing it so people didn't ask for refills as quickly and it would save money on coffee.
110.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Eh... I would never purchase one myself but they have some good use cases. They're great for schools because kids always break devices and they're cheap to get replacement parts for. They're also quite easy to use for web bro
111.
by DrThunder 3y ago
"Western Nations" You do realize the US doesn't have the public transport of massive cities in western Europe right? Maybe think a bit and you'll realize that Americans have to drive more to get places. Regardless, the c
112.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Yes, USA is denial while your pad your stats by only mentioned a handful of western European nations.
113.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Oh the results of colonialism 'Canada, Australia, New Zealand' and the countries brought to power specifically due to the US 'Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan'? Yes, let's just conveniently alter the stats by l
114.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Huh? "First, two young people have their lives taken when car drivers crash into them. It’s astounding to me that Americans accept this constant death and destruction as part of a transportation system." Are there countries that d
115.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Paths in the US are usually multi-use. Almost no where has a dedicated bike lane, and if they do it's just a line on the side of the road. If you're going to be speeding along at 20mph the side of the road works just fine.
116.
by DrThunder 3y ago
That sounds like a motorway.
117.
by DrThunder 3y ago
There are versions of Windows that do not have the bloat issue. Enterprise or Education are good options.
118.
by DrThunder 3y ago
Is this any better than decrapifier? https://community.spiceworks.com/scripts/show/4378-windows-1...
119.
by DrThunder 3y ago
In order for you to subjectively label it terrible you need to present a bad outcome from the design. Evolutionary/objectively, it's not a bad design.
120.
by DrThunder 3y ago
NO... something going 20mph + that easily doesn't belong on a pedestrian bike path either. I've seen way too many zooming by me and my infant in a stroller at speeds that are too dangerous to be on paths. If it has a motor it belo

More ›