3 ms·
Imagine defending this. Every comment you make is just reinforcing my point. It's hilarious to watch you fumble around with this. If you base a law on subjectiv
by DrThunder 3y ago
Imagine defending this. Every comment you make is just reinforcing my point. It's hilarious to watch you fumble around with this. If you base a law on subjective feelings towards words said you do not have free speech. I'll say it again, you are an authoritarian and anti-free speech. Just own up to it. It is going to jail on a whim because you can't EVEN DEFINE WHAT THE HARASSMENT IS. What constitutes evidence of harassment?
- daveguy 3y agoSeriously? You again? Here's the federal definition: https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment And since you don't seem to be a big reader, I'll point out the passage that makes you look most like a fool. > Petty slights, annoyances, and isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to the level of illegality. To be unlawful, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to reasonable people. Every time you respond you look more and more like a demagogic tool. Now run along.