4 ms·
"depends on the person harassed FEELING harassed." That's my point bud. You don't believe in the 1st amendment, that's the problem, not the interpretation of t
by DrThunder 3y ago
"depends on the person harassed FEELING harassed."
That's my point bud. You don't believe in the 1st amendment, that's the problem, not the interpretation of the law. You cannot have free speech and have a law that bases prison time on subjective FEELINGS by the victim. You cannot be that dumb, therefore you're malicious in intent and gaslighting me. You're an authoritarian and anti-1st amendment and that's why this is hard for you to understand. There's no "twisting" going on other than your belief system.
The irony here is you're just proving what I originally said every time you comment. Free speech rights are no longer respected and you're just living proof of the trend.
If I might go to jail on the whim of how a person feels towards what I say on a specific day because they're in a bad mood then the 1st amendment doesn't exist.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- daveguy 3y agoEvidence of harassment is still required. If a person doesn't feel harassed there is no victim. So yes, FEELING harassed is a requirement. That's not the same as going to jail on a whim. You complete moron.
- DrThunder 3y agoImagine defending this. Every comment you make is just reinforcing my point. It's hilarious to watch you fumble around with this. If you base a law on subjective feelings towards words said you do not have free speech. I'll say it again, you are an authoritarian and anti-free speech. Just own up to it. It is going to jail on a whim because you can't EVEN DEFINE WHAT THE HARASSMENT IS. What constitutes evidence of harassment?
- daveguy 3y agoSeriously? You again? Here's the federal definition: https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment And since you don't seem to be a big reader, I'll point out the passage that makes you look most like a fool. > Petty slights, annoyances, and isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to the level of illegality. To be unlawful, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to reasonable people. Every time you respond you look more and more like a demagogic tool. Now run along.