CogitoCogito

10 ms·

61.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> Well it's not just indicative of that. It's also indicative of the lack of regulation for something that didn't exist previously. The shops could exist in a less-unpleasant way... just, nobody has forced them to yet. It&
62.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
This is at least the second time in this thread you've said something like an official act can't violate someone's constitutional rights "by definition". I'm wondering what definition you refer to. That said, i
63.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> How do you study mind-altering drugs when every clinical-trial participant knows they’re tripping? Are there really no protocols for research in which participants can tell whether they have received a certain drug or not? I mean sure
64.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Yeah I'm having trouble understanding how /u/db48x's logic doesn't apply equally well to all political systems. Maybe the next time someone complains to me about Biden's policies, I should just respond that the
65.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Apple should just sell those crates to anyone for a reasonable markup. Then those people can provide repair services to others independent of any oversight of Apple.
66.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> So the ones who are not producing any kids by choice are consciously offloading their old-age care and hence act selfishly. When my father was dying, I out of all his children was able to help him the most since I don't have child
67.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
It's interesting to see this comment downvoted. I'm honestly curious as to the thinking here. How are parents having kids because they want them not acting selfishly?
68.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
How haven't these problems _always_ existed? What do they have to do with drop in overall population? If change is the problem, then both population growth and movement of populations are already problems and always have been.
69.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Are you saying it's selfish to not have kids? Other than accidental parents, I've never met any who didn't have kids because they wanted them. How were they not acting selfishly?
70.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I’m pretty sure all Western European countries have been multi-ethnic for the last 25 years. Certainly all I’ve had any experience with (Sweden, Germany, France, UK, maybe more).
71.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Yes and such a system makes hiring so much easier because mistakes cost much less. But the US ties things like healthcare to employment so a company that has a reputation for firing people after hiring them (however legitimate) would probab
72.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> The future envisioned by DRM is an attempt to deal with the problem of copying through structural rather than legal means. Would an update to the law restrict DRM by putting transferability requirements in place (that is, any DRM schem
73.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I wouldn’t go so far as to say that US media should be owned by Americans, but I do wonder if it makes sense to allow foreigners to have ownership if their own countries don’t allow the same kinds of rights as well. Bringing China up, I don
74.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I’m not totally seeing your point. Being paid allows you to spend more money. I agree with that statement. Many countries have managed to separate healthcare coverage from your current employment status with better results and at lower cost
75.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I understand that. That’s exactly the problem.
76.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I think the real problem is that in the US health insurance is tied to employment.
77.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> Like many NLRB administrative law judges, the judge here has done nothing outside of work for the NLRB. It is no surprise that he found a violation here and it will also be no surprise when he is overturned on appeal. Are you making th
78.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I can't give you a clear answer, but this seems to have all the case history: https://www.nlrb.gov/case/19-CA-297441 And the document "Administrative Law Judges Decision" in that case history seems to be
79.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I got my current job from it. No idea which experience is more typical.
80.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
The git book has a good section on the intervals of git which helps you understand the program overall: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Plumbing-and-Po...
81.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
The freedom to roam in Sweden and Norway is already limited and not absolute. No one supporting such freedoms had been arguing the freedom should be unlimited. You never needed to make this point because it was obvious to everyone in the co
82.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Sounds like a good thing: > The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school received 54,008 applications for the class of 2028, according to the Harvard Crimson, the campus newspaper. The undergraduate college at Harvard University accepted 1,
83.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
> Freedom to roam does not need to be freedom to enter people's garden. At least in Norway, the law requires you to stay a minimum distance from dwellings, and has a variety of requirements to ensure you're not a nuisance. Swed
84.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Do you only support laws if there exist no downsides no matter how small? Has there ever been any such law? That said, if we don’t companies engaging in those kinds of practices, it seems more practical to ban those practices than to remove
85.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I’m confused why you think this would put you at increased risk. You are allowed to defend yourself against threats today. Why do you think that would change? Though you are also speaking as if people camping on your land away from your dwe
86.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
We’re talking people walking across or camping on your land and in both cases staying away from any residences where people actually live. How would you even know someone is trafficking?
87.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
So if the law were changed to remove said liability, you would support a freedom to roam in the US?
88.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Are the arguments wrong?
89.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
Why?
90.
by CogitoCogito 2y ago
I’m personally fine with it.

More ›