Beltiras

37 ms·

391.
by Beltiras 7y ago
In my opinion Scott was really generous even answering. Horan makes no attempt at supporting his claim that QC will move us closer to midnight on the Doomsday Clock.
392.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Redundancy. Failure should always be an option. Specific answers will depend on your stack. Nobody will be able to monitor and react like you will because all IT solutions are their own species of butterfly with their own intricacies. If up
393.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I think this just has to be the clearest instance of "old man yells at cloud" in the history of publishing.
394.
by Beltiras 7y ago
There were friendly generational relations? o.O
395.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Sibling comment has the info. This is not an increase in energy efficiency just conversion efficiency. You pump in more amperes over the same voltage and manage to split twice the amount of water with the same size array. Still great thou.
396.
by Beltiras 7y ago
At that point you have that choice. If the software was proprietary you only have the migrate option.
397.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I've never ever seen such a brutal sentence in science before: "In summary, unlike the objections of the IBM group, so far I’ve found Gil’s objections to be utterly devoid of scientific interest or merit." Yikes.
398.
by Beltiras 7y ago
You can make a problem that is hard to compute but easy to verify. You can also go by known big-oh computation complexity estimates how long it would take you on a classical computer. Not too hard to prove.
399.
by Beltiras 7y ago
What is the test for being a journalist? Serious question.
400.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I think we all know why Hans Reiser isn't there.
401.
by Beltiras 7y ago
The flaw in that is the when you clause ends with something that usually is ambiguous or taken the wrong way can flare up an argument. I am a bit rusty in the theory since it's more than a decade since I took the course but the other f
402.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I actually started out thinking Blizzard could do nothing to redeem themselves. What level of action would make me believe they could be a trusted honest actor on the cultural stage given the capitulation to CCP interest? I cancelled my WoW
403.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I'm still on the fence. I'm still boycotting. I've come around to the position thou that there are redeeming steps Blizz can take.
404.
by Beltiras 7y ago
My son-in-law has lived in China and confronted me about my boycott. His position is that the content in Blizz games is kinda subversive to the authoritarianism practiced by the CCP. No other gaming company has the breadth of socially refor
405.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Worse yet: electrons passing down into ground state will emit a photon. In essence, all we see ever is direct electrical activity.
406.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I've yet to experience that. Been doing NVC for more than a decade. It helps a lot defusing tense situations. This example isn't very good. It shows the form but not the power.
407.
by Beltiras 7y ago
"When you didn't show up for our coffee date, I felt hurt. I need my time to be respected. Would you please show up on time or send me text letting me know you can't come?" More verbose for sure but clearer and more like
408.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Twitter leadership has shown they are not a good arbiter of truth. This is a sticky problem. While deplatforming does work for obvious instances of hate&exclusion, I'm not sure handing authoritarians the weapon of "they are si
409.
by Beltiras 7y ago
These feel ill formed NVC. If you lead with feeling the entire exchange becomes confrontational. First state unambiguous facts.
410.
by Beltiras 7y ago
There are 5 CVEs for 2.7 so far in 2019 [1]. [1]: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1021...
411.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Exactly.
412.
by Beltiras 7y ago
Then the headline should read something like "Breakthrough points to new physics". This is just a clickbait title. When you read the article it becomes clear that there's a lot of wishful thinking involved. Others have pointe
413.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I hate that title. Nothing violates laws of physics. It just means we need new laws.
414.
by Beltiras 7y ago
If anyone else balked at the pilot story, here it is (and it's a bit juicy): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Airlines_Flight_188
415.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I would think produces in this sense is the electrical output of the facility.
416.
by Beltiras 7y ago
That's a really good summary of the issue. Does your father-in-law have an opinion on if the MAX should fly again and what it would take to make it safe?
417.
by Beltiras 7y ago
That's a cheap patent. Especially given the timescale. Look at it this way. Can you find a lawyer to help shepherd a patent for 5 years and his/her fee is less then 10.000 dollars per year?
418.
by Beltiras 7y ago
The problem you are having (I think) is this damned phraseology we have grown accustomed to "in two places at once". That's not the proper way to think about it. Anything and everything can be in a superposition of location a
419.
by Beltiras 7y ago
As corporate responses go this one is pretty activist. Compare and contrast with other weasely statements made by other CEOs lately.
420.
by Beltiras 7y ago
I don't know if Blizz would consider me a whale but I did spend a pretty penny on their games and just deactivated my WoW subscription and uninstalled all their games from both my PC and phone. I'm not only doing that. I speak up

More ›