4 ms·
The problem you are having (I think) is this damned phraseology we have grown accustomed to "in two places at once". That's not the proper way to think about it
by Beltiras 7y ago
The problem you are having (I think) is this damned phraseology we have grown accustomed to "in two places at once". That's not the proper way to think about it. Anything and everything can be in a superposition of location and state where the location or state is not determined until forced to by some measurement/interaction. The universe if you will is not determined. It's in a superposition of states and positions to be later determined when acted upon.
- poelzi 7y agoYou are absolutely right. I personally have adopten the BSM-SG (developed by Dr. Stoyan Sarg) model which puts very strict limits on the superposition concept. No particle is ever at two places at once nor does it jump around. The model is however much much finer in it's structural organization. A neutrino for example is quite a large object from the BSM perspective. When a photon for example pumps the CL space volume occupied by a electron orbit, there is a limited time in which the CL is pumped in a way that the photon is existing as a complete structure anymore, but the electron is not yet pushed to a higher orbit. Chapter 7 in the book goes in very much detail of this. This uncertainty is very limited for is existence in time and very limited which processes can implement such uncertainties. From the BSM perspective, looking at the experimental setup, I can not really see, how this will prove uncertainty.