Aeolun

10 ms·

271.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Working on a chat app/server and protocol builder to support it, in an attempt to use as little network as possible (e.g. dial-up should work fine). It's heavily supported by Claude Code, but much fun. https://superchat
272.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Cool! Isometric for the win :)
273.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
With dependency injection your interface always describes what your implementation can do. If you see the interface and you have to care what is going to happen when you use it you are doing it wrong.
274.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
The trick is to have 3 terminals with Claude Code open at the same time. You won’t be able to follow more. Reviewing the stuff or plans written is harder than telling them to write it.
275.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Yeah, completely understand that viewpoint. It’s bizarre how many people hate it. Everything I can do with LLM’s is amazing.
276.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
It works perfectly! You can become the president of the (debatably) most powerful nation on earth by employing it successfully.
277.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Translation: Lets think about it before we do stupid shit.
278.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
When applied without thinking about why. Yes. Except dependency injection. I really can’t imagine why you’d ever not use that. I suppose it’s possible to overuse, but you’d still have better code than without. Certainly more testable code.
279.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
You think?
280.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I think the “I maintained this thing for 12 years” weighs a lot heavier than the “and then I even went through the trouble of reimplementing it” before changing it to a license that is more open. Seriously…
281.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I dunno, I’m inclined to think the WTFPL and MIT did more to help open source. And for a while during my youth there was indeed no distinction between publically accessible code and free and unencumbered code.
282.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I think all this shit is silly. If I could manage to figure out how the internet worked at 12, then so can my son. Or well, a bit younger, but it’s fine. He has at least one parent to guide him.
283.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
It’s also really cheap!
284.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Because working on things that go boom is like working on fireworks. The fact the end up on people is incidental.
285.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Haha, yeah. I wrote that, thought something was wrong, but I couldn’t put my finger on why. Figured it probably wasn’t important to the point :) But yeah, should have been Alexa
286.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I mean, you store as many as you need right? I’m sure 99% of the data is just immediately trashed. They have enough home videos of kids to not need to label them again, but those videos where someone is undressing in their bedroom will show
287.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Having just played it, you seem to have worked around the destruction problem by removing voxels one chunk at a time. But I’m still baffled by the sheer number on screen at the same time :)
288.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I think my school solves this by telling the parents to buy ‘something’ for the kids, as long as it has a webbrowser and keyboard.
289.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
What is the voxel resolution Voxile works at? Also, does it have a single world grid? (I saw you say octree somewhere) or many separate elements?
290.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
This isn’t actually true if you use GPU raytracing, as everyone involved with voxel destruction seems to realize at one point or another. Meshing in a performant way after every destruction event is simply not possible.
291.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Lobster doesn’t seem that different from Lua in that regard? I won’t say it isn’t impressive, but I’m having a hard time believing the hard part of this thing was calling from an interpreted to a static language. Edit: I was mistaken about
292.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I have had a great amount of fun prompting Claude with: “Lets play a choose your own adventure game. Give me a completely random scenario. I’ll be a xxxx.”
293.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
It’s basically management 101. But I’ve gone through that phase and come out the other end believing that outsourcing any of the functions that aren’t commodified enough to switch at a moment’s notice is a terrible idea.
294.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
I thought the map view was cool, but maybe not optimal to simulate hundreds of missiles and drones at the same time.
295.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
> In a functioning society Have you been alive for the past decade?
296.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Am I so cynical, or does this sound hopelessly naive? This is exactly what I would expect. Certainly of Meta. Amazon had to go out of their way to reassure people that Siri wasn’t always recording. And I’m still not entirely sure I believe
297.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
So it’s just a matter of time before the US crashes?
298.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
> I don't see how any rational investor could still see US companies as a secure investment I the problem is that from the companies’s side you just have a whole country to exploit, so I’m fairly certain the investments still work.
299.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
Because Altman says the deal is the same.
300.
by Aeolun 8mo ago
> minimally lethal The US and Israel are involved. The only way it’s going to turn out is maximally lethal to all those not involved at all. See… basically any military operation participated in by those nations in recent history. We got

More ›