67726e

24 ms·

151.
by 67726e 10y ago
I mean, Europe has been having issues with migrants. It's not unreasonable to avoid a known issue. America has been running quota and limits anyway.
152.
by 67726e 10y ago
Dunno why this is being downvoted. If your issue with IDEs are keyboard short-cuts, I guarantee you'll find a vim plugin, and if your contention is shortcuts in general then I'd really love to buy you a beer and hear your thoughts
153.
by 67726e 10y ago
> proposed banning Muslims from entry to the US I was actually at the rally when he announced this. Trump wants a freeze on immigration from countries that are actively producing a large number of jihadis which, surprise, happens to be p
154.
by 67726e 10y ago
The overall experience of using emacs is very dated. Again, for those who are not users of emacs it presents a deep burden. There is no barrier to entry in using a simple text editor, and a modern IDE brings that simplicity with additional
155.
by 67726e 10y ago
> How does this compare to what everyone with Emacs gets? I'm gonna sound snarky, but not everyone wants to use an ancient editor. I could just as well make a case for vim. I use vim over emacs, but I'd choose a nice IDE over e
156.
by 67726e 10y ago
My grandparents grew up and lived under Hitler. I was practically raised by my grandmother in fact, and I asked a lot of questions. To compare the two is an absolute joke. If you took any politician, I guarantee you could make comparisons.
157.
by 67726e 10y ago
Are you using a bleeding edge release? Why not pick a stable release and stick with it?
158.
by 67726e 10y ago
> Smart coders design elegant solutions that don't require frantic typing Two things. First, that's going to depend on coding style and how you operate. Personally I'll give great thought to the particular problem and then
159.
by 67726e 10y ago
What the article didn't seen to talk about is if this is still commonplace. I don't mean to lessen the disgusting situation but this did occur in the 40's, not recently as I had thought would be the case.
160.
by 67726e 10y ago
That's an incredibly subjective metric.
161.
by 67726e 10y ago
> The cost in publicity and good will would be catastrophic. So we're gonna excuse them funding terrorist because they run some madrasas? Maybe actually helping with the whole problem of Islamic terrorism would make up the good will
162.
by 67726e 10y ago
I could easily claim the same about the left after their golden child lost.
163.
by 67726e 10y ago
I mean, shit, Obama has consolidated a helluva lot of power. Has Americans killed extra-judicially. I don't call him Hitler.
164.
by 67726e 10y ago
That's one man's opinion.
165.
by 67726e 10y ago
I read the link. They were cleared several times on the given incident. Instead of taking a charitable approach you throw out your political bullshit.
166.
by 67726e 10y ago
I never once said that. In fact I asked for clarification on the incident but you seem unwilling to give that.
167.
by 67726e 10y ago
Given the numerous trials and inquests, include one which made sure to include members of the community, it certainly seems ambiguous. I'll ignore the fact that I mentioned head of state for the purposes of discussion, but what in your
168.
by 67726e 10y ago
I hadn't quite considered that. I suppose that very well might count, though I was particularly thinking in the domestic sense.
169.
by 67726e 10y ago
Again, Castro went about killing or jailing all those who opposed him. My original statement was that no US president has done so.
170.
by 67726e 10y ago
> I guess the people massacred at that MSF hospital were terrorists, too. That wasn't a drone strike. That was an accidental attack by an AC-130 gunship. I'm sure folks in Yemen or Afghanistan are a political threat to Obama. R
171.
by 67726e 10y ago
Killing terrorists does not put you on the same level as Castro.
172.
by 67726e 10y ago
Do tell, when is the last time a sitting US president has murdered his political opponents?
173.
by 67726e 10y ago
> I'll also bear the consequences and not whine like a baby. You are using a throwaway account. Clearly you are not willing to be beholden to your words online despite advocating for us to do us.
174.
by 67726e 10y ago
See, this is where it's clear that you're trolling to push your agenda. I don't discriminate at work, full stop. I don't care what you do or who you screw so long as it doesn't affect folks at work. The second you s
175.
by 67726e 10y ago
By it's very nature, trying to get him fired involves work. If you're trying to cause strife in the workplace that's fireable in my book.
176.
by 67726e 10y ago
I'm talking about trolling because you're using a throwaway account. That's a bright red-flag if I've ever seen one. That said, is he professional at work? If he does his job and doesn't discuss shit at work, that&#
177.
by 67726e 10y ago
Looks like you're going to troll with a throwaway account, but I'll bite. Does he express his views at work or somewhere else? If he's professional at work, I don't give a shit what he thinks.
178.
by 67726e 10y ago
I've always heard that many folks often had more stringent ROEs in Iraq and Afghanistan. How does this mesh with the notion of a trigger-happy cop?
179.
by 67726e 10y ago
Every race had been subjugated violently by another. Claiming one deserves special treatment is itself racist. Ask yourself this: Would the situation with the tweets be reversed if someone from the Barbary coast, which has a history of whit
180.
by 67726e 10y ago
You realize that white Americans were not the only folks to own slaves or oppress a people, right? Ask yourself this, would the results be different if I tweeted that from the Barbary coast were roles were largely reversed? How about from a

More ›