47282847

23 ms·

391.
by 47282847 1y ago
Ok, so you feel not heard with what you wrote, and thus assumed I didn’t read what you wrote. Sounds like you feel attacked by my perspective, and misunderstood. And then turned it completely unnecessarily into an insinuation. I understand
392.
by 47282847 1y ago
> I'm pointing out the reality to people claiming that "oh it's so easy to maintain any kind of hobbies and/or social life without spending a penny". Not any, but a sufficiently large amount of options. You may n
393.
by 47282847 1y ago
This sounds beautiful. Thank you for sharing. I think Jealousy is a useful and important emotional state in society, and to wish it away and suppress it only makes it show up in violent ways. Like all emotions, if we allow and appreciate (a
394.
by 47282847 1y ago
I understand where this is coming from but that argument simply doesn’t make sense. There are many ways to give back to society; providing low-status jobs is only one of them. And a poor one, because it locks people in that status and heter
395.
by 47282847 1y ago
In my experience roaming many different groups, the ones who do not signal status typically are the most powerful/influental. Their membership is safe; they don’t need to signal status, or rather, signaling it draws too much attention
396.
by 47282847 1y ago
Deserves a black bar!
397.
by 47282847 1y ago
Works for me as a German, online since 96. Oh please yes create a version that applies to your cultural background and how you experienced the net!
398.
by 47282847 1y ago
As a fellow purpose-seeker: what did you end up doing instead that brought you more sense of utility?
399.
by 47282847 1y ago
One is religious freedom, the other is science. You pick which is which. ;)
400.
by 47282847 1y ago
“don’t look up!“
401.
by 47282847 1y ago
Lure, or rescue?
402.
by 47282847 1y ago
> They are all tools that enable work. I don’t see AI being categorically different. You don’t see the difference between a self-contained product, and a foreign subscription service with no influence over what it is delivering and the p
403.
by 47282847 1y ago
Psychiatrists oversee treatment and give medication. They don’t do psychotherapy, so they are not in the business of offering EMDR. Easily confused but very distinct jobs.
404.
by 47282847 1y ago
Many PTSD patients have difficulty with being touched (understandably). Even self-touch can be difficult if the own body is not emotionally felt as safe. Devices like this could be useful here as a bridge towards being touched.
405.
by 47282847 1y ago
I see no disagreement; just a different focus. One is aimed at my own realm of influence, what can I do to make the best out of it, the other is more around the other person and what they may or may not experience.
406.
by 47282847 1y ago
Share your thoughts. Ask and you will know. Or don’t, and move on, knowing that you don’t know, without the need to judge the other. There is no reason to “drive yourself crazy“ with your thoughts. We all make assumptions, and then we can c
407.
by 47282847 1y ago
I am not talking about startups but classic entrepreneurship in non-tech areas, and it may be our definitions of growth also differs. From a systemic perspective, I am not a fan of cancerous growth. Not all growth is positive for the partic
408.
by 47282847 1y ago
You _think_ them asking questions is a way to show interest. Their way to express interest may be different and non-verbal. A lot of people ask questions but are not actually interested and only pretend to listen. You confuse your interpret
409.
by 47282847 1y ago
It is up to you to interpret it as a “signal to move on“ or not. You may be right, but you may also be totally wrong with your interpretation. It’s not a definitive signal nor means they are not “expressing interest“. You may simply not see
410.
by 47282847 1y ago
You could equally well turn the question around: why are they driving you crazy? They’re just socialized differently. You cannot change other people, you can only change yourself. Meaning, if it bothers you, why not develop strategies that
411.
by 47282847 1y ago
You claimed working costs you. You’re free to have that perspective but I think it is unfortunate and does not contribute to one’s well being. You can, simply for your own benefit, decide to take a different view on it, without having to ch
412.
by 47282847 1y ago
Hardly anyone would work if the downsides outweighed their personal benefit. Actually, some people decide not to. It’s a trade-off that I’m personally happy to take by working. I enjoy my benefits. Feel free to quit! If it would cost me mor
413.
by 47282847 1y ago
> Working should never cost you money. And that’s the case as long as the income tax is at or less than 100%. Income taxes could well be collected from employers directly and never reach you (like some European countries do for roughly 5
414.
by 47282847 1y ago
I see the value in investing in and benefiting from the growth of a global economy. I despise having to do it in a way that only makes the large companies larger; real economic growth for me lies in small independent entrepreneurship, not i
415.
by 47282847 1y ago
A dating app should gently guide you through processing your childhood bonding experiences, less helpful core beliefs (easy to quiz you about and refine a local analysis; no need to collect/share), reprocess previous relationships and
416.
by 47282847 1y ago
Firefox: open about:config and add ui.prefersReducedMotion as a Number and set it to 0 (no) or 1 (yes) to override the OS setting. Chrome: command line switch: --force-prefers-reduced-motion --force-prefers-no-reduced-motion
417.
by 47282847 1y ago
> The free internet is built on ads. I still believe in the free internet. The internet I remember had free content because mostly individuals wanted to share something. Commercial offers were rare. I would be very happy to go back to th
418.
by 47282847 1y ago
Personally, I want projects I like to survive, and drawing attention to them is one way to attempt to contribute to that, for not-exclusively-but-primarily egoistic reasoning.
419.
by 47282847 1y ago
Because most public companies have been surviving wars just fine so far in history? I also didn’t say anything about US stocks specifically. I consider it irrational to only invest in one geographic region. It is simply a historical fact th
420.
by 47282847 1y ago
Sources? Or assumption? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Similar_l...

More ›