2 ms·
In my experience roaming many different groups, the ones who do not signal status typically are the most powerful/influental. Their membership is safe; they don
by 47282847 1y ago
In my experience roaming many different groups, the ones who do not signal status typically are the most powerful/influental. Their membership is safe; they don’t need to signal status, or rather, signaling it draws too much attention (annoyances by those seeking to gain status by affiliation). I remember reading a study about this some years back to find my own findings confirmed.
The people I know with a net worth over 10m do not display it. Why would they want to. It only has downsides and no upside. Same applies to other forms of status/rank/belonging.
(Not contradicting your points, merely adding to them.)
If you want to experiment with that, try to NOT match other people’s style AND radiate a deep sense of security/belonging/entitlement. Do not hide your (other) insecurities; those with status don’t have to hide their authenticity. This may sound like a contradiction at first, but you can develop an universal sense of belonging that remains authentic. You will be surprised which people will suddenly find you to talk with you, once you stop seeking their attention.
- mpweiher 1y ago> the ones who do not signal status > AND radiate a deep sense of security/belonging/entitlement. That's also signaling status. "Don’t be so humble — you’re not that great" -- Golda Meir. And of course: "You cannot not communicate" -- Paul Watzlawick