13years

19 ms·

211.
by 13years 3y ago
> The most important skill in a rapidly changing world is the ability to learn new skills This is what AI is. It is a skill learning machine that can outpace your ability to learn given enough training data. The answer of just learning a
212.
by 13years 3y ago
Some potential evidence of its persuasive effects. https://phys.org/news/2023-03-ai-generated-arguments-minds-c...
213.
by 13years 3y ago
On the grand scale we are definitely on an acceleration technological curve. And by that I mean humanity and all technology not constrained to only AI. AI might hit some walls, there may be a lot of hype at the moment, but it has already br
214.
by 13years 3y ago
Your team won't be needed anymore. Your boss won't be needed anymore. Furthermore, whatever product or service your company provides, won't be needed anymore. This is the progression of AI. To be the provider of everything in
215.
by 13years 3y ago
> For the next two years nothing is worthless. More like many things will become obsolete, but becoming worthless is a longer slower process as existing methods are phased out.
216.
by 13years 3y ago
I don't disagree. However, those who believe we are still on the accelerating curve also believe that somehow we will remain relevant. It doesn't make logical sense. So, the only counter to my argument is that we hit a wall. This
217.
by 13years 3y ago
Seems many have no concept of exponential growth as this is the correct answer. The goal of everyone building AI is to reach AGI, if that is achievable, there is no last 10% or 1%.
218.
by 13years 3y ago
It only has to reach the level of AGI. That is the goal of AI. Nonetheless, AI researchers predict exponential will include reaching some level of ASI.
219.
by 13years 3y ago
Rather than seeing the rise of AI as a threat to my career, I now view it as an opportunity to augment my skills and deliver even greater value to my clients. By embracing AI tools like ChatGPT, I can automate routine tasks and focus my ef
220.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, I've described it in the article above as "Climbing the skill ladder is going to look more like running on a treadmill at the gym. No matter how fast you run, you aren’t moving, AI is still right behind you learning everythin
221.
by 13years 4y ago
Agree. All historical comparison to prior disruptions are invalid. The reason they are invalid, is that all prior disruptions were narrow, were followed by periods of stabilization that allowed people to plan and reason about their lives. A
222.
by 13years 4y ago
Because although AI systems are currently still "hallucinating" incorrect facts in their answers, they are already delivering remarkable results in tasks such as translation, classification, creative writing and generating code.
223.
by 13years 4y ago
In the event you are curious later, one of the problems with this is what I call the AI Bias Paradox. Essentially asserts that the AI will always be biased similarly as we are biased. Just some thoughts here you might find interesting. htt
224.
by 13years 4y ago
> A reasonably reliable source of information can be subject to scrutiny and doubt, can have clear biases, can sometimes even be diametrically opposed to your own moral and ethical values. I think we have arrived back very close to my or
225.
by 13years 4y ago
False choice. Your implication would be that it is ok to lead us into foreign wars under false pretenses because statistically NYT might be better by some measure than Steve's Blog. I reject that notion in its entirety. It is precisely
226.
by 13years 4y ago
NYT is in the class of elite professional level bias and they certainly are not without their issues. This isn't to say they are more biased than other notable publications, but that they all have this quality and use professional lang
227.
by 13years 4y ago
There is still progress to be made in boosting public awareness about the unique harm derived from AI-generated propaganda. For example, several mainstream news outlets circulated the fake photos of Trump without overlaying a watermark of
228.
by 13years 4y ago
That is not evidence against bad behavior, that is more evidence of bad behavior. I agree that Musk has not honored his original intent. He has already broken in many ways the transparency pledge and free speech principles. Yet, these were
229.
by 13years 4y ago
Whenever we get to see behind the corporate veil, we often find companies don't abide by laws. How many companies failed this year hiding nefarious activities? Also, what types of behavior did we get a glimpse of from the Twitter Files
230.
by 13years 4y ago
For all the fears of AGI, these are the more concrete nefarious uses we can actually reason about. It is a point I often make that we don't need AGI for AI to already become very disturbing in its potential use. The other point, is tha
231.
by 13years 4y ago
The societal ramifications of such advancements are potentially very disturbing. What I've recently written on the topic myself ... Human to human bonds are going to be more broken than ever before. There is going to be a great appeal
232.
by 13years 4y ago
> that frees me up to produce other things for society The problem is that it is a disruption for everything because at its core it is a machine for the replication of skill and technology. A concept that has never existed prior with any
233.
by 13years 4y ago
Why are there no social media platforms that give the users more power over what they want the system to show them? For example, this suggestion I posted on the Twitter algo https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm&#x2F
234.
by 13years 4y ago
We need to ban TikTok because they might be spying on you. Solution: a bill that allows us to spy on you unconditionally for all activities, anywhere, anytime for any reason. Also, we will be immune to FOIA or any kind of oversight. More li
235.
by 13years 4y ago
I'm just amazed that no social media has really attempted to put what you view in mostly the control of users. I put forward this suggestion to Twitter, I doubt they will use it, but it is currently ranked 4th by up votes. https:&#x2F
236.
by 13years 4y ago
The last “civilization-ending technology” – atomic energy – has been the subject of intense governance and extreme care on behalf of its engineers, Russell said. Even less charged technology fields, like aviation, are meticulously regulate
237.
by 13years 4y ago
So, I gave it a try today. Was hopeful, because on Twitter all my posts go essentially into the void. However, Substack Notes seems to have no method for discovery. They add some random larger accounts to my feed. You can't search Note
238.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ends in 2050.1(dakara.substack.com)
2 points by 13years 4y ago|0 comments
239.
by 13years 4y ago
> If it's relatively easy today, and that's proof that it's not difficulty of attacking that's saving us. It could be perceived that way, but the argument is also that if it becomes easy enough, some actors will part
240.
by 13years 4y ago
> The teams defending against attacks will be able to trivially apply LLMs Who are these imaginary teams defending against attacks? How does the LLM defend against another human who plans to target something that is not a LLM? > if yo

More ›