3 ms·

I don't disagree. However, those who believe we are still on the accelerating curve also believe that somehow we will remain relevant. It doesn't make logical s

I don't disagree. However, those who believe we are still on the accelerating curve also believe that somehow we will remain relevant. It doesn't make logical sense. So, the only counter to my argument is that we hit a wall. This is very possible, but AI development thus far is certainly increasing the unpredictability of future events. As we move forward we are in some sense understanding it less. The disparity over the definition of AGI is only increasing.

circuit10 3y ago
There are definitely a lot of people who believe that we are still accelerating and as a result believe that we will either become irrelevant (but hopefully live in some kind of utopia) or all die (I guess I’m one of them, but I haven’t really accepted it on a deep level)
- 13years 3y ago
  On the grand scale we are definitely on an acceleration technological curve. And by that I mean humanity and all technology not constrained to only AI. AI might hit some walls, there may be a lot of hype at the moment, but it has already broken new ground and boundaries not previously thought possible. Unfortunately, many of those grounds already broken and proven are nefarious and dystopian uses. In the article I link above, I go into great detail on this topic. With all the concern of AGI (utopia/world ending) there is not much focus on the imminent impacts of primitive AI. They are no less concerning.