13years

18 ms·

241.
by 13years 4y ago
> How many autogpt scripts can trivialize taking down the power grid? Why does it need to be autogpt? It can rather create sophisticated plans for humans to exploit. Early nefarious use is more likely to go this route. > We'd hav
242.
by 13years 4y ago
> Let's be clear, AI is not making it easier. Technically, it is already easy without AI, in relative terms. > The idea you can't have some tireless force actively adapting to every single imaginable exploit isn't a giv
243.
by 13years 4y ago
Blue team has to imagine every possible exploit before it occurs for a system that is essentially black box, has unknown emergent behaviors and the input to the system is anything that can be described by human language. Who wants to take t
244.
by 13years 4y ago
AI regulations are crucial because they help ensure that AI is created and deployed in a safe, ethical, and societally useful manner. They can aid in the prevention of unexpected outcomes in decision-making processes, such as bias or discr
245.
by 13years 4y ago
Very good article. I think the recommendations are reasonable as there really isn't any alternative. Good pointers on where to get started. However, if you play this forward, it becomes increasing difficult to reason about. There are a
246.
by 13years 4y ago
Think about how it will feel to come up against a bot that can combine existing information in unexpected ways, in an instant, constantly absorbing and utilising any new fragment that's out there. What's the point of innovating a
247.
by 13years 4y ago
> Maybe we should think about replacing government with AI. I think that would be a mistake. It is seemingly apparent that a machine may be able to not have bias as it is just performing calculations. It is not emotional in its decisions
248.
by 13years 4y ago
Unfortunately, that will create its own set of problems, potentially making it even worse. Once AI becomes political, then all reasonable discourse will cease to exist. You will have a set of permanent proponents and opponents who will choo
249.
by 13years 4y ago
We still don't have any real understanding of how society adapts to this technology evolution. It is different than all prior technological disruptions as it has no period of adaption and stabilization to follow. It is continuous and a
250.
by 13years 4y ago
> personally, I'm far more worried about an epistemological crisis and corporate abuse than some AI singularity) These are the foremost issues I'm also concerned about. They are not necessarily significantly less concerning tha
251.
by 13years 4y ago
A feature proposal to put you in control of the algorithm https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/issues/1363
252.
Twitter “For you” content should be by user preference customizable(github.com)
4 points by 13years 4y ago|2 comments
253.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, I think those are possibilities. In simple terms, I think we will either be in control of power we are not prepared to manage or we will be managed by power that we can not control.
254.
by 13years 4y ago
Thank you! > because we’re fallible and often the systems we build are too Yes, the basis of my article is using the assumptions of the alignment theorists who believe that we can build an AGI and it will be by default "power seekin
255.
by 13years 4y ago
> The hardest issue regarding "AI alignment" is human alignment. Which is partly why the current proposed alignment theory isn't possible. We want to align the AGI by applying human values. Even if we figure out how to ge
256.
by 13years 4y ago
> stop brushing aside real solutions without any logical reason for doing so Sure, point me to the research papers and discourse on the solution you propose.
257.
by 13years 4y ago
> Alignment is impossible for AGI. I mean that was my original premise supported by my article I posted. I go into detail on the conceptual methods for alignment and their fallacies. When I state necessary, I don't imply the feasibi
258.
by 13years 4y ago
"Demonstrably unfriendly natural intelligence seeks to create provably friendly artificial intelligence."
259.
by 13years 4y ago
Alignment is necessary for AGI, but not always for narrowly scoped AI for specific purposes. However, it may be completely ineffective in that capacity.
260.
by 13years 4y ago
People already do all of these things: lie, cheat, steal, seek power, game the system. In order to counteract them, we have a variety of social mechanisms: laws and enforcement, reputation and social stigma, checks and balances, limitation
261.
by 13years 4y ago
> "we are managed by power we can not control" sounds like a step up from here, since we corrupt the things we can control. I think it is a very high risk gamble. At least some of problems that are described by alignment theory
262.
by 13years 4y ago
Depends on what is required for AGI/ASI. Some say we still need much more power, others think we are almost there. So, yes, unrealistic if we are almost there already.
263.
by 13years 4y ago
AGI is a continuation of what we have been doing. Technological advancements at a pace that surpasses our ability to reason about their effects on us and the world. I see two potential outcomes as most likely. We have control of power that
264.
by 13years 4y ago
I think we are trying to solve impossible scenarios and it simply is not productive. Alignment will be impossible. It is based on a premise that is a paradox itself. Furthermore, even if it were possible, there will be a hostile AI built on
265.
by 13years 4y ago
> Imagine being so naive you belive this could ever happen. Agreed, not a rational scenario > Also: imagine the year is 1900. You are saying that steam power and electricity is causing way too many changes way too fast so they put a m
266.
by 13years 4y ago
I agree to the point that it is totally unrealistic that it shuts down. There are no difficult barriers for entry into this space. No possible way of containment other than imposing hardware restrictions. However, it is indeed a shift, and
267.
by 13years 4y ago
I agree with the article on most points. That being a disproportionate amount of concern is on long term risk vs. what is happening right now.
268.
by 13years 4y ago
That has been somewhat my experience as well. I found ChatGPT sometimes to useful to provide a hint for something I don't know how to do. However, I never was able to get it to write a successful function for anything that would have b
269.
by 13years 4y ago
We already have more than enough problems with systems being too complex to understand. Indeed, aligns with my own thoughts on the impossibility of AI alignment. "However, each new layer and new tech that we add becomes a greater sep
270.
by 13years 4y ago
But that is not what the author stated. They didn't allude to a god like meaning. They cited utility as an example of meaning for which they had no association.

More ›