Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
0xBA5ED
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
This is wrong on so many levels. You are encouraging witch hunts based on fear and paranoia. Moderation is about maintaining order, not slapping down baddies. You could argue that one leads to the other, but it's the difference in mind
62.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
Does this give the ability to engineer cures for currently incurable diseases?
63.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
It's easy to think you could scrap a mature system and design a simpler one from the top down (or do a sweeping refactor). Sometimes this is true, but often you're simply overlooking years of edge cases and bug fixes that allowed
64.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>Maybe you just don't have much experience, or don't realize the vague descriptions police will use to bring folks in >but I'm guessing you haven't spent much time around the sort of person that gets stopped for th
65.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
"99.9999999%" means "almost always". It isn't a precise calculation, which you know. Just look at the US arrest statistics. See how many total arrests there are annually and ask yourself how many of those could be f
66.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>But it is easy to get thrown in jail. This is especially true if your skin isn't white enough: How many stories do you hear of folks being in jail for having the description, "Tall black male?". I'm sorry to break yo
67.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>I think it is much better that a few folks don't show up to trial than to criminalize being poor. >Why the heck would we put low-and-medium risk folks in jail, to be put in a position to lose their job, house, and freaking child
68.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
Be careful what you wish for. Rapid large-scale change is exciting perhaps, but not controllable. It is a recipe for sub-populations to slip through the cracks, increasing human suffering.
69.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
"float zero_to_one" is pretty short and obvious. The caller can maybe even guess by the context of the function name that it probably accepts 0 and 1.
70.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
If it's what they want, then not really.
71.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
My point is, you don't suddenly lose the ability to cook things when you don't have electricity, propane, or charcoal.
72.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
Then again, hurricanes provide a lot of readily available wood debris.
73.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>Not having anything other than your job is bad By "not having anything", I assume the OP is referring to things that give meaning. >And no matter how much meaning and happiness you believe you are getting This is awfully pr
74.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>1. Not having anything other than your job is bad. Full stop. Maybe a handful of persons can work in that situation, but having such a messed up work-life balance is bad for your health, there are plenty of studies on this. It's no
75.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
Dangerous? Yes. Did they know it would be fatal? I have no idea. It isn't clear that they were standing there with the intent to "keep watch while their colleague killed him". I don't believe they knew he would die. That
76.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
Police officers are humans, believe it or not. Some of them are bad and that will always be true. Regarding your unnecessary insult at the end: Grow up.
77.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
But "the police" didn't kill this specific person. A specific police officer did and he's in jail.
78.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>There are plenty of real scientific arguments against gay marriage or gay rights at large Such as? >You just dont ever hear them because everyone who ever so much as hints at them gets banned immediately. Then where do you hear them?
79.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
>...people are seriously considering 12 month style lockdowns to protect potentially as low as 1% of the population who are well past the good years of their life. "Good years" for who? The accumulation of experience, knowledge
80.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
6y ago
It is, however, common knowledge that calling that particular person orange is meant as an insult. No need to have a precise definition of "offensive" for cases like that.
81.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
Oh I've heard of this. It's called a defenestration of service attack.
82.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
>We’re thrilled to have the opportunity to reach far more people, with far more impact, than we ever could alone. A few sentences later: >The app will no longer be available for download [on android] Can anyone recommend a good altern
83.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
Now we're talking about the internet. When you get online, you're entering a public space. Being physically inside your house at the time is irrelevant IMO. You don't have to buy smart appliances either. Or apps to control yo
84.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
>who were reasonably likely to be your in-group with your best interests at heart Or at the very least, you were dealing with people who were _also_ not anonymous. It's a balance-of-power issue more than anything.
85.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
>It's not a "long-standing norm", it's a fundamental right In the U.S., anonymity is a "fundamental right" only in certain circumstances and it differs by state. It's not a blanket right. >Even in sm
86.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
At this point, there are enough systems working in parallel that fooling one of them, some of the time, doesn't seem worth the effort.
87.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
>I know this is probably a controversial opinion to non-meditators, but if you're going to downvote, at least provide an argument for why you don't agree. I'm guessing it's the pretense that you can simply teach anyon
88.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
Except the death rate is determined by deaths/cases, which relies on counting the cases.
89.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
Of course the lifeguard has extra context by just being in the same space with these people beforehand. They're probably already watching certain people more closely before the video starts while you and I enter the space cold (and thr
90.
▲
by
0xBA5ED
7y ago
>Like why doesn't Gates or Bezos give everyone a $100k bonus and keep a billion? Would be a neat social experiment. Give all your employees FU money and see how many show up the next day.
More ›