0xBA5ED

15 ms·

91.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
I'd vote for RAD. Random/Rapid Access Drive.
92.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Oh yeah, was thinking about gait. I don't doubt this at all. The heartbeat thing, I hadn't heard of though. Thanks.
93.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>A lot of these CV hacks work only on existing tech This is true for every countermeasure for every tech. Total covering of the face may be temporarily effective as well. Who knows, maybe it will become impossible to find a bike helmet t
94.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
This project would benefit greatly from a bulleted feature list with the best features at the top. The lofty goals should be _under_ that imo.
95.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
I'm guessing they were asking for some _specific_ features/techniques of Beef that contribute to achieving your design goal. The design goal itself is made very clear.
96.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
On the other hand, I wouldn't get offended if someone said a piece of my code indicated I was ignorant of something. If I was ignorant, I'd fess up to it no problem. Or if I had reasons for intentionally doing it a different way,
97.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>"The author of that post has a common misconception", which sounds like a passive-aggressive way to call someone dumb Not at all. It's a polite way to say they're ignorant of a particular thing. It would be rather in
98.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>I don’t understand is how they managed to either sit through or filter out this kind of chatter Short videos with specific titles, high like/dislike ratios that don't start with ultra fake enthusiasm. The back button is your f
99.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
No. It is explained. Self-evident even. There is nothing complicated or deep about why social hierarchies emerge.
100.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>I think the question "why there are social hierarchies" is the biggest open problem in social sciences This is not an open problem at all. It is a _well_ explained phenomenon.
101.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Right. I'm thinking about server farms.
102.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>Or at least recycle some of the heat fridge/freezers produce back into electricity This was already possible. Now you could just do it more efficiently.
103.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
No you can't make a perpetual motion machine with it ;)
104.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Well, in order to explain why you did a thing, you need to have some understanding of how the other party thinks in order to explain it in a way they will understand. And in order to explain it in that way, you would need to reflect upon th
105.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Doesn't this assume the AI internally models the problem in a way that isn't foreign to the human? I believe the most effective AI will definitely not model problems like a human.
106.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>you could capture a near-earth asteroid and just tunnel your space station into it, using the material inside the asteroid for construction material This is a cool idea. Maybe you could get the whole thing spinning and have really effic
107.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Being intelligent does not mean your brain is healthy. See Terry Davis for a tragic counterexample.
108.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
We're off on a tangent now, but you don't need religion to believe a victimless act to be immoral. All I was getting at is laws are not made strictly on moral grounds (rightfully so) and perhaps that's what "legislating
109.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Not so. There are considerations of tangible consequences for some unconsenting third party. That's the difference. Outlawing something "because it's wrong" is different than outlawing something because it wrongs someone
110.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
My guess is "legislating morality" refers to pushing legislation based solely on moral concerns. There are other reasons to outlaw murder than just morality.
111.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
If by computer, you mean a binary computer using transistors, there's no reason to think you can make it do anything a brain can do. Alternatively, if computer means any hypothetical hardware, it may very well end up looking like a bra
112.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
Easy brain hack. Name your thing what you want people to think it does.
113.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
>But instead of using a different search engine such as duckduckgo.com, we're calling for the government to break up Google? Without saying whether or not I think they should be "broken up", there's much more to consi
114.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
From a social perspective, allowing an issue to breathe can act as an inoculation against groups who might harbor extreme interpretations. Alternatively, sidelining the issue is likely to offer these groups time and space to fester in their
115.
by 0xBA5ED 7y ago
On an intuitive level, this actually seems like a more promising approach than "from scratch" learning systems if we want our AIs to "understand us".
116.
by 0xBA5ED 8y ago
This was my question too. These articles never seem to mention how they know the formations were caused by water specifically.
117.
by 0xBA5ED 8y ago
It is garbage. It's an arrogant mental shortcut that has little predictive value and encourages a dismissive attitude towards people in general. The fact that people are better and worse at certain things is beside the point. If you&#x
118.
by 0xBA5ED 8y ago
All this ABC crap is a distraction from considering the breadth of a candidate's strengths and weaknesses from a multifaceted perspective, as well as how they might compliment the team. I'm disappointed in you guys for humoring th
119.
by 0xBA5ED 8y ago
Loopholes are essentially bugs, and they're common. Is there a reason to believe another way of encoding laws would necessarily be more bug-prone than it currently is?
120.
by 0xBA5ED 8y ago
Ah, very cool. Sadly, it's Europe only and I live in the US. Looking at related links, it seems all the best options are Europe only.

More ›