17 ms·
Atlantic.net launches $0.99 SSD-based VPS servers
- mappu 12y agoThere are lots of providers at or around this price point (check out lowendbox or http://www.lowendstock.com/ http://www.lowendstock.com/). It's generally accepted they're oversold, but that doesn't make them any less of a good deal. For instance crissic.net (happy customer) offer 256MB ram and either 20GB SSD or 50GB spinning-rust for 15USD/year. The only news here is that Linode and DO don't think they can be profitable at these price points (and it's probably not possible when using Xen/KVM that can't easily be overprovisioned).
- themodelplumber 12y agoCouldn't find any uptime records kept by a third party, and their uptime SLAs don't seem to have much to do with uptime guarantees (as opposed to 'we will bring you back up in 30 minutes, etc.). https://www.atlantic.net/support/cloud-service-level-guarantee/ https://www.atlantic.net/support/cloud-service-level-guarant... As a business owner, I wouldn't bet anything on that. For personal development stuff though maybe it's great.
- jewel 12y agoSomething is wrong with their pricing, since a server with twice the RAM, bandwidth, and disk is $5/mo. It's too bad you can't combine two or more of these $1 servers in order to get just the right amount of VPS. This low price makes me wish that RAM and CPU could be added to cloud servers on an as-needed basis, i.e. hot-swappable RAM. That would be much more useful than autoscaling since it could react to traffic very quickly. You'd need live-migration behind the scenes to make it work, of course.
- albertoleal 12y agoFelt the same way. I'm wondering what the catch is.
- akie 12y agoLock-in, that's what the catch is. It's supposed to act as a gateway to more expensive plans.
- dspillett 12y agoYou often see plans like this on LEB, the catch is usually very oversold on CPU and memory resources, more so then more expensive plans. This might be less apparent with a bigger name provider who can swallow a bit more on there loss-leader plans so YMMV here. Of course to many light uses that overselling isn't going to matter particularly particularly when SSD backed as that reduces the effect of rampant I/O contention. In fact for things that need a small burst of CPU umpf every now and then, an oversold VM on a beefy host will outperform a cheap dedicated box (with an atom chip for instance) costing much more per month.
- pervycreeper 12y agoI would imagine that they are betting that most users will use this to host small static sites with negligible traffic, allowing them to benefit from payed for, but unused resources.
- Someone1234 12y agoIf that's the case then people could just use Amazon's S3. You can get a LOT of static site for 10c/month. More likely scenario is a tiny PHP site with the database hosted elsewhere?
- Karunamon 12y agoS3's the storage - you still have to run an httpd daemon somewhere, and even the smallest, cheapest EC2 instance will run you no less than $14 a month. (Notwithstanding the one-year-only free tier) (Wow, I didn't know you could just serve content straight off the storage. I need to re-examine AWS.. thanks :D)
- derefr 12y agoHeroku? I'm unsure what could fit into one of these VPSes but not a free-tier Heroku instance. (Which you get as many of as you like, mind you.)
- pivo 12y agoLooks like you can host a static web site just using S3: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/WebsiteHosting.html http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/WebsiteHostin...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- thinkmassive 12y agoYou can host static sites entirely on S3: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/WebsiteHosting.html http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/WebsiteHostin...
- aroch 12y agoSo will I get a nastygram if I buy 10 of these and push the whole 1TB every month? Edit: So their AUP[1] is full of a lot of crappy policies. Not allowed to use all the RAM you're assigned. Not supposed to use all the bandwidth you're assigned. Not supposed to use all the CPU you're assigned. No crons or background services -- what the fuck? No IRC, TOR, or p2p activity. They have an obscenity/morality clause. Cannot do any webdev that uses custom headers -- would even suggest that running wget or curl with a --user-agent flag is in violation. Edit2: And they require a valid address and phone number to even register. Screw off. Please note that in order to protect the integrity of our cloud, Atlantic.Net verifies phone and other contact information prior to account activation. Please be certain to provide a working phone number where you can be reached in order to avoid delays in the account creation process. No thank you. [1]: https://www.atlantic.net/support/acceptable-use-policy/ https://www.atlantic.net/support/acceptable-use-policy/
- d23 12y agoI suppose there's always a catch, but no background services? Talk about useless...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- zeroDivisible 12y agoI understand that with that price for providing a server, they need to do some user validation - thus the requirement for address and phone. But that issue with background services or cron - for that price, that's exactly why I'd consider their service. May I know what might be the reason why they don't allow this?
- aroch 12y ago> they need to do some user validation Nonsense. There are plenty of cheap hosts that don't do that sort of validation. >May I know what might be the reason why they don't allow this? Either they copypasta'd a boilerplate AUP -- in which case they're inept. Or they don't know how to properly virtualize and manage those provisions -- in which case they're also inept.
- SwellJoe 12y agoThere's a lot of ways to make a VPS suck, by not spending money where it's needed. An under-powered disk subsystem is probably going to contribute to these sucking (as Digital Ocean sucked in the beginning; not sure if they've fixed their disk bandwidth problems). But, assuming they aren't horribly under-powered on any of the vectors that affect performance, this is a great deal. 256MB is just enough to run a reasonable web server on, even with a database-backed application. Two more servers for DNS, and one for SMTP, and you'd have a solid setup for a large variety of tasks for under 5 bucks, and you'd control all of your services and all of your data. You couldn't run a big community site with lots of users, but you could definitely run a blog (for potentially hundreds of thousands of visitors, depending on how you setup that blog) or simple site.
- kevinchen 12y agoSequential write on my $5/month DigitalOcean instance in NYC2 region: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=~/test.bin bs=1M count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 3.84267 s, 273 MB/s It used to be about 80 MB/s last year, so it's gotten a lot better since.
- hackerboos 12y agoAtlantic.Net 256mb VPS root@hackerboosblog:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=~/test.bin bs=1M count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 3.11193 s, 337 MB/s
- SwellJoe 12y agoAnd, for comparison, the latest server I installed in our colo on the host system (with Corsair M500 SSDs): [root@srv3 joe]# dd if=/dev/zero of=~/test.bin bs=1M count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.310283 s, 3.4 GB/s And, from within a VM on the same machine (running KVM with an LVM volume): [root@joe2 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=~/test.bin bs=1M count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.967834 s, 1.1 GB/s So, Atlantic.net isn't too bad, I guess. My newest system isn't very heavily loaded yet; only has three VMs and a couple dozen websites on it.
- petercooper 12y agoWhat boggles my mind about cheap hosts is how the IP addresses still seem to keep flowing. I thought we were close to exhausting them, and it's certainly tricky to get extra IPs on some hosts, yet you can pay relatively small sums to spin up VPSes all over the place, each with their own IP :-)
- eli 12y agoIs it actually hard to get extra IPs anywhere? Sometimes I've had to fill out a form or pay a $1/mo but I've never been declined. (I suppose I also always have a good reason.)
- aroch 12y agoIf you fill out a LIR application for ARIN or RIPE you're probably going to get repurposed AFRINIC or APNIC IPv4 IPs (anywhere from 20 /25's to a /22 to a /16 ). Globally Ipv4 is pretty much exhausted (no large blocks) but some regions have more and there's a black/grey market for IPs that all the large hosts are part of.
- staunch 12y agoHas anyone written about this extensively?
- aroch 12y agoOn what, the IP blackmarket? I don't think so, but off the top of my head Microsoft (rather publicly) bought an entire /13 for several million a few years ago
- staunch 12y agoCurious about the on-going IPv4 war in general I guess. Seems like there aren't many who have a good view of the situation though.
- Gormo 12y agoI think you're right. I set up a VPS last year with a provider based in Buffalo, NY, but for a few weeks, geolocators kept placing my IP in Indonesia. But there doesn't really seem to be anything untoward about moving IPs from areas of low demand to areas of high demand.
- discardorama 12y agoNot to threadjack, but: what's a good alternative for the occasional high-ram, high-CPU-usage compute-intensive task? Say I wanted a machine to run some MCMC simulations, and needed 32GB RAM and a fast i7-class CPU. Where would I find one?
- aroch 12y agoHetzner if you plan on using it fairly regularly: https://robot.your-server.de/order/market https://robot.your-server.de/order/market Rackspace Cloud for relatively cheap compute once in a blue moon
- colechristensen 12y agoAWS. (obviously) For an instance you run only rarely the somewhat higher cost of EC2 instances compared to other providers should be fairly irrelevant. You'll find options from about 30 to 80 cents an hour.
- acc00 12y agoDepends on the value of "occasional", but did you try asking your friends? I've seen that being done around here, since the hardware you're describing really is pretty close to a beefy desktop/home server which usually spend their lives idly spinning their fans.
- drl42 12y agoAWS spot instances
- joshz 12y agoAWS or www.dominoup.com if it's with Python, R, Matlab or julia
- gsteinb88 12y agoI've had some great interactions with the team at (but haven't had the need to use yet for anything intensive) rescale.com
- henpa 12y agohttp://ovh.com/us http://ovh.com/us is the best I found!
- kolanos 12y agoI'm not a fan of these pricing models for VPSs. If you're fine with an oversubscribed OpenVZ VPS with minimal RAM/HDD then you might as well be on a shared virtual host. Even with an oversubscribed OpenVZ infrastructure, I can't imagine Atlantic.net makes a profit at this price point.I shudder to think where they're cutting corners. I can only assume the strategy is to get them (the customers) in the door at $0.99/mo. and hope they'll upgrade when they quickly outgrow their bare minimum VPS specs. But if I'm in that position, am I really going to stay with a OpenVZ provider instead of moving on to a KVM/Xen one where I know I'm getting what I paid for?
- derefr 12y agoAre these OpenVZ? That's a shame. Really, all I've ever wanted is an IaaS provider that gives me VMs in the shape of Heroku's instance partitions: a little bit of guaranteed CPU/memory/IOPS per dollar, with cheap/free low-jitter bandwidth thrown in, made specifically for allowing network-server applications that scale horizontally. My 64MB-of-memory IO-bound Erlang chat server doesn't need a 4GB instance with eight cores. But it has to take that instance, because that's what you pay for in order to get a good uplink.
- mikeash 12y agoNow that you mention it, it seems odd that companies don't let you tweak specs individually. RAM, CPU, disk space, network speed, etc. are all independent variables. Why not have some pricing formula and then give us a slider for each dimension and let us choose what we want?
- Wilya 12y agoI suppose that's because in they end, they want to allocate all the RAM, CPU, and network link available on each physical host. If a host has a 1Gb uplink, 32 cores and 256GB of RAM, and someone takes 1Gb bandwidth, 1 cores and 1GB of RAM, all the other cores can't be sold any more. It's easier for them to just split each host server in n VMs than to do some fancy stuff to try to maximize allocation. That being said, some providers let you tweak everything independently. I know Gandi does [1], there are probably others. (I don't use them, no idea what their cloud service is worth, I'm just showing the sliders) [1] https://www.gandi.net/hosting/iaas/buy https://www.gandi.net/hosting/iaas/buy
- corford 12y agoLove the price. Shame they haven't got an EU presence :(
- mp99e99 12y agoIts coming :)
- corford 12y agoAwesome!
- papaf 12y agoWorth considering if you are in the EU: https://www.ultravps.eu/en/ https://www.ultravps.eu/en/ I found them when I was looking for a provider that had Linux Arch images.
- hackerboos 12y agoSATA storage...
- seldo 12y agoIt's a pretty interesting case study of interface design that because DO's website looks so much nicer, their servers feel like a good deal, while Atlantic.net's old-fashioned branding makes it just feel fly by night, even though I'm sure they're objectively pretty similar.
- mp99e99 12y agoThanks for the feedback. We have a new interface & website, but weren't able to get it up by launch time. I agree, DO's interface is prettier, as well as their website. They do a great job with the design over there.
- mp99e99 12y agoHi Everyone: Thanks for the thumbs up on this. Firstly, we are a 20-year old startup! Everyone laughed at us when we talked about doing the original Internet startup -- dialup Internet. Over time, we adapted and rode the booms and busts that went on in our industry, all the while staying cash flow positive and learning to GRIND. We are thinking there is going to be a explosion in startups globally, that will lead to the next big things, not just in the web but material sciences, biotech, etc. Our goal is to build out a global compute infrastructure and get it in the hands of tomorrows Einsteins.. wherever they are born. We want to see the future happen faster, and see more of it in our lifetimes. Thats not going to happen if we wait around for today's dominant players, who for whatever reason are moving extremely slow. Thats our over-reaching goal. You can read about it here: https://www.atlantic.net/blog/2014/09/30/atlantic-net-launches-99-server-go-plan-to-push-the-advancement-of-startup-innovation/ https://www.atlantic.net/blog/2014/09/30/atlantic-net-launch... Doing a startup is really, really hard. We're trying to make it less so. We're also ready to provide an alternative narrative to AWS conquering the world -- but we have to be aggressive and go FAST! So, bottom line is we're trying to do something new,take some risks,be bold, and take on the giants of the industry. AWS's margin is our opportunity :) Wish us luck! We're going for it!
- Karunamon 12y agoThis is great to hear, there's nothing ever wrong with more competition, but could you respond to the concerns in this thread with regards to your AUP? Your terms as currently written, are at the very least extremely limiting.
- salgernon 12y agoI signed up for a $.99 VPS some years ago; horrible service and downtime, so I wrote them to cancel. And wrote them and wrote them. And complained to their domain registrar, and stopped the auto-withdrawl of $.99 from paypal, and complained some more. To this day, I get a $.99 email bill with an invalid reply-to address, followed by a $.99 second notice bill. Every month... I'm sure there are people that have let their auto-pay accounts continue to feed whoever is at the back end of this. (vpstree.com)
- devicenull 12y agoSo, you're complaining about a completely unrelated company... for what reason?
- javajosh 12y agoYeah, for real - I'm sorry for your terrible experience, but surely it doesn't have much to do with atlantic.net...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- lprez 12y agoA real direct competitor in DO and Linode is Vultr.com My experience with them has been positive. They have slightly higher specs and a good variety of locations.
- pdq 12y agoI have used Vultr's $5/month service for at least the past 6 months. It has only restarted once unexpectedly, and the CPU performance is quite impressive for that price.
- Kudos 12y agoAnecdotal web hosting recommendations are worse than useless and everyone seems to have one regardless of how qualified they are to give it.
- notastartup 12y agowhat would you guys use a $0.99 server for?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- kijin 12y agoMonitoring, VPN, or maybe just a spare box to experiment with. If you're outside of the United States, VPN on a tiny server is by far the cheapest way to access US-only content.
- adnanh 12y agoRegistration is too complicated and cumbersome. I gave up when they couldn't call me on my phone and requested a copy of my passport, driver's licence or a bank bill... I'll just stick with DigitalOcean...
- yelnatz 12y agoI'm actually waiting for their call right now. That fact actually blindsided me since I already gave info and couldn't just login and start up the server. I wish I'd have read stuff carefully before blindlessy jumping into a deal.
- wcchandler 12y agoI waited about 10 minutes before hitting up their chat. They were able to finish the authentication process from there.
- jperks02 12y agoThanks, I did this too!
- powertower 12y ago> Atlantic.Net says it is targeting this service at early-stage and bootstrapped startups that want develop on a dependable cheap server. They are doing no such thing. At 99 cents per month, they are targeting people who want things for free, hoping that they can later up-sell, or convert them to a higher plan. Don't know how well this is going to work in the hosting industry - usually the lower the cost, the worse the customer is. I'd like to say maybe as someone on the 99 cent plan sees that they need more resources, they could click a button and get on the $9.99 plan, but that might be wishful thinking, and they are just opening themselves up to an enormous drain on resources. Either way, if there is any indication of people signing up for this, all the other hosting companies are going to match this plan within 24-48 hours, just like they did when everyone switched to "unlimited" offerings. It's a race to the bottom.
- mp99e99 12y agoWhile its true we would like you to buy a larger plan, in other countries even $5 USD can be barrier to entry for a speculative idea. Plus, what if you want to tinker, toy and learn? We're trying something new, give it a chance.
- petercooper 12y agoI'm not suggesting Atlantic are doing this, but back in the days when shared hosting was more popular and hosts more predatory, it was common to see hosts offer deals like paying $99 for a year of hosting, they'd give that straight to the affiliate who referred the sale, they'd put the prices up 2-3x in year two, and enough people would stick around to make it all pay off. Such a strategy could work even better with a VPS since it's harder to migrate away due to the more complex things people tend to do with them.
- cowpewter 12y agoIt's always surreal to me to see Atlantic.net in the news. I worked in their customer service department for over six years back when their primary product was still dialup internet. It was a pretty good job, for call center work. No scripts, no quotas - each MSR was trained and trusted to actually be able to solve customers' problems on their own. I don't know if that's the case anymore. By 2007, dialup was dead and the company had pivoted to making most of its money from hosting. I left a few months prior, but still had friends working in the call center when they were all laid off. I don't know if they outsource their phone-based customer service now or if they set up a new call center in Orlando instead of Gainesville, but if it's the former, it's a shame.
- mp99e99 12y agoHello Atlantic.net alumni! We're still grinding it out and trying to change the world from here! Keep hope alive!
- rubiquity 12y agoDidn't the 90s and early 2000s teach us all that "You get what you pay for" when it comes to hosting?
- wmf 12y agoOTOH, Moore's Law says that at some point you should be able to get a decent amount of hardware for $1/month. No support, of course.
- obilgic 12y agoI want a hosted docker service which charges me based on the MB ram used per min
- KnightHawk3 12y agoThey are probably going to charge by CPU / minute instead of ram. It's easy to make programs that run in 1mb of ram and use 100% cpu for example. Ram costs less to be full than CPU does.
- joshmn 12y agoWhile I'd give them a whirl on their lower tier, their pricing for their largest instance (16384 MB/4 vCPU/200 GB/7 TB, $160 for Linux) isn't that competitive. (non-affiliated plug) I've been using http://RunAbove.com http://RunAbove.com for something this large, and it's an absolute steal. They're backed by OVH. Versus a similarly-specced DigitalOcean node for $240 (2.5x RunAbove the cost), we were seeing a performance increase of 35% on our high-volume API. And that's on non-tuned Postgres/Rails4/Redis Docker containers.
- srcmap 12y agoFor this price/ram/cpu needs, does it make more sense to do colo your own server? I see colo 1U server normally ~100 per month.
- joshmn 12y agoIt would! However colocating requires money upfront to buy the hardware. It's a good long-term play but short-term you don't really see the benefits. There are other things to worry about too, such as remote hands, which we really don't want to deal with.
- aguki 12y agoLowEndSpirit offers SSD-based VPSes for €3 per year with a larger worldwide coverage. Downside is you only get a IPv6 address http://lowendspirit.com/locations.html http://lowendspirit.com/locations.html
- hackerboos 12y agoI find hosting providers that use WHMCS tend to disappear after a few months and at these prices you can almost guarantee it.
- debian3 12y agoWhen I try to signup and I see that their "2GB RAM" plan @ $19.94 is their "Most Popular"...
- nacs 12y agoMost websites that have a "Most Popular" tag on a plan are almost always lying I've noticed. In reality, its just the plan the company wants you to get and has no reflection on actual sales volume.
- lsc 12y agoI find it interesting how the trend is moving towards charging less per unit resource on the low-end plans; digital ocean gives you more disk per dollar on the small plan, while these people give you dramatically better ram per dollar on the low-end plans. The interesting part (and why the pricing scheme that I chose moves in the opposite direction, e.g. you get more resources per dollar as you buy more) - is that while the cost of hardware is pretty linear, there is certainly a support and abuse cost associated with every account, so the lower-end accounts cost the provider more per unit ram to provide.
- sloop 12y agoI think what we're seeing is both: 1) more cut-throat competition to have the lowest advertised price (the ads just display the minimum available price, not the price of a service that actually meets a customer's need) AND 2) once you get a customer on your platform, they are likely to upgrade and/or add more services which will be at the higher price points.
- lsc 12y agoyeah, I would assume that 1. would push the price down in general. The trend to discount the smallest plans has got to be mostly 2. It's an interesting strategy; if it works, it would imply that there is more sensitivity to price at the bottom of the market than there is at the top of the market.
- visarga 12y agoThey also give you an IP address if I am not wrong, included in the same $0.99/month. Any other host would charge that just for the IP alone.
- lsc 12y agoWhile that is about market rate for a single IP, an IP address doesn't actually cost the ISP much at all. https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html#isps https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html#isps also, at least until ARIN runs out, it's in your interest to qualify for as many IP addresses as you can, and VPSs are one way to legitimately "show efficient use" of your current IP addresses.
- jperks02 12y agoI just signed up and was able to have my account validated through the chat - so far it seems pretty great!
- visarga 12y agoAt the very least, it's a possible cheap VPN/cloud storage server. Is there an open source stack that would replace Google's solution to mail/calendar/cloud file storage and sync?
- icebraining 12y agohttps://owncloud.org/ https://owncloud.org/
- Sami_Lehtinen 12y agoNo European data centre option(s) available. ;(
- bcx 12y agoIt's hard to be a web hosting company, and atlantic.net has been in the business since 1995. I am impressed that they are fighting to stay relevant, even if it is a race to the bottom. The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and Registrars. Domain Name: ATLANTIC.NET Registry Domain ID: 1092612_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com http://tucowsdomains.com Updated Date: 2014-09-16 11:43:09 Creation Date: 1995-05-17 04:00:00
- mp99e99 12y agoThanks, its not easy!
- ForFreedom 12y agoOut of curiosity, what can you runon 256MB ram?
- Nux 12y agoQuite a lot of stuff. A small dns server, email server, web server etc.
- ForFreedom 12y agoBut the load factor? To run a http + db server?
- Nux 12y agoUse a static site with nginx/thttpd/lighttpd, it will fly. Obviously there's a limit with what you can do with those resources.
- growt 12y agoSSD performance data: dd bs=1M count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.7785 s, 386 MB/s hdparm -tT /dev/disk/by-uuid/50543a27-2cb6-4d68-9ab4-e09493f946d5 /dev/disk/by-uuid/50543a27-2cb6-4d68-9ab4-e09493f946d5: Timing cached reads: 14362 MB in 2.00 seconds = 7189.28 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 1770 MB in 3.00 seconds = 589.21 MB/sec really nice.
- sauere 12y agoReading the comments here really is funny. If you do not like their ToS, you are free to go somewhere else. Your money, your vote. Personally i find their policy very understandable. Obviously you won't be able to host a TOR node on this thing or push tons of traffic over it. That's obviously not what it was made for. This $1 deal is perfect for hosting simple, static sites or just playing around with the OS. But some people will complain about anything.
- runeks 12y agoI agree completely. The only way to go below $1/mo is by using over-subscription. You don't get dedicated hardware for $1/mo. With over-subscription, it's a mathematical fact that you cannot use all the processing power you've seemingly been given. The VPS provider could just give you only as much CPU power as you can use at any time (effectively 1/n the total power with n users) -- but that would be terribly inefficient (most of the CPU power would be unused at any given time). This isn't for everyone, of course, but I don't see a reason to criticize this business model when it delivers a definite advantage: lower prices. If you don't like the trade-off of a lower price at the cost of not being able to use as much CPU power or RAM as you like, you may choose a service with less or no over-subscription. But I don't see how that subtracts from what this service has to offer.
- x1798DE 12y agoI feel like none of the people commenting on the ToS did buy the services. They were warning people who might not have read them that you're not necessarily getting what you'd expect. It's a perfectly reasonable comment to make.
- tomjen3 12y agoIt is quite reasonable to voice your disagreement with their policies _and_ take your money somewhere else. Besides with that TOS it should have been part of the headline.
- imdsm 12y agoSo I just wasted a lot of time to find out they only accept credit cards? Not debit cards, not PayPal, nor anything else? Wasted my time. GFY Atlantic.net
- GrinningFool 12y agoIf I had caught the limit of just one per customer, I wouldn't have gone to the trouble of signing up. This would be useful to me, but I had plans that required 4-5 instances, and no desire for the more expensive offerings. ramnode has a roughly equivalent offering for $2/mo (8/q)
- mp99e99 12y agoWe are limiting these to try to have enough capacity so everyone can get one. Its new!
- lsv1 12y agoI just bought 2 and will be trying them out over the next bit. I think these boxes will be amazing to host my client static sites and basic CMS back-ends. At $1 a month I'd like to buy 20~ in the near future.
- jshsmn 12y agoRevised AUP is up: https://www.atlantic.net/support/acceptable-use-policy/ https://www.atlantic.net/support/acceptable-use-policy/
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- diwu1989 12y agoThe CPU performance is pretty good for a single core. http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/932814 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/932814