3 ms·
This should be shown in court, first, to avoid predictable blowback around making a weak-appeal. I feel like OpenAI is attempting to obscure the public sentime
by ncr100 3mo ago
This should be shown in court, first, to avoid predictable blowback around making a weak-appeal.
I feel like OpenAI is attempting to obscure the public sentiment trend. And that are willing to taint a jury pool by releasing evidence.
I assume then, that OpenAI is "feeling" or has determined it is perceived negatively by the public, in general. They may be seeking to influence their talent pipeline, to reduce inbound constraint they predict are coming from a lack of perceived trustworthiness of OpenAI.
Seems inappropriate for OpenAI to post this public-appeal, to me.
- bpodgursky 3mo agoTech company drama is followed by .1% of the population. The jury pool is not going to be tainted. This has no impact on the public and nobody expects it to.
- ofjcihen 3mo agoIt’s the insinuation of racism regarding the “mixing up Asian last names” bit that’s really got me feeling like their response is the public appeal move.
- ncr100 2mo agoYikes, yes that's a great point. Implicit racism in OpenAI's messaging.
- freejazz 3mo ago> This should be shown in court "Weak security" isn't a defense to theft, so probably wont. >Seems inappropriate for OpenAI to post this public-appeal, to me. They are desperate and are behaving desperately. Who actually qualifies anything they say anymore anyway? I certainly don't