ncr100

4 ms·

1.
by ncr100 5d ago
"Be excellent to each other" is great. In my view this first real AI age will plant the seed of us recognizing humans need to treat each other as precious. The law kinda does that leaving systemic bias and archaic power structures
2.
by ncr100 7d ago
They were super peaceful per a reasonable judgement. Unreasonably people were digesting meat from innocent animals, slaughtered previously, which was violent. And their shoes... They trodded upon insects, and plants. Violence! Again, unreas
3.
by ncr100 7d ago
Not just 'spray paint' or tag... I will power wash it off ... I do regularly already .. But if it's protest, or better yet recognizably art, then maybe yes!
4.
by ncr100 7d ago
Some of they do, others don't.
5.
by ncr100 7d ago
Ugh. It could be worse, in the elevator, but bad is also bad. Surveillance in the elevator may be legal depending on the locality and set-up.
6.
by ncr100 7d ago
Than You! Been looking for this. Cheers
7.
by ncr100 7d ago
So, since Gemini was told in May it was a hacking agent and then did this, then the AI Guardrail could be don't cause harm to humans in any derivable manner of your behavior. Otherwise, I will expect for the under-development Gemini AI
8.
by ncr100 8d ago
Or Grove
9.
by ncr100 8d ago
Email them...?
10.
by ncr100 10d ago
And the island of Guam is not clickable / visible in landscape mode on the phone.
11.
by ncr100 10d ago
Is like Microsoft Windows in that way?
12.
by ncr100 11d ago
Claude Sonnet 5 'High', first attempt, is functional and quite basic: - https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/4598e48b-8b19-473a-88c4-9...
13.
by ncr100 11d ago
"Artisanal" english.
14.
by ncr100 11d ago
I can't even ^ Intentional.
15.
by ncr100 11d ago
Cool. Now that we are living in The Future, I am dumbfounded how e.g. dynamically populated lists change their content reliably to something I did not want, during the phase of interaction where my finger is descending onto the target. Clic
16.
by ncr100 11d ago
This seems like a general UI bug. Q: For those amongst us who are UI experts, what is it called when dynamic lists populate unpredictably while a finger-tap is in-progress? a) start query and see initial results b) start finger-navigation,
17.
by ncr100 15d ago
EULA perhaps, or do you think not?
18.
by ncr100 15d ago
He does, it's in his bio in LinkedIn
19.
by ncr100 16d ago
Mmm I have had two foldables .. 3 years daily usage ... and they're great phones and great tablets. So, ymmv.
20.
by ncr100 16d ago
Lease for $58/mo .. $1392 over lease life
21.
by ncr100 17d ago
https://archive.is/7UHoa
22.
by ncr100 17d ago
Means the authors of the paper are "authors".
23.
by ncr100 17d ago
To build on this, is it correct to say ANY training on data from any individual originating human deserves to be cited and attributed on the solut6paper? I wonder whether these bickering users (of AI various products) with math degrees are
24.
by ncr100 17d ago
Is it that they / mathematicians didn't solve it? But rather that WE ALL WHO WERE SPIDERED FOR THE MODELS SOLVED IT is the true attribution?
25.
by ncr100 17d ago
Graffiti is amazing. It is protest.
26.
by ncr100 22d ago
Here is the EULA: https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/terms-of-service/ After reviewing it - idk? It's too complex for me to understand .. in my naivety!
27.
by ncr100 22d ago
Agreed - and with AI being able to easily navigate arbitrarily complex and humanly-misleading systems, average humans (without a personal lawyer always on retainer) are at an increasing disadvantage in society.
28.
by ncr100 22d ago
Additionally e.g. the UK has right-to-repair which may influence this subject: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552588 (from elsewhere in this discussion).
29.
by ncr100 22d ago
I disagree that it's "inherently deceptive". That claim deserve justification IMO. It's an obtuse-feeling abstraction. > ".. or whatever they want to call this fake purchasing shit that all software has .."
30.
by ncr100 22d ago
I get it. And the point I failed to make is they did redefine it via a normal process of contract. A bit of pedantry: > Sony is the one with the different definition Yes, agreed. And to build on that, Sony is using a normal legal vehicle

More ›