5 ms·
But… why? Climate change is very much real and even stubborn deep-right voters like my father now ‘believe’ in it. Ok, some people make some cash. But wouldn’t
by port11 5mo ago
But… why? Climate change is very much real and even stubborn deep-right voters like my father now ‘believe’ in it. Ok, some people make some cash. But wouldn’t they anyway? I don’t understand this need to keep pandering to a minority and to destroy ecosystems.
- dozerly 5mo agoWhich part of trump making billions of dollars from oil oligarchs is the confusing bit? His incentive structure is clear.
- kakacik 5mo ago[dead]
- kelnos 5mo agoMany deep-right voters do not believe in climate change. They're a big part of Trump's base.
- conartist6 5mo agoYou don't need a chart these days. I live in Boulder Colorado, and I can't imagine that we'll have more than 10 more ski seasons.
- cmxch 5mo agoUpside - Aspen loses it’s arrogant environmentalists and it starts mining silver again.
- estearum 5mo agoWow yeah such a great upside! Eradicating species, destroying economies, and eliminating entire ways to enjoy nature's bounty here on earth –– a small price to pay to hurr hur hurrr... own the libs ;) The DSM needs to be updated soon for this type of sociopathic cynicism. It can't be kept with the rest of society.
- qingcharles 5mo agoThe government knows it's real, these are generally well-educated people who went to decent schools. But, I would challenge that most right-wing voters know whether it is real. Where I live in rural America the vast majority are pro-fossil fuel, anti-EV. EVs are seen as "gay" or "feminine" by the folks out here. So the choice to use fossil fuels might just be some performative machismo, allowing their pick-ups to output black smoke, make a loud noise and look "tough." Those are the majority of the Republican voters at this stage. To make them happy you do things like spend millions to tear up infrastructure which challenges their worldview. This should result in increased votes for the current administration at the mid-terms. So even if climate change is a real and current threat, you need to say it isn't to get re-elected.
- taffydavid 5mo agoI don't believe they do any of this for votes. I think somebody within the administration has a personal grudge against science, especially anything related to climate change.
- RetroTechie 5mo agoThose 2 motives are not mutually exclusive! Both may apply at the same time.
- roenxi 5mo ago> So the choice to use fossil fuels might just be some performative machismo, allowing their pick-ups to output black smoke, make a loud noise and look "tough." Might be linked to petrol cars being cheaper to buy for the same amount of car? That seems like an easier explanation. There is a masculine element in that men want to be seen to own big things to show off, but I doubt it has anything to do with liking black smoke. If they wanted loud noises they'd go a motorbike or get an obnoxious horn.
- georgemcbay 5mo agoLook up the phrase "rolling coal". These people do exist, unfortunately.
- ciconia 5mo agoReactionary politics, greed, stupidity. Pick any three.
- AdamN 5mo agoIt's the very definition of a culture war and in addition sadly evidence of limited intelligence. Even the most red blooded oil man wouldn't do this because this data is also useful for petroleum drilling and logistics - it's a whole other kind of person driving this.
- mxkopy 5mo agoIt all makes sense when you realize QAnon basically runs the white house now. There’s a very insulated type of American who lives in their own world, that unfortunately lots of voters are apparently sympathetic to. It’s probably seen as a victory against the climate change hoax or something along those lines.
- expedition32 5mo agoThat's how the Chinese empire collapsed. They had scientists and explorers until one day the emperor decided that knowledge upsets harmony.
- Ajakks 5mo agoYou don't know anything about China.
- te_234304958686 5mo agoI have seen some chatter where 2nd-term Trumpism has been (very imperfectly) compared to Mao's Cultural Revolution. Obviously there are many differences, no question. But it's actions like this where a bit of the comparison seems apt -- fervent, nonsensical anti-intellectualism / anti-science actions done purely in the name of ideology. Why else would one actually go out of the way to dismantle a working ocean observation system, which provides a rich amount of data for multiple purposes? The only action that seems to make sense is that: A) Some of that data can be used to observe climate change issues. B) In Trumpism, it is not enough anymore to propagandize that climate change is not happening. One must also actively suppress anything that could suggest climate change is happening, no matter how much the cost, no matter how much it hurts other non-related things.
- enoint 5mo agoIt’s seen in Crusader terms. A bunch of things which are not Christian, for example controlling social order at all costs, are adornments on nationalism. The apocalyptic parts of QAnon slot into their belief system. So many other religious movements rely on salvation. Another commenter mentioned ancient China. Big political upheavals swept ancient China based on very slight new ideas about salvation.
- fennecbutt 5mo agoTribalism.
- tremon 5mo agoScience is antithetical to rule-by-decree or other forms of despotism, since it strives to disprove any and all claims. The powers that be simply don't like to be told "you're wrong", and that is the core of what science does. It's as simple as that.
- conartist6 5mo agohttps://xkcd.com/3226/ https://xkcd.com/3226/
- estearum 5mo agoBecause we have actual retards in office. People keep looking for a deeper explanation. There isn't one. They are actual stupid people. They do stupid things.
- gacgacgac 5mo agoI'd encourage you to express this sentiment without the slur. Disability advocates have been pressing hard to reduce its usage.
- chimprich 5mo agoI don't think Trump or any of his appointed lieutenants think any of this through. It's the result of decisions made by emotion, not logic. "Vibe-governing" in other words. Climate change, and science in general, is associated with nerds, boring reality, obstacles to immediate gratification, and effects on poor people. Fossil fuels are associated with large wads of cash, action films, and sticking it to the libs. Decisions might have terrible consequences. Who cares? Thinking things through is boring, and the people making the decisions are rich enough to be insulated from anything that might happen and old enough to not be around when it does.
- port11 5mo agoI doubt that people in government, along the entire chain of command, that get paid to analyse policy, that pay consultants to analyse policy, that produce reports on the many facets of the world… that all of that is put together to NOT think things through. I’d honestly prefer the explanation to be that they’re just that evil, at least that aligns with my worldview.
- triceratops 5mo ago> even stubborn deep-right voters like my father now ‘believe’ in it I don't believe that, sorry. I mean I believe you that your father says so. But I don't think that holds for most right voters.
- port11 5mo agoHe sees the consequences, he’s a hobby farmer. He watches the news talk about how weather patterns got aggressive and disruptive, how crops now fail, etc. He fixes the roofs destroyed by giant hail. He gets it. Now, you’re right in some ways. He doesn’t care for the science or the electric cars and so on; but after a lifetime of exposure to the situation, it’s hard to keep dismissing it. He grew up in a very different country, weather-wise, and made the connection between climate change and why his potato harvest failed. I believe, without proof, that most people understand that the world’s climate is changing and creating Big Problems. They might not admit it or understand the science, but can see the consequences. And no, they don’t agree with how to solve this.
- UncleMeat 5mo agoThe entire motivation of Trump and the MAGA movement is "fuck you, libs." The left likes green energy and scientific research performed on the environment so the right hates that stuff even if their actions also hurt themselves.
- BobaFloutist 5mo agoPeople are going to give you all sorts of answers that are based on strategy or negotiation or interests, but I think it basically all boils down to "to own the libs." We have to remember that before this all started, he was registered as a Democrat. He doesn't (or didn't) give a shit about any of this, but people that said no to him do, so he's going to do his level best to break it all. It's just spite, and glee at being able to make people bewildered, angry, and sad. That's all so much of this is.
- ElevenLathe 5mo agoYour father believes it because, presumably, he is not paid to deny it, like the president and his lackeys are.
- lopsotronic 5mo agoIt's the deep desire for a sort of restorative authoritarianism: someone who can reduce the complex state of the world into "the way it should be". The resentment is not versus fate or calamity but against those people who study and give voice to complexity. If someone can just shut those people up and make them go away, we will be restored to a simpler and more moral world. Where tragedy can rightly live in the realms of Gods and Mystery. I would gently remind those that prefer such simplicity that not all nations do. We are not alone in the world. The nation that better understands the complexities of the natural world will, all else being equal, utterly trounce the nation that persists in fictionalizing existence. Unless you want to re-write your national anthem in Mandarin, you will someday need to (re-?)grapple with the complexities of the universe.
- easyThrowaway 5mo agoBecause once shit hits the fan, those responsible for destroying the ecosystem will take a one-way flight for a fully air-conditioned bunkerized apartment lot in Dubai with any Epstein island-level luxury you can think of and fuck the consequences for everyone else, that's why.