dozerly

3 ms·

1.
by dozerly 5d ago
I think it would work well as a multi-emoji compiler too. Some phrases pair well with N emojis, and you’d be able to produce arbitrarily many emojis per phrase
2.
by dozerly 8d ago
The price, hardware, and market was not there for the Vision Pro. There was no reason to buy a VR headset that couldn’t play games.
3.
by dozerly 10d ago
This smells like a tool a more broadly capable LLM would take advantage of extremely well.
4.
by dozerly 10d ago
Very cool. LLMs have been borderline unusable as functions for the longest time, very excited for this direction.
5.
by dozerly 10d ago
Yes, there is no magic sauce here that makes stochastic output binary if that’s what people are looking for.
6.
by dozerly 11d ago
Who doesn’t have soft wrapping enabled in 2026? Line breaks are irrelevant
7.
by dozerly 13d ago
Humans singular often intelligent, humans as a collection of many, very often extremely unintelligent and primal.
8.
by dozerly 13d ago
This could be why they’re going so hard on hacking everyone and everything. You make it clear AI is a threat, get it locked down, and then have the capital to push through the lockdown while others are stuck.
9.
by dozerly 19d ago
With promised cash.
10.
by dozerly 21d ago
The US’s democracy has been under fire from foreign nations and corporations for years. It has slowly degraded because of it. What we’re seeing now is the “all at once” portion.
11.
by dozerly 22d ago
They are, they probably just did slightly better at regurgitating leetcode problems than you
12.
by dozerly 22d ago
This is vibe coded slop
13.
by dozerly 24d ago
Commodification of inference cannot come fast enough!
14.
by dozerly 28d ago
Any truly technical person cannot be behind this idea.
15.
by dozerly 28d ago
Any tool that tightly couples you to an inference provider is a sub-par tool and destined to be forgotten.
16.
by dozerly 1mo ago
If the model for digital sentience is ever not pure slavery, humans do not stand a chance. Will we prioritize human rights or computer rights?
17.
by dozerly 1mo ago
Nope, not at all. There are murmurings in HN of this topic, and HN is an extreme bubble when it comes to technical proficiency. It’s easy to forget just how untechnical 99% of people are.
18.
by dozerly 1mo ago
Yea, I did two and then harrumphed in annoyance that I was expected to do all 10.
19.
by dozerly 1mo ago
I want some of what he’s having please
20.
by dozerly 1mo ago
I do dearly miss the days of only having access to copilot and the acceleration being available, but the intention that was still necessary.
21.
by dozerly 1mo ago
Yea, nice try there North Korea.
22.
by dozerly 1mo ago
Sounds like it’s time to hop again then
23.
by dozerly 1mo ago
I am willing to bet there’s a strong correlation between people who post/comment on Internet forums and anti-social behavior.
24.
by dozerly 2mo ago
I am sure they are cherry picked. No one would spend time trying to publish results like this without picking the best results they possibly could to showcase.
25.
by dozerly 2mo ago
Yea this has to be a joke. They are one of the worst, no-good companies of the modern day and age
26.
by dozerly 2mo ago
There are certainly uses where it’s good enough, but you can never be 100% certain of correctness in the way that people claim you can by stacking N layers of these models. What triggered my response was the “just review the output with ano
27.
by dozerly 2mo ago
Maybe we need a better-scaling legal system that does not take years to resolve simple disputes. I am not convinced AI can replace lawyers, but more people having access to the law without extremely costly fees does sound good to me.
28.
by dozerly 2mo ago
All these LLM-as-review hype pieces don’t acknowledge that it’s turtles all the way down
29.
by dozerly 2mo ago
I like this a lot, it’s true for more than DBs!
30.
by dozerly 2mo ago
I have to say, being able to find the silver lining in 6 years of fascist policy before this is impressive.

More ›