16 ms·
Molotov cocktail is hurled at home of Sam Altman
https://archive.ph/aoXIY https://archive.ph/aoXIY
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czx91rdxpyeo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czx91rdxpyeo
https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/10/tech/suspect-arrest-openai-ceo-sam-altman https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/10/tech/suspect-arrest-openai-ce...
- linkage 6mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- smt88 6mo ago> face of AI amongst low-information luddites This is condescending and unfair. Altman, OpenAI, and the media have spent years making Altman the face of AI. His company has (by far) the largest market cap, does the most deals, and has the most users. I suspect Anthropic/Claude will become as much of a household name as ChatGPT, but it's not even close yet. ChatGPT is almost a generic term for AI chatbots at the moment.
- linkage 6mo ago[flagged]
- MiguelX413 6mo agoI think their point stands.
- smt88 6mo ago> You're conflating MAU with economic relevance. No, I'm not. Are you unable to make a point without being condescending and assuming the worst of people you disagree with? > The overwhelming majority of ChatGPT users are brokies on the free tier who use it for simple questions, like their homework assignments or relationship advice. Yes, I know. That's my whole point. The "best" or most advanced product in any tech category is really "the face" of that category. See also: cars, video game consoles, audio equipment, etc.
- 2dfs 6mo agoLol Scott and Jereome have no idea about the underlying tech. Its a nice hype storm for Anthropic.
- ziml77 6mo ago> brokies No fucking wonder they're throwing molotovs. How about not calling people less fortunate elitist, condescending names.
- PunchTornado 6mo agoAn impostor is an impostor, no matter what the media makes them. Tbh, it's ok that the plates brake into his head since he has done so many bad things previously, he deserves it.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- sourcegrift 6mo ago[flagged]
- whimblepop 6mo agoNeither statement is an incitement to violence. Charles Koch's support for an open borders policy is on the public record; there's no conspiracy nor assertion of conspiracy: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/the-case-for-open-borders https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/the-case...
- neko_ranger 6mo ago[flagged]
- josefritzishere 6mo agoMy first thought was false flag. Is that too cynical?
- foota 6mo agoI would go for out of touch, not cynical. A lot of people really think AI is the devil.
- polotics 6mo agoPossible, but unlikely. To organise such a stunt and keep undetected you're going to need other consigliere than what Sam's got I presume.
- josefritzishere 6mo agoLike another commenter wrote... anyone can cast a fireball. Sam has been called a sociopath by many who know him personally. So it seems more likely than it might be otherwise.
- ReptileMan 6mo agoNope. So was mine.
- stevenwoo 6mo agoIt kind of fits with the behavior he exhibited as reported by Farrow in New Yorker article.
- rvz 6mo agoThe problem here is that there are no viable solutions to what happens when AI eventually replaces (yes replaces) tens of millions of humans in white collar roles. All that is being "promised" are vague claims of "abundance". But all I see is this: "AGI" is going to bring abundance of lots of very angry people and UBI to no-one (because it can never work at a large sustainable scale). Some people are starting to realise that "AGI" was a grift and a scam and they are not happy about this lie and the insiders knew that and increased spending on security and private bodyguards.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- operatingthetan 6mo agoI don't think the LLM will produce AGI. Just based on how context windows work, the prompt cycle, etc. LLMs aren't out there thinking about stuff in their spare time. The way they appear to have thoughts and a psyche is purely an illusion.
- booleandilemma 6mo agoIt doesn't have to produce AGI and it could still ruin the lives of millions of people. Our society isn't ready for that kind of shock. We can't all be instagram influencers.
- ericd 6mo agoIt’s still pretty hard to get a contractor to show up and do a good job for less than a king’s ransom. Not that everyone can be a contractor, but there are lots of industries where there aren’t enough workers. We also need to rebuild our manufacturing supply chains, and there’s a huge amount to be done there.
- fooqux 6mo agoSomething I often think about is how we can barely define what AGI, consciousness, etc are. We may be pretty sure that what we have currently is an illusion, but at which point is the illusion good enough that it no longer matters? Especially with regards to my first question. It's hard to say it's not X when we can't really define X.
- fredgrott 6mo agohow to tell its not AI or AGI..it throws a Molotov cocktail...
- pixel_popping 6mo agoYeah, Unitrees wouldn't aim that good.
- MontyCarloHall 6mo agoI don't think most people in tech are quite aware of the level of visceral AI hatred amongst non-techies. I've personally witnessed the worst Thanksgiving dinnertable fight I've ever seen (after someone revealed that their recipe was AI-generated, a couple people literally spat out the food they were enjoying and threw their plates in the trash), and a divorce (a very solid marriage between two people who were once both staunchly anti-AI unraveled within weeks after one of them changed their tune and adopted AI at work).
- alfalfasprout 6mo agoIt's quite prevalent in tech too-- however, folks tend to be quiet because the "use AI for everything or else" hammer is being used across the industry.
- therobots927 6mo agoMost SV people live in a bubble inside of a bubble. They don’t understand how their words come across to a significant portion of the population. If they did they would shut the fuck up.
- baal80spam 6mo agoNot sure why you were downvoted so heavily. SV is a bubble if I've seen one.
- lexarflash8g 6mo agoSilicon Valley just means a concentration of influential and powerful actors including venture capitalists, executives, entrepreneurs who decide the fate of the technology industry. Basically the elites of the XYZ sector. Same can be applied for DC (politics/military), NY (finance), LA (entertainment). SV was around since the 60-90s but didn't get much attention until beginning of this millenium due to the huge value creation and control they had over the US economy. They just happen to be relevant in recent times. 100s of years ago it was the railroad and oil conglomerates, 1000s of years ago kings and feudal lords. So there is always a powerful influential class who controls the strings -- its a feature of human society.
- jorgonda 6mo agoPutting millions of people out of work comes with consequences. We are going to see more and more of this.
- randyrand 6mo agoWhich jobs? Most of that is still AI hype.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo agoThe jobs that the hype is referring to. Any lack of veracity is moot to whether or not it's convincing, else there would be no reason for it.
- strange_quark 6mo agoI agree with you, it’s mostly hype. But it doesn’t really matter whether it’s true or not because the vibes are clearly bad. These execs keep “warning” us about that AI will take all the jobs then keep pouring more money into AI, the press credulously reports it, and people are obviously worried. Most people aren’t digging through economic data themselves to figure out these execs are full of shit.
- potsandpans 6mo agoI am by no means trying to justify anything. Whether "the jobs" have been lost or not is irrelevant. There's something to be said of the leadership here raising a trillion dollars to do that very thing. It's not hard to imagine an outsider taking him at face value. If this guy says publicly, "I'm building a robot that is going to fundamentally change the economy by making most knowledge based jobs obsolete." Then proceeds to play a major role in propping up the economy on this idea. At some point, people are going to get concerned.
- nullocator 6mo agoWhether you personally believe AI has cost jobs or not is irrelevant, in the last three years companies publicly and vocally have laid hundreds of thousands of layoffs at the feet of "AI".
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- therobots927 6mo agoThink occupy Wall Street but cranked up significantly. That’s what’s coming. Like it or not.
- linkage 6mo agoI hope "cranked up" was a pun
- EGreg 6mo agoI've been saying for years on here... to the people on HN who are against blockchain but bullish on AI With blockchain and smart contracts or stupid even memecoins, you can only lose what you voluntarily put in. You had to jump through a few hoops, then maybe you got rugpulled, maybe you became a millionaire. With AI, regardless of whether you consented or not, you can lose your job, gradually your relationships and sense of purpose. And if some malicious actors want to weaponize it against you, you can lose your reputation, your freedom, get hacked at scale, and much more. The sooner we give biolabs to everyone the sooner someone can create an advanced persistent threat virus online infecting every openclaw machine, or a designer virus with an incubation period of half a year. And I know what someone on here will always say. There will always be a comment to the effect of "this has always existed, AI is nothing new". But quantity has a quality all its own. Enjoy your AI slop internet dark forest. Until you don't.
- kupadapuku 6mo ago[dead]
- Centigonal 6mo agoIs your definition of bullish "believes the technology will be widely adopted across society and accrue significant wealth to its owners?" - if so, I think it's very clear how someone could be bullish on AI and not blockchain. You don't have to like AI to see it as an inexorable transformer (ha!) of society and wealth. Is your definition of bullish "believes the technology is a major net good for society?" - if so, you're comparing two technologies with significant social aspirations that come from very different philosophical backgrounds. While both are techno-optimist, Blockchain is a fundamentally libertarian technology, while generative AI comes from a more utilitarian, capital-focused background. People who value individual freedom above all else will get excited about blockchain and feel mixed-to-negative about AI, while people who want to elevate the overall capability of the human race to the exclusion of anything else will get excited by AI and see blockchain as a parlor trick.
- rambrrest 6mo agoThis will only get worse imo - regardless of how Sam is perceived - there is anger against AI which is growing amongst the people. I think we as a society need to stop and have the conversation and be more thoughtful about how we integrate AI with everything.
- pixel_popping 6mo agoI don't think this is possible yet, because many people refuse to think AI would be eventually better than us at practically anything (at least anything virtual), they keep talking about what's "current" while I think it's completely irrelevant for that discussion, people need to assume extreme intelligence and orchestration tools (and robots) will be there, worldwide, it's a *fact*, not just a maybe.
- classified 6mo agoYour "fact" is pure vaporware and hallucination.
- pixel_popping 6mo agoLet's talk about it again in 5 years, but 1-2 years from now, at the very least, coding will be over in the sense that the best models will do it better than the best (or the 99.99%). I don't think I'm hallucinating no, when my own work went from coding+managing+bunch of other stuff to just orchestrating and my output is just insanely higher and I literally have a bunch of friends that went from coding 8h a day to just "pretending to code" and just using a bunch of agents and get paid the same salary for working 30min a day, that's real, not an hallucination.
- classified 6mo ago> in 5 years That's literally the same argument that the blockchain gurus made, and each following year it was still 5 years in the future. I'm getting strong Real Soon Now™ vibes.
- nickvec 6mo agohttps://archive.ph/aoXIY https://archive.ph/aoXIY @dang didn't see this post before posting the archive.ph link at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722344 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722344 - feel free to delete/merge that thread with this one
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo agoYou should link to the actual source and include the archive link as the post text or as a top-level comment. The domain displayed next to the link will otherwise be the archive domain, which does not inform readers about the source. Also, @mentions are not implemented on HN; email hn@ycombinator.com to get mod attention. (And you can confirm with them what I wrote about archive links.)
- gnabgib 6mo agoThe link goes to a dead post (because archive - but there's nothing to merge), you're posting to an account that has posted/failed with archive links before and used @ before.. not sure what you're hoping for here.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo agoI am hoping to inform them? It does not appear their comments with attempted @mentions have informative replies, and posting a link to an archive domain will mean it's dead-on-arrival. Unless someone vouches and then comments on one of those posts, there isn't really an opportunity for a commenter to tell them. I suppose part of your point is that they should be able to see that the post is dead; that regardless does not tell them why the post is dead. I'm also not totally convinced they can see that the post is dead. When an account is shadow-banned on this forum they can still log in and post but their posts will all be dead to everyone except them; naively, it is plausible to me that they actually cannot see that the posts are dead because they were DOA. In other words, even though the account is not shadow-banned, the domain might be. Anyway, hope that helps.
- strongpigeon 6mo agoIt is a bit scary how people seem to genuinely be OK with violence (see this reddit thread [0]). Is just me or does it feel like the overall "temperature" has gone up. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1shugf8/firebomb_thrown_at_sam_altmans_mansion_in/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1shugf8/firebomb_t...
- therobots927 6mo agoIt is scary. You know what’s also scary? Being told a robot is going to take your job and healthcare away. There’s a lot of scary shit going on.
- pixel_popping 6mo agoI agree it is scary, but why would a robot take healthcare away? Wouldn't that be the contrary?
- therobots927 6mo ago1. Americans need a job to get healthcare 2. Robots take away jobs from Americans and the proceeds to go the owner (investor) class 3. Americans no longer have healthcare Understand?
- pixel_popping 6mo agoI understand (I'm not from the US), however, wouldn't healthcare in the US would get drastically cheaper (even eventually free?) if hospitals/clinics were composed of humanoids instead of humans?
- WBrentWilliams 6mo agoInteresting idea. I cannot say that I can answer affirmatively nor negatively. There are also human elements to be considered. Humans are status-seeking social creatures. There will always be a stain of humanoid-delivered care, no matter how high-quality, as being not as high quality of all-human delivered care. This is, status accounts for a lot. I can also draw pictures of how dangerous humanoid care can be, as there is a possibility in a break in the chain of responsibility. If a human medical professional messes up, you (or your survivors) can sue and seek damages directly, as well as sue the hospital and insurance system (with mixed results). With humanoids? Currently, the bar is higher as the entity being sued is not the hospital, nor a person, or even a team. The only entities that can be addressed are the corporation the runs the hospital and the corporation that produced the humanoid. These two entities have an incredible out-sized advantage in terms of sheer delaying tactics, not to mention arbitration clauses and other legal innovations. Most injured will simply give up, which is a legal win for the two entities. In my opinion, humanoid care will take a large amount of time, damage, and treasure to lower the costs. No actor will willingly give up their cash flow. My view may be too strong.
- boznz 6mo agoI guess this is what we get when the media and politicians go all in with their AI populist hate. I don't think I've seen a positive AI headline outside of the tech press, and even then they are pretty thin. Abundance and growing the pie for everyone is also an outcome if this is done right.
- lexicality 6mo ago> Abundance and growing the pie for everyone is also an outcome if this is done right. Do you genuinely believe there's any chance that's going to happen?
- senordevnyc 6mo agoLooking at the last few hundred years of our civilization, absolutely!
- MiguelX413 6mo ago[flagged]
- senordevnyc 6mo agoSubstantive. Try this, I'm genuinely curious: if you were going to be born as a random human somewhere on earth, what year would you prefer that to happen?
- cleversomething 6mo agoIf I can choose the US specifically, then sometime in the 1950s. I think Baby Boomers in the US will go down as the single luckiest generation on earth in terms of socioeconomic opportunity.
- senordevnyc 6mo agoYeah, I don't disagree, but if we're talking about how our species (which I took "civilization" to mean) as a whole has fared, I think you shouldn't get to pick the where, just the when. If we care about all humans everywhere, and whether fewer of them are starving or dying of preventable diseases or whatever, then I think you have to consider being born as just a random human, not just a random American.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 6mo agoOne thing I have idly wondered is how much do the ultra rich protect themselves from theft or kidnapping. Is it just not a real concern? If Taylor Swift owns a dozen homes, does she have full time security guards at each one? Or just accept some amount of burglary may occur? Do they go everywhere with a guard? Only to public events?
- ciupicri 6mo ago> accept some amount of burglary may occur? From https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/13/entertainment/kim-kardashian-paris-burglary-trial-intl https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/13/entertainment/kim-kardash... > Kim Kardashian, testifying in the trial of the burglars accused of tying her up and robbing her at gunpoint nearly nine years ago, told a Paris court on Tuesday that she “absolutely thought” her assailants would kill her. > “I have babies, I have to make it home, I have babies,” Kardashian recalled pleading with the armed men, who had broken into her hotel room while she slept during Paris Fashion Week in 2016. > Facing her alleged attackers for the first time since the heist, the billionaire reality TV star detailed how she was robbed of nearly $10 million in cash and jewelry, including a $4 million engagement ring – gifted to her by her then-husband Kanye West – that was never recovered.
- bombcar 6mo agoIt varies and they don't talk about it (obviously) but you can glean things from various sources. The more "public" the ultra rich are, the more they'll have security, especially noticeable security. The silent or unknown ones will often still have something (usually a requirement of their or their company's insurance). Once you graduate from "2, 3, 5 houses" to "mansions" you will have staff at each one, even if relatively bare-bones.
- 2dfs 6mo agoYeah but theyre useless if a large organised group shows up.
- sleepybrett 6mo ago
- SilentM68 6mo agoHmm, that's troubling but predictable. The idea that AI will bring an age of abundance may be true, but not in the short term. Companies are letting people go, and AI will be blamed for that, whether true or not. For decades the public perception that most Tech Bros have prioritized profits over the wellbeing of the little guy is well established, in my view, in some cases well deserved with no accountability. It's looking like AI will generate a modern version of the early 1800s Luddite Rebellion where British textile workers destroyed machines that displaced jobs, prioritizing factory owners' profits over workers. They targeted technology and industrialists. Tech Bros can avoid this by modifying their priorities, prioritize employee rights and lobbying governments to begin implementing some sort of Universal Basic Income of some sort and or provide the means by which people can survive, or the government may start marketing Soylent Green to consumers :(
- whimblepop 6mo ago> It's looking like AI will generate a modern version of the early 1800s Luddite Rebellion where British textile workers destroyed machines that displaced jobs, prioritizing factory owners' profits over workers. They targeted technology and industrialists. It's worth remembering that the way that ended was extremely bloody, particularly for the Luddites themselves. There were a handful of extreme participants, there was a murder, and there was a hell of a lot of violence directed at anyone perceived as a Luddite— even though most actual Luddites themselves mostly avoided violence against other humans. It would be good if we can somehow avoid such outcomes this time.
- SilentM68 6mo agoGreed drives most of the current crop of Tech Bros. I once had the chance to be a Bro, far richer than any of the current ones, thanks to the still secretive and anonymous "original-sn-adjacent cryptographic collective". Things, however, did not work out in my favor thanks to other nefarious third-party actors. So, I know where from I speak. Any outcome is in the hands of the Tech Bros but by the looks of it, greed drives their every action, so things are not looking good! :(
- pesus 6mo ago
- EcommerceFlow 6mo ago[flagged]
- xiphias2 6mo agoAI is unstoppable as the algorithmic changes are at least as fast as compute improvements. One proof of it is that even older GPUs' value is going up.
- MiguelX413 6mo agoWhat exactly does that mean?
- GlibMonkeyDeath 6mo agoWonder if it has anything to do with the New Yorker article... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659135 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659135 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may...
- tedd4u 6mo agoTrigger warning: AI animation of uncanny-valley Sam Altman "hydra"
- surround 6mo agoIt seems Sam Altman has the same suspicion, based upon his response: > There was an incendiary article about me a few days ago. Someone said to me yesterday they thought it was coming at a time of great anxiety about AI and that it made things more dangerous for me. https://blog.samaltman.com/2279512 https://blog.samaltman.com/2279512 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724921 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724921
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- anematode 6mo agoUnlikely – no one is starting off undecided, then reading one article in The New Yorker and then committing this. And it's a slippery slope to tie it to legitimate criticism.
- Teever 6mo ago[flagged]
- stevenwoo 6mo agoMinistry of the Future beat you to the punch with victims of human driven climate change shooting down thousands of private planes with drones as protest.
- elsonrodriguez 6mo agoOne of the biggest fantasies in that book is that the "protesters" would be so unified and ethical in their plots. In real life the attacks in response to climate change(and in this case, economic injustice), will be committed by such an uncountable plurality of groups that the violence will seem almost capricious.
- camillomiller 6mo ago[flagged]
- supliminal 6mo ago[flagged]
- solid_fuel 6mo agoOn something like... attack drones targeting the ultra wealthy? I (and probably the FBI) would love to see your pitch deck.
- niemandhier 6mo ago"Respice post te! Hominem te esse memento!"
- bartvk 6mo ago"Look behind you! Remember that you are a man."
- sleepybrett 6mo agoWe can only hope that when they reveal the identity of this guy he happens to have a name that overlaps the mario bros. universe.
- ChoGGi 6mo agoWhen you constantly preach on how your company is able to save money by taking away jobs, I have no fucking sympathy for you.
- supliminal 6mo ago[flagged]
- LNSY 6mo agoAnti-Semitism is socialism for idiots. Take your nazi shit elsewhere.
- glitchc 6mo ago[flagged]
- QuantumGood 6mo agoDefinitely deplorable. If he is as many claim him to be, and the info about pushing hard to control the narrative recently is accurate, the timing certainly is suspect. But part of the point of a false flag is to make it hard to discuss whether it is a false flag, and ideally to see that it is never determined one way or another.
- DoneWithAllThat 6mo ago[flagged]
- richardfeynman 6mo ago[flagged]
- 34qjgh 6mo agoIt certainly is a highly convenient timing just before the Musk lawsuit against OpenAI. Only minor damage was caused to a metal gate far from the building. Yet people here speak of "bombing Altman". So the sympathy works, and might work on the jury in that trial as well.
- wunderlotus 6mo agoIt’s plausible but gosh, I certainly hope not. That is such a sad world to live in.
- networkOne 6mo agoI bet the molotov cocktail was made via instructions from ChatGPT.
- dlev_pika 6mo agoI’m surprised we haven’t heard more direct action incidents - there is no way the shameless behavior of our high profile oligarchs is not ruffling a few feathers too much. Maybe they are just not reporting near misses
- otikik 6mo ago[flagged]
- bnwrt 6mo agoSf Chronicle speaks of an "alleged attack", where a Molotov Cocktail was thrown at the outer gate. Looking at the picture there was zero chance of the house catching fire. https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/molotov-cocktail-ceo-home-russian-hill-22199323.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/molotov-cocktail-c... So the arrested suspect is either the wrong person, did not actually want to kill anyone or has no clue how fire spreads. A strange incident that will make many people think of sending a noose to oneself (where oneself does not have to be Altman, but a pro-AI org who wants to generate sympathy).
- dmitrygr 6mo agoNo surprise given that a full quarter of these on one side of the political spectrum consider political violence acceptable (~25%. Same figure is 9% for self-identified moderates, 3% for the other side). Source: https://rb.gy/wdzmsc https://rb.gy/wdzmsc (YouGov poll, n=2,646, date = sep 10, 2025, question = "Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals? (%)", raw data linked under poll graph, downloadable )
- randyrand 6mo ago“ever”? So we’re not limited to reality or likely scenarios? Just anything I make up as if I was writing a creative fiction novel? I’m not sure how much this question actually measures propensity towards violence, than it does creativity and imagination.
- dmitrygr 6mo agoYes political violence is NEVER justifiable. That is the one and only correct answer if you wish to live in a modern society. And believe me, you do not want to live in the other kind
- randyrand 6mo agoThe question is not limited to modern society! Or even humanity! Just “ever”. I mean what does the universe even look like in hundreds of millions of years? Humans won’t even be around.
- dmitrygr 6mo agoI am not going to play pretend with you. Sorry that you dislike what you see so much as to nitpick to such a microscopic level, such is the data.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- animanoir 6mo ago[dead]
- hgoel 6mo agoI'm sorry he, his family and his community had to deal with this, no one should have to go through this kind of thing. I also think that he might've been able to reduce the odds of this happening by being a less awful human being.
- mvkel 6mo agoDo you know him personally?
- GoToRO 6mo ago[flagged]
- whatisthiseven 6mo agoYou mean like this article that has been making the rounds recently? The huge famous one that Altman himself called out in his post talking about the attack? https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may...
- GoToRO 6mo agoPaywal. Are you just musk fanboys?
- BrokenCogs 6mo ago[dead]
- giardini 6mo agoJoe Biden's recommendation to Sam (and all of us):"Buy a Shotgun": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-mztxHgYQo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-mztxHgYQo Joe sings great harmony in this video by the way!
- asdaqopqkq 6mo agofalse flag? for sympathy, especially with the hit piece after hit piece on him
- cindyllm 6mo ago[dead]
- mathcartney 6mo ago[flagged]
- archdang 6mo agoEffective and plentiful assassin drones are part of our future.
- HanyouHottie 6mo agoSlaughterbots (2017) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA