mvkel

7 ms·

1.
by mvkel 7d ago
This is barely prompting 101. Author is essentially saying "instead of asking it to just make a poster, ask it to make a poster in [aesthetic]." This has nothing to do with design. Is bauhaus the best aesthetic choice for a spring
2.
by mvkel 7d ago
Like HDR photos of the mid-2000s, these too shall pass.
3.
by mvkel 8d ago
I want minimal in size, not capability
4.
by mvkel 12d ago
More proof that it's not that a human -can't- do it, it's just that no human would dedicate their entire lifetime to solving this niche challenge.
5.
by mvkel 17d ago
apple needs to rethink so much more fundamentally. Ternus talks identically to Tim Cook. Indistinguishable. It’s like when Jobs left, Apple became a reflection of the superficial touchstones that Jobs left behind, rather than the CEO defini
6.
by mvkel 18d ago
A person needs to die for us to assign liability and pursue justice. If fewer people die, there is no liability to assign. It sounds like you're arguing for a human being to die to preserve a human being to blame. Which yeah, sounds ju
7.
by mvkel 18d ago
What you're talking about is who to blame, not how to keep more people alive.
8.
by mvkel 19d ago
It should be a defense for FSD to exist though, right? Net more alive people.
9.
by mvkel 19d ago
So you're saying temporarily cutting off internet access in a specific geographical region is destroying the internet?
10.
by mvkel 20d ago
> The internet has already been turned off in localized areas This is an oxymoron.
11.
by mvkel 20d ago
The Internet virtually indestructible against people smarter than a toddler. It's already impossible to turn off. We would need to prevent the models from getting smarter.
12.
by mvkel 20d ago
This is some Terminator version of destroying humanity, but a super intelligent AI could be much more insidious, and simple. It looks a lot more like social engineering. One easy, obvious example that has also been explored a thousand times
13.
by mvkel 21d ago
There are plans up through ARC 7 on the roadmap
14.
by mvkel 21d ago
If you read what ARC-AGI has stated from day one, the tests are designed to stress frontier models in tasks that humans are uniquely good at. When the models get to 100%, the next set of tasks is deployed. When they run out of ideas for how
15.
by mvkel 23d ago
Take it from the mouth of the creator of ARC-AGI: When we released ARC 3, I got asked, "when do you think a frontier model will saturate it?", and I answered "in about a year, though it depends on how much it gets explicitly
16.
by mvkel 23d ago
The ARC-AGI-3 score is an incredible feat. It needed to effectively create a symbolic world model from scratch to solve the games. If you've played the games firsthand, you know what an accomplishment this is. The "games" fee
17.
by mvkel 1mo ago
I'm kind of surprised, but not surprised, by Gates' comments here. Until very recently, apparently, he was a pretty strong techno optimist, now toeing the line of a doomer. The verbiage is substantially in line with the fear-based
18.
by mvkel 1mo ago
If there are 10 people on a social network, are you allowed to call it "curated"?
19.
by mvkel 1mo ago
Netflix had an algorithm contest, when was it, like 20 years ago? A team made a highly effective content recommendation system and Netflix never used it. Why? It killed revenue. Separately, there simply isn't enough content to recommen
20.
by mvkel 2mo ago
They launched their model a week ago, completely closed, selling an endpoint. Then when nobody bought, they "open" sourced it. Ok.
21.
by mvkel 2mo ago
This reads similar to a politician saying "I was hacked!" when embarrassing texts leak.
22.
by mvkel 2mo ago
TLDR: content is AI generated whether you think it is, or not. https://news.adobe.com/news/2026/06/creators-toolkit-report-... https://manuscriptreport.com/data/ai-publishing-statistics
23.
by mvkel 2mo ago
> a lot The data disagrees.
24.
by mvkel 2mo ago
Actions matter more than words. Sure, they're complaining about AI, but consuming AI content more and more. It's a bit like people who complain that everything on the news is always bad. Everyone hates it, yet it's what every
25.
by mvkel 2mo ago
Things are constantly changing. For example, a new building might have two or three tenants, so entire floors can be skipped. But then five years later, the whole building is full. I would bet that every new algorithm after LOOK is just dif
26.
by mvkel 2mo ago
I don't get it. We're snobs about facts being more accurate? In a system that is innocent before guilty, more accuracy favors the person.
27.
by mvkel 2mo ago
Now imagine dumping the corpus of this case into an LLM and asking it to find discrepancies. I'll bet your bollocks to a barn dance that it'd point out the extra underscore. This is yet another example of human confirmation bias l
28.
by mvkel 2mo ago
That's a good point, but this isn't just one student; it's EVERY student (oh god I sound like AI)
29.
by mvkel 2mo ago
I'm not disputing that students cheat using AI, and that professors catch them and enact consequences. But this video is a little suspicious. The fact that none of the 32 students bothered to even read the generated output feels strang
30.
by mvkel 2mo ago
My point was that it was critiquing a development process from 2023 in 2026, regardless of the term used.

More ›