5 ms·
What percentage of this is lawslop? https://github.com/righttoprivacyact/bill/tree/main/tests https://github.com/righttoprivacyact/bill/tree/main/tests There’
by tolerance 7mo ago
What percentage of this is lawslop?
https://github.com/righttoprivacyact/bill/tree/main/tests https://github.com/righttoprivacyact/bill/tree/main/tests
There’s clearly a non-trivial level of LLM involvement.
I want to say 100% lawslop. I can’t figure out who’s behind this to ascertain their qualifications and acumen in the space.
100% seems like a safe place to start speculating from but I can be talked down.
- garyfirestorm 7mo agoAs opposed to bills sponsored by real people that completely decimated privacy? Patriot Act? I’ll take slop that has some semblance of reasonable privacy protection any day.
- ramon156 7mo agoThere's some obvious issues that come with LLM generated bills. LLMs tend to stay very generic, to have a lower chance of being "wrong". I could also ask my 5 year old to draw a bill for me, that's as successful as giving a generic bill.
- int_19h 7mo ago> LLMs tend to stay very generic, to have a lower chance of being "wrong". It depends entirely on how you prompt them.
- lich_king 7mo agoYeah, most charitably, it seems to be some sort of an LLM art project. And it's another day when we engage with slop because it happens to say something we like.
- duskdozer 7mo agoWho has ever written like this: (a) In general.—There are authorized
- ddtaylor 7mo agoI think this kind of argument is a modified version of an ad-hominem attack. When you disagree with an argument, you are supposed to address the argument itself, not the thing making the argument.
- hananova 7mo agoAd-hominem (literally: "to the person") requires a person on the other side of the argument. This wasn't made or written by a person, thus ad-hominem does not apply.
- grumpymuppet 7mo agoPresumably why the person you are responding to called it a modified ad hominem.
- samrus 7mo agoThats a bit pedantic. Youre still arguing against an entity rather than addressing the argument. If you prompted an LLM to make a PSA that people should brush their teeth, is it a fair to argue that brushing your teeth is bad because an LLM made the argument?
- egberts1 7mo agoLet's call it "Ad machinam". A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has. Example usage: “That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”
- normalaccess 7mo agoAnd really when you think about it, all AI is is just the a statical recombination of (almost) everything that (almost) everyone has written. So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.
- 7mo ago
- stackedinserter 7mo agoIt all makes sense, I don't care if it's LLM-generated or not. I'm fine with 100% LLM-written bill if it protects me from Flock et al.
- normalaccess 7mo agoI agree, and it wont... We will all be tracked at all times as the new global economy is created. Biblical times.