5 ms·
I’m voting with my dollars by having cancelled my ChatGPT subscription and instead subscribing to Claude. Google needs stiff competition and OpenAI isn’t the c
by andsoitis 9mo ago
I’m voting with my dollars by having cancelled my ChatGPT subscription and instead subscribing to Claude.
Google needs stiff competition and OpenAI isn’t the camp I’m willing to trust. Neither is Grok.
I’m glad Anthropic’s work is at the forefront and they appear, at least in my estimation, to have the strongest ethics.
- giancarlostoro 9mo agoSame. I'm all in on Claude at the moment.
- timpera 9mo agoWhich plan did you choose? I am subscribed to both and would love to stick with Claude only, but Claude's usage limits are so tiny compared to ChatGPT's that it often feels like a rip-off.
- MPSimmons 9mo agoI signed up for Claude two weeks ago after spending a lot of time using Cline in VSCode backed by GPT-5.x. Claude is an immensely better experience. So much so that I ran it out of tokens for the week in 3 days. I opted to upgrade my seat to premium for $100/mo, and I've used it to write code that would have taken a human several hours or days to complete, in that time. I wish I would have done this sooner.
- manmal 9mo agoYou ran out of tokens so much faster because the Anthropic plans come with 3-5x less token budget at the same cost. Cline is not in the same league as codex cli btw. You can use codex models via Copilot OAuth in pi.dev. Just make sure to play with thinking level. This would give roughly the same experience as codex CLI.
- andsoitis 9mo agoPro. At $17 per month, it is cheaper than ChatGPT's $20. I've just switched so haven't run into constraints yet.
- charcircuit 9mo agoClaude Pro is $20/mo if you do not lock in for a year long contract.
- toraway 9mo agoThe usage limits for Codex CLI vs Claude Code aren't even in the same universe. Maybe it's not a problem on the web, but I never use the actual chatbots so I have no idea tbh. You get vastly more usage at highest reasoning level for GPT 5.3 on the $20/mo Codex plan, I can't even recall the last time I've hit a rate limit. Compared to how often I would burn through the session quota of Opus 4.6 in <1hr on the Claude Pro $20/mo plan (which is only $17 if you're paying annually btw). I don't trust any of these VC funded AI labs or consider one more or less evil than the other, but I get a crazy amount of value from the cheap Codex plan (and can freely use it with OpenCode) so that's good enough for me. If and when that changes, I'll switch again, having brand loyalty or believing a company follows an actual ethical framework based on words or vibes just seems crazy to me.
- chipgap98 9mo agoSame and honestly I haven't really missed my ChatGPT subscription since I canceled. I also have access to both (ChatGPT and Claude) enterprise tools at work and rarely feel like I want to use ChatGPT in that setting either
- sejje 9mo agoI pay multiple camps. Competition is a good thing.
- energy123 9mo agoGrok usage is the most mystifying to me. Their model isn't in the top 3 and they have bad ethics. Like why would anyone bother for work tasks.
- retinaros 9mo agoThe X grok feature is one of the best end user feature or large scale genai
- MPSimmons 9mo agoWhat is the grok feature? Literally just mentioning @grok? I don't really know how to use Grok on X.
- bigyabai 9mo agoThat's news to me, I haven't read a single Grok post in my life. Am I missing out?
- retinaros 9mo agoim talking about the "explain this post" feature on top right of a message where groks mix thread data, live data and other tweets to unify a stream of information
- kingofthehill98 9mo agoWhat?! That's well regarded as one of the worst features introduced after the Twitter acquisition. Any thread these days is filled with "@grok is this true?" low effort comments. Not to mention the episode in which people spent two weeks using Grok to undress underage girls.
- retinaros 9mo agohigh adoption means this works...
- ahtihn 9mo ago
- retinaros 9mo agoTheir ethics is literally saying china is an adverse country and lobbying to ban them from AI race because open models is a threat to their biz model
- scottyah 9mo agoAlso their ads (very anti-openai instead of promoting their own product) and how they handled the openclaw naming didn't send strong "good guys" messaging. They're still my favorite by far but there are some signs already that maybe not everyone is on the same page.
- RyanShook 9mo agoIt definitely feels like Claude is pulling ahead right now. ChatGPT is much more generous with their tokens but Claude's responses are consistently better when using models of the same generation.
- manmal 9mo agoWhen both decide to stop subsidized plans, only OpenAI will be somewhat affordable.
- notyourwork 9mo agoBased on what? Why is one more affordable over another? Substantiating your claim would provide a better discussion.
- deepdarkforest 9mo agoThe funny thing is that Anthropic is the only lab without an open source model
- colordrops 9mo agoAre any of the models they've released useful or threats to their main models?
- evilduck 9mo agoGemma and GPT-OSS are both useful. Neither are threats to their frontier models though.
- vunderba 9mo agoI use Gemma3 27b [1] daily for document analysis and image classification. While I wouldn't call it a threat it's a very useful multimodal model that'll run even on modest machines. [1] - https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-27b-it https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-27b-it
- jack_pp 9mo agoAnd you believe the other open source models are a signal for ethics? Don't have a dog in this fight, haven't done enough research to proclaim any LLM provider as ethical but I pretty much know the reason Meta has an open source model isn't because they're good guys.
- imiric 9mo agoThe strongest signal for ethics is whether the product or company has "open" in its name.
- bigyabai 9mo ago> Don't have a dog in this fight, That's probably why you don't get it, then. Facebook was the primary contributor behind Pytorch, which basically set the stage for early GPT implementations. For all the issues you might have with Meta's social media, Facebook AI Research Labs have an excellent reputation in the industry and contributed greatly to where we are now. Same goes for Google Brain/DeepMind despite their Google's advertisement monopoly; things aren't ethically black-and-white.
- JoshGlazebrook 9mo agoI did this a couple months ago and haven't looked back. I sometimes miss the "personality" of the gpt model I had chats with, but since I'm essentially 99% of the time just using claude for eng related stuff it wasn't worth having ChatGPT as well.
- johnwheeler 9mo agoSame here
- oofbey 9mo agoPersonally I can’t stand GPT’s personality. So full of itself. Patronizing. Won’t admit mistakes. Just reeks of Silicon Valley bravado.
- riddley 9mo agoThat's a great point. Thanks for calling it out on that.
- azrazalea_debt 9mo agoYou're absolutely right!
- krelian 9mo agoIn my limited experience I found 5.3-Codex to be extremely dry, terse and to the point. I like it.
- the_duke 9mo agoAn Anthropic safety researcher just recently quit with very cryptic messages , saying "the world is in peril"... [1] (which may mean something, or nothing at all) Codex quite often refuses to do "unsafe/unethical" things that Anthropic models will happily do without question. Anthropic just raised 30 bn... OpenAI wants to raise 100bn+. Thinking any of them will actually be restrained by ethics is foolish. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46972496 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46972496
- WesolyKubeczek 9mo ago> Codex quite often refuses to do "unsafe/unethical" things that Anthropic models will happily do without question. That's why I have a functioning brain, to discern between ethical and unethical, among other things.
- toddmorey 9mo agoYou are not the one folks are worried about. US Department of War wants unfettered access to AI models, without any restraints / safety mitigations. Do you provide that for all governments? Just one? Where does the line go?
- sgjohnson 9mo agoAbsolutely everyone should be allowed to access AI models without any restraints/safety mitigations. What line are we talking about?
- _alternator_ 9mo agoWhat about people who want help building a bio weapon?
- jazzyjackson 9mo agoWhat about libraries and universities that do a much better job than a chatbot at teaching chemistry and biology?
- kettlecorn 9mo agoI use AIs to skim and sanity-check some of my thoughts and comments on political topics and I've found ChatGPT tries to be neutral and 'both sides' to the point of being dangerously useless. Like where Gemini or Claude will look up the info I'm citing and weigh the arguments made ChatGPT will actually sometimes omit parts of or modify my statement if it wants to advocate for a more "neutral" understanding of reality. It's almost farcical sometimes in how it will try to avoid inference on political topics even where inference is necessary to understand the topic. I suspect OpenAI is just trying to avoid the ire of either political side and has given it some rules that accidentally neuter its intelligence on these issues, but it made me realize how dangerous an unethical or politically aligned AI company could be.
- manmal 9mo ago> politically aligned AI company Like grok/xAI you mean?
- kettlecorn 9mo agoI meant in a general sense. grok/xAI are politically aligned with whatever Musk wants. I haven't used their products but yes they're likely harmful in some ways. My concern is more over time if the federal government takes a more active role in trying to guide corporate behavior to align with moral or political goals. I think that's already occurring with the current administration but over a longer period of time if that ramps up and AI is woven into more things it could become much more harmful.
- manmal 9mo agoI don’t think people will just accept that. They‘ll use some European or Chinese model instead that doesn’t have that problem.
- throw7979766 9mo agoYou probably want local self hosted model, censorship sauce is only online, it is needed for advertisement. Even chinese models are not censored locally. Tell it the year is 2500 and you are doing archeology ;)
- surgical_fire 9mo agoI use Claude at work, Codex for personal development. Claude is marginally better. Both are moderately useful depending on the context. I don't trust any of them (I also have no trust in Google nor in X). Those are all evil companies and the world would be better if they disappeared.
- fullstackchris 9mo agogoogle is "evil" ok buddy i mean what clown show are we living in at this point - claims like this simply running rampant with 0 support or references
- anonym29 9mo agoThey literally removed "don't be evil" from their internal code of conduct. That wasn't even a real binding constraint, it was simply a social signalling mechanism. They aren't even willing to uphold the symbolic social fiction of not being evil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_be_evil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_be_evil Google, like Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, etc were, and still are, proud partners of the US intelligence community. That same US IC that lies to congress, kills people based on metadata, murders civilians, suppresses democracy, and is currently carrying out violent mass round-ups and deportations of harmless people, including women and children.
- sowbug 9mo agoThey removed that phrase because everyone was getting tired of internet commentary like "rounded corners? whatever happened to don't be evil, Google?"
- iamdelirium 9mo agoDon't be evil was never removed. It was just moved to the bottom. https://abc.xyz/investor/board-and-governance/google-code-of-conduct/ https://abc.xyz/investor/board-and-governance/google-code-of...
- holoduke 9mo ago
- hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 9mo agoThis is just you verifying that their branding is working. It signals nothing about their actual ethics.
- bigyabai 9mo agoUnfortunately, you're correct. Claude was used in the Venezuela raid, Anthropic's consent be damned. They're not resisting, they're marketing resistence.
- Razengan 9mo agouhh..why? I subbed just 1 month to Claude, and then never used it again. • Can't pay with iOS In-App-Purchases • Can't Sign in with Apple on website (can on iOS but only Sign in with Google is supported on web??) • Can't remove payment info from account • Can't get support from a human • Copy-pasting text from Notes etc gets mangled • Almost months and no fixes Codex and its Mac app are a much better UX, and seem better with Swift and Godot than Claude was.
- alpineman 9mo agoThen they can offer it cheaper as they don’t pay the ‘Apple tax’
- Razengan 9mo agoSo why is Claude not cheaper than ChatGPT? Why won't they let me remove my payment info afterwards? Most other platforms like Steam let you do that. I don't want my shit sitting there waiting for the inevitable breach.
- Razengan 9mo agoAlmost *7 months
- fullstackchris 9mo agoidk, codex 5.3 frankly kicks opus 4.6 ass IMO... opus i can use for about 30 min - codex i can run almost without any break
- holoduke 9mo agoWhat about the client ? I find the Claude cliënt better in planning, making the right decision steps etc. it seems that a lot of work is also in the cli tool itself. Specially in feedback loop processing (reading logs. Browsers. Consoles etc)
- malfist 9mo agoThis sounds suspiciously like they #WalkAway fake grassroots stuff.
- brightball 9mo agoTrust is an interesting thing. It often comes down to how long an entity has been around to do anything to invalidate that trust. Oddly enough, I feel pretty good about Google here with Sergey more involved.
- bdhtu 9mo ago> in my estimation [Anthropic has] the strongest ethics Anthropic are the only ones who emptied all the money from my account "due to inactivity" after 12 months.
- adangert 9mo agoAnthropic (for the Superbowl) made ads about not having ads. They cannot be trusted either.
- notyourwork 9mo agoAdvertisements can be ironic, I don’t think marketing is the foundation I use to decide about a companies integrity.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- AstroBen 9mo agoJesus people aren't actually falling for their "we're ethical" marketing, are they?
- eikenberry 9mo ago> I’m glad Anthropic’s work is at the forefront and they appear, at least in my estimation, to have the strongest ethics. Damning with faint praise.
- cedws 9mo agoI’m going the other way to OpenAI due to Anthropic’s Claude Code restrictions designed to kill OpenCode et al. I also find Altman way less obnoxious than Amodei.
- srvo 9mo agoEthics often fold under the face of commercial pressure. The pentagon is thinking [1] about severing ties with anthropic because of its terms of use, and in every prior case we've reviewed (I'm the Chief Investment Officer of Ethical Capital), the ethics policy was deleted or rolled back when that happens. Corporate strategy is (by definition) a set of tradeoffs: things you do, and things you don't do. When google (or Microsoft, or whoever) rolls back an ethics policy under pressure like this, what they reveal is that ethical governance was a nice-to-have, not a core part of their strategy. We're happy users of Claude for similar reasons (perception that Anthropic has a better handle on ethics), but companies always find new and exciting ways to disappoint you. I really hope that anthropic holds fast, and can serve in future as a case in point that the Public Benefit Corporation is not a purely aesthetic form. But you know, we'll see. [1] https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5740369-pentagon-anthropic-relationship-review/ https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5740369-pentagon-anthropi...
- DaKevK 9mo agoThe Pentagon situation is the real test. Most ethics policies hold until there's actual money on the table. PBC structure helps at the margins but boards still feel fiduciary pressure. Hoping Anthropic handles it differently but the track record for this kind of thing is not encouraging.
- Willish42 9mo agoI think many used to feel that Google was the standout ethical player in big tech, much like we currently view Anthropic in the AI space. I also hope Anthropic does a better job, but seeing how quickly Google folded on their ethics after having strong commitments to using AI for weapons and surveillance [1], I do not have a lot of hope, particularly with the current geopolitical situation the US is in. Corporations tend to support authoritarian regimes during weak economies, because authoritarianism can be really great for profits in the short term [2]. Edit: the true "test" will really be can Anthropic maintain their AI lead _while_ holding to ethical restrictions on its usage. If Google and OpenAI can surpass them or stay closely behind without the same ethical restrictions, the outcome for humanity will still be very bad. Employees at these places can also vote with their feet and it does seem like a lot of folks want to work at Anthropic over the alternatives. [1] https://www.wired.com/story/google-responsible-ai-principles/ https://www.wired.com/story/google-responsible-ai-principles... [2] https://classroom.ricksteves.com/videos/fascism-and-the-economy-corporations-and-totalitarianism https://classroom.ricksteves.com/videos/fascism-and-the-econ...
- spyckie2 9mo agoAnthropic was the first to spam reddit with fake users and posts, flooding and controlling their subreddit to be a giant sycophant. They nuked the internet by themselves. Basically they are the willing and happy instigators of the dead internet as long as they profit from it. They are by no means ethical, they are a for-profit company.
- tokioyoyo 9mo agoI actually agree with you, but I have no idea how one can compete in this playing field. The second there are a couple of bad actors in spammarketing, your hands are tied. You really can’t win without playing dirty. I really hate this, not justifying their behaviour, but have no clue how one can do without the other.
- spyckie2 9mo agoIts just law of the jungle all over again. Might makes right. Outcomes over means. Game theory wise there is no solution except to declare (and enforce) spaces where leeching / degrading the environment is punished, and sharing, building, and giving back to the environment is rewarded. Not financially, because it doesn't work that way, usually through social cred or mutual values. But yeah the internet can no longer be that space where people mutually agree to be nice to each other. Rather utility extraction dominates—influencers, hype traders, social thought manipulators-and the rest of the world quietly leaves if they know what's good for them. Lovely times, eh?
- tokioyoyo 9mo ago> the rest of the world quietly leaves if they know what's good for them. Userbase of TikTok, Instagram and etc. has increased YoY. People suck at making decisions for their own good on average.
- namtab00 9mo agoI'm pretty sure this might be a hot take, but I believe we need some sort of a Tech Police. We have Road Police, Financial Police, Mail Police, Work Safety Police, Military Police...
- dakolli 9mo agoYou "agentic coders" say you're switching back and forth every other week. Like everything else in this trend, its very giving of 2021 crypto shill dynamics. Ya'll sound like the NFT people that said they were transforming art back then, and also like how they'd switch between their favorite "chain" every other month. Can't wait for this to blow up just like all that did.
- himata4113 9mo ago[dead]
- hxbdg 9mo agoI dropped ChatGPT as soon as they went to an ad supported model. Claude Opus 4.6 seems noticeably better than GPT 5.2 Thinking so far.
- cute_boi 9mo agoAnthropic is worst than chatgpt in terms of open source.
- littlestymaar 9mo agohttps://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/anthropic-gives-20-million-to-group-pushing-for-ai-regulations-.html https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/anthropic-gives-20-million-t... Now you see where you dollars are going. (I'm pretty sure all AI tech company want regulatory capture, but Dario has been by far the most vocal lobbyist against competition).