kouteiheika

4 ms·

1.
by kouteiheika 5d ago
> GPL is not a "use it however the fuck I want" license. Maybe you're thinking of the WTFPL? No. GPL is a "use it however the fuck you want" license. The GPL has no restrictions on *use*, only on redistribution
2.
by kouteiheika 8d ago
Related: https://huggingface.co/convaiinnovations/laya
3.
by kouteiheika 8d ago
> I've noticed the reasoning behaves... weirdly Is this with the full unquantized weights? There are some mystery meat quants on Huggingface for this model that are badly botched and lobotomize it (I've hit this personally when
4.
by kouteiheika 9d ago
> buy paid skills [..] curious to see if this resonates with folks here Probably not. I'm going to be a little bit reductive, but: why would I buy a markdown file that someone most likely got an LLM to generate while I can just simp
5.
by kouteiheika 9d ago
No. You don't need identical. For example, I have extra arguments in my edit file tool that the model can specify, and that works just fine.
6.
by kouteiheika 9d ago
> Much of the extra weight of Claude Code and Codex harness are (ostensibly?) for security and alignment purposes. Um, no? Have you actually read Claude Code's system prompt and tools? Here's Fable's system prompt: https:
7.
by kouteiheika 9d ago
> It appears newer models are better at narive harness tool calls and worse at custom tools that look similar to default tools. This is true. For example, the other day I was doing some testing with DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, and I gave it
8.
by kouteiheika 11d ago
FWIW, replying to people with AI generated replies is (at least to me) extremely disrespectful. Please don't do it without consent from the other party. If you expect someone (who isn't a bot) to make the effort to read what you w
9.
by kouteiheika 14d ago
It's almost certainly A/B test. Essentially everyone does it. You can even sometimes see when a list of videos on YT first loads and a given video has one title, and it suddenly switches to another without you reloading the page.
10.
by kouteiheika 15d ago
> They're cool with open weight AIs being released. As long as those AIs only ever say good things about CCP, and don't mention certain concentration camps or brutally suppressed protests. I asked recently released Qwen3.8-Flas
11.
by kouteiheika 15d ago
It's not a VM; it's containerized with a FUSE-based custom overlay, and the agent never touches a real mount (with two exceptions: passthrough read-only mounts for things like /bin, and ephemeral tmpfs mount at /tmp).
12.
by kouteiheika 15d ago
> What I've found difficult with harness design is deciding which features are actually going to be useful, and which ones are cool-sounding ideas that get people talking, but nobody actually uses in practice. It should be easy to t
13.
by kouteiheika 15d ago
> And every time I wonder where the people who create these tests are looking when they're deciding which harnesses to test? Well, everyone and their dog has a custom harness now (including myself!), and more often than not they&#x2
14.
by kouteiheika 16d ago
Yep. Just like a kitchen knife will make no attempt to prevent me from stabbing anyone with it. Here's a dirty secret though -- you don't actually need an abliterated/uncensored version of the model to get it to do this. I ca
15.
by kouteiheika 16d ago
> posts on American models are steered towards controversy and anti-AI sentiment, posts on Chinese models are full of blatant flattery So why, for example, are posts on the Inkling[1] release (an American model) thread mostly positive? I
16.
by kouteiheika 16d ago
Excuse me for not being interested in over 100 pages of how well the model can refuse and block my requests, especially considering how fun it is to waste my time trying to get around those restrictions when they inevitably trigger because
17.
by kouteiheika 16d ago
It's so refreshing to see DeepSeek's tech report[1] full of juicy details; meanwhile, something like Fable's system card[2] is like 70% "safety", 10% "model welfare" to make sure little Claude isn't d
18.
by kouteiheika 17d ago
> Did anyone else notice that all the use cases they show here are "use ChatGPT Images to imagine all the things you'd like to have, but don't"? What else could they highlight? The other major use case for these model
19.
by kouteiheika 18d ago
Note that these quants are not quantized uniformly, so 4-bit isn't actually a "true" 4-bit here, so these observations won't necessarily hold up to other quants which might be done differently.
20.
by kouteiheika 22d ago
> Specifically, all it took to boost Qwen3.8-27B to get 10% more points on SWEbench Pro and Terminal Bench 2.0 with a proxy that has just these basics Do you have a link/paper for this you could share?
21.
by kouteiheika 22d ago
> because their output is non-deterministic by design. It isn't. At least not by design, even though in practice it often can be. If you do greedy decoding (or use a preset seed) and deterministically compute everything (e.g. only u
22.
by kouteiheika 22d ago
> Models like ornith:9b, mistral:7b or cogito:14b can get the job done sometimes, but they are not fast and reliable enough for general use, specially if you have only 4GB of VRAM. Have you considered/tried using a model that's
23.
by kouteiheika 23d ago
FWIW I had the same reaction to the popups. Immediately closed the tab.
24.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> This is a real problem, and it’s not just in markdown files and docs. Claude loves to write things we’ve “discovered” in comments and then later in treats the comments as gospel truth. There's a simple fix for this: do not let it
25.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> In my company we use graphite and stacked PRs so it is highly encouraged to keep one commit per PR, so I am constantly ammending my commits. So this makes it even simpler for you. Then you don't have to care at all about keeping y
26.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> The problem with sandboxing is that the regular dev env (massive IDE:s, cloned megarepos, installed dependencies and so on) just won't sandbox very easily. It's not that hard, actually. You don't need VMs. You usually do
27.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> yeah, but if you don't want to lose your existing context sometimes you have to Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. What do you mean by "lose your existing context"? Can't you just... commit in turns? It's not l
28.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> I made changes to my dependency lists in the same code where Claude ran npm update. ...but was it in the same commit? Two "update lockfile" commits, one yours and one Claude's should have made this obvious, no? Here&#x27
29.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
> No one is going around checking every single line change in auto-generated files. There's a simple fix for your particular case: commit your lock fine (which you should do) and always review the diff (which you should also do). (:
30.
by kouteiheika 26d ago
Did you actually try to convince them? Again, this requirement is incredibly silly. Here, look at this (it's a link to AA; I shortened it since the link's huge): https://tinyurl.com/2dhzdrt6 Right now, the best US

More ›