10 ms·
> This isn't just compliance theater; it's a straight‑up national economic security play. The woes of LLM contrasts… In all seriousness, the points made ring
by kioku 8mo ago
> This isn't just compliance theater; it's a straight‑up national economic security play.
The woes of LLM contrasts…
In all seriousness, the points made ring true not only for European companies and should make everyone consider the implications of the current situation, as dreary as they are.
- paradox460 8mo agoIt's not just big, it's large
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- eiiot 8mo agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pr8xnNi7OM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pr8xnNi7OM
- hintymad 8mo agoYeah, human brain is amazing. After I reading many AI replies, this kind style just stands out, even though I can't precisely describe it.
- MagicMoonlight 8mo agoWe’re the blade runners of this generation, spotting the replicants in the posts.
- tarsinge 8mo agoTo me it is simply good writing, the kind that is found in literature, but feels a bit out of place in discussions on the internet. What makes it stand out is that real English speaker on the internet are way more casual in their writing. I’ve also noticed that non native English speaker are sometimes mistaken for LLMs due to these less casual sentences structure.
- tvshtr 8mo agoYup, exactly. As a non-native speaker, I phrase things a little differently. Also, I’m used to using em dashes (from academia), but now that's considered an AI tell. Shit's dumb.
- DANmode 8mo ago“This isn’t x, it’s y.” Described it pretty well|succinctly the last time I saw it being referenced.
- charmchi 8mo agoSame with: > The kicker? Fully 61 percent of European CIOs and tech leaders say...
- nixpulvis 8mo agoJust as America would like to reduce its dependence on external production, so to do other countries want to reduce their own. We used to live in a world converging toward maximal international trade, when in fact it was exploiting underdeveloped nations. As we progress globally, and as the development gap shrinks, we have noticed power dynamics which weren't well guarded against in the old way. So now what? How do we preserve a lot of the efficiencies of the past, while strengthening the resilience and redundancy. How can multiple nations create policy which drives business on partially compatible protocols? If I allow myself to be optimistic, I'd be hoping for more international lawyers and trade agreements. Protectionism is natural, but taken too far, isolationism is a death sentence.
- isk517 8mo agoEven without national protectionism we are still experiencing isolationism, expect instead of it being done by nations in the interest of their citizens it is being done by corporations in the interest of their shareholders and it's leading to a dangerous amount of centralization as well. Compatibility protocols are probably the best answer, allow individual countries to develop software they trust to interact with internationally accepted protocols and formats. As you said, good luck getting anyone to agree to anything. If email didn't already exist I don't think it would even be possible to implement today.
- michaelt 8mo ago> Just as America would like to reduce its dependence on external production, so to do other countries want to reduce their own. If anything, I'd say for other countries it's more urgent. If China embargoes deliveries of light bulbs to Europe, all the light bulbs already in place keep working. The pain would grow over time - giving a grace period, to ramp up local production. If America embargoes AWS, Google, Apple and Microsoft? The pain would be instant and severe.
- hilbert42 8mo agoIn case of war AWS, Google, Apple and Microsoft and others would be immediately directed by government to adopt its war strategy—like it or not—just as US manufacturing was forced to retool for war production during WWII.
- miohtama 8mo agoRussian and China are already getting rid of Microsoft.
- UltraSane 8mo agoAWS in China doesn't have KMS
- myroon5 8mo agohttps://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/06/aws-kms-now-available-aws-china-beijing-sinnet-and-aws-china-ningxia-nwcd/ https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/06/aws-kms-n... https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/about-aws/regional-product-services/ https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/about-aws/regional-product-servi...
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- UltraSane 8mo agoThat isn't the same KMS that everyone else uses. It is approved by the CCP so has a backdoor.
- locknitpicker 8mo ago> Russian and China are already getting rid of Microsoft. I don't know what you mean by China "getting rid of Microsoft" in the context of cloud providers. I mean, Azure is already present in China's internet, and just like any cloud provider present in China it's presence is a partnership with local cloud providers. Russia is getting rid of Microsoft not because it has a choice. They are subjected to sanctions due to their invasion of Ukraine, and that essentially cut their access to all tech services. By that measuring stick, Russia is also getting rid of Boeing and Airbus.
- ivan_gammel 8mo agoThe most interesting part is that they do not rely on Western software solutions (Russia still needs hardware, China may reach full autonomy soon enough). If they could do it relatively quickly, EU can do it too. And EU now has exactly the same incentives.