isodev

2 ms·

1.
by isodev 6d ago
Applies to every living thing with a limbic system. So yes, that steak or chicken nuggets...
2.
by isodev 8d ago
And when did Apple decide to grace us with tools to support the Duo? Yeah, 3 hours ago. This should've been out in June so they can also get the feedback about all the silly design choices the Duo brings (and the bugs in that simulator
3.
by isodev 8d ago
What is your point? That they eventually released something? The simulator came out today... on Friday afternoon lol
4.
by isodev 8d ago
It really feels quite irrelevant. Also, the amount of work to support this with zero support from Apple since WWDC is just absurd. And even if one does the work, Apple will just sherlock the cool features into their apps.
5.
by isodev 8d ago
Imagine, even Apple is moving itself to the shitlist.
6.
by isodev 9d ago
Well the process has to start somewhere right? In politics (as in real life) words matter and what is being said today in these statements are the general outlines of how this relationship is going to move forward.
7.
by isodev 9d ago
Good. The EU is an economic and political union so facilitating trade and movement between political allies seems only natural.
8.
by isodev 11d ago
I'm very happy Siri AI is not available here so there is practically nothing big and flashy changing. It's like getting a iOS 26 Service Pack 1 :)
9.
by isodev 11d ago
The question is if Apple fixed that and I don't think they have.
10.
by isodev 12d ago
How do you know? Also given that PCC is just marketing speak for "Apple pinky promise they don't read or share the data", it would be nice to get an API with first class access to my own data. So tired of being locked it.
11.
by isodev 12d ago
Nice, thanks EU for forcing Apple. I guess it was possible all along.
12.
by isodev 13d ago
> they can strike an agreement in private That's what we call a cartel. Like Apple and Google.
13.
by isodev 14d ago
> The majority of the problem is also simply the ability to record. Exactly, and recent announcements like Apple normalising always on recording, even wrapped in “big promises” on privacy, deserve a lot more attention and strong regulati
14.
by isodev 14d ago
Or Space Karen can fix his space junk... Maybe even start paying for the toxic waste he is landing when his junk continuously fails to stay up and re-enters the atmosphere.
15.
by isodev 20d ago
Bigger corporations mitigate the problem by feeding content (that they don't own but happen to have) to training models. It's a version of "faire use" where << if you manage to find it, it's yours >> min
16.
by isodev 21d ago
Hey Peter, that's a very cool idea. I think (digital) sovereignty doesn't just happen, it's something we need to build and that's how we do it. It's a bit like "local first". Looking forward to using it on
17.
by isodev 21d ago
Yes, it does generate the certificate
18.
by isodev 21d ago
For less than a cup of coffee yeah.
19.
by isodev 23d ago
You're right to push back. This is bending the leaf on both ends... just my honest take.
20.
by isodev 25d ago
I love the concept but (at least on mobile Safari) most of it feels unusable.
21.
by isodev 25d ago
> blame whoever decided it was a great idea to pay executives in stock/stock options Yes, I do agree that extreme forms of capitalism are responsible for ruining practically every aspect of modern tech. > Apple ran so hard on pri
22.
by isodev 25d ago
> he sold out his customers I think it's important to remind ourselves that the responsibility doesn't lie with the one individual. Even the visit to the WH dinner - it is the company, Apple, via various structures committed to
23.
by isodev 28d ago
How do you mean? If AI disappeared today, not much would change about my work. I make software.
24.
by isodev 28d ago
No, it doesn't. That there are different words for it should be a hint it's different things.
25.
by isodev 1mo ago
It's kind of shocking that nowhere in the discussions we see references to the IDSA ( https://internationaldataspaces.org/ ). Most of ATproto seems to be based on data space concepts with a strange level of "we don&
26.
by isodev 1mo ago
Because prices? Have you seen how much Apple products cost these days? Also, M1/M2 are perfectly fine and capable hardware. It's hard to justify the upgrade outside some artificial constraints Apple would bring in with a macOS upd
27.
by isodev 1mo ago
It's really more about stakes. A human taking notes (and being familiar with the protocols) will of course pay attention to elements with significant or critical consequences. AIs are just text generators, they don't have a notion
28.
by isodev 1mo ago
I don't know, we've been the tiny hamsters in the biggest A/B test ever, I'm possibly very tired of the token/limits game. This is clearly not how this can be monetised (if that's even possible)
29.
by isodev 1mo ago
if only there was some kind of app review process... but Apple doesn't care. I guess the Bluesky bros got inspired by Threads, again.
30.
by isodev 1mo ago
Ah yes, slavery

More ›