8 ms·
Libre – An anonymous social experiment without likes, followers, or ads
- luizsantana 1y agoThis is actually really good
- rododecba 1y agoI recently launched Libre , a small side project and social experiment. It’s not a social network, but kind of the opposite: No profiles, usernames, or followers No likes, trending topics, or algorithms No ads, no data collection Just anonymous thoughts from people around the world. Curious to see how it evolves and what kind of conversations happen when metrics are removed.
- roscas 1y agoTo be anonymous you cannot use gstatic.com because this way you're just telling google I was there. Also tailwindcss and unpkg call sell data to others and there you go zero anonimous. I'm sure you can fix this.
- colesantiago 1y agoYou might as well not use the web / internet at this point. Unless you use busybox or an esoteric OS to browse the web, almost every browser or OS (macOS, Linux, Windows) will ping to Google or some other bad spyware website.
- sebastiennight 1y agoFYI this statement is wrong. You don't need an "esoteric OS". Just a firewall (such as Little Snitch on MacOS) and one of several browsers (such as Firefox) will enable you to browse the web without constantly calling home to Google.
- colesantiago 1y agoFirefox is funded by Google. By using it, Google is still benefiting from it, use a different browser. Google is known for trying an assortment of IPs and DNS addresses to get around blockers such as Little Snitch on popular software. But that isn't enough to get around Google's tracking hence you would need an esoteric OS.
- sebastiennight 1y ago> Firefox is funded by Google. By using it, Google is still benefiting from it, use a different browser. 1. You're moving the goalposts here. We were talking about avoiding tracking/pinging Google 2. Google pays Firefox to be the default search engine. If you change the search engine, how are you benefitting Google? They're paying for eyeballs that you're not providing, so you're technically making them spend money in vain. > Google is known for trying an assortment of IPs and DNS addresses to get around blockers such as Little Snitch on popular software. If we assumed that this was true, I don't see how switching out the OS makes any difference to the tactic of Google "trying an assortment of IPs and DNS addresses" from a 3rd-party website, which is where this conversation started.
- colesantiago 1y ago> If we assumed that this was true, I don't see how switching out the OS makes any difference... Because we want absolutely zero Google tracking here and an esoteric OS has zero Google tracking. Not in source code not in network requests, zero. No amount of "Little Snitch" will help you here.
- sebastiennight 1y agoI'm not even sure you're being serious here, but I'll assume good faith. What Google tracking is there in, for instance, vanilla MacOS? I have my traffic logs, so please let me know and I'll check it for myself. Edit: and please don't say "Safari has Google as the default engine", since we've covered that above. What else is there?
- Hoodedcrow 1y agoThankfully, Ublock Origin in advanced mod can block those requests by default. It's just very irritating and I'd say disrespectful when you HAVE to unblock them for the site to work.
- rododecba 1y agoi dont know any other way to show where the msg was sent if not
- dragonwriter 1y ago"I don't know how to do this while maintaining anonymity" is not an excuse to do it in a way which does not maintain anonymity while claiming it does.
- ranger_danger 1y ago> Curious to see how it evolves being a haven for sharing very illegal content is probably how it's going to evolve... unfortunately
- PaulHoule 1y agoSome kind of trouble one way or the other.
- gsf_emergency_2 1y agoStrong link trouble or weak link trouble :)? In any case.. I hope TW Körner doesn't have that last footnote on the topic.. (Fwiw left/right (meta-)division seems to me to encompass all the moral taxonomies of the day, TWK just happened to settle for rich/smart vs social wrt UK) >Social Darwinism applies the Darwinian doctrine of survival of the fittest to human society. Rich social Darwinists take wealth as the best indication of fitness to survive, academic social Darwinists take intellectual achievements as the best indication and so on. They are often haunted by the fear that the unfit do not understand this and may outbreed the fit. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24154247 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24154247
- PaulHoule 1y agoGod that guy might turn up close to me by an embedding search.
- gsf_emergency_2 1y ago;) (For some reason the algolia DB wasn't properly normalised)
- rododecba 1y agohopefuly not, thank you
- 1y ago
- riidom 1y agoCould you look into your dark mode please? Thank you!:)
- ranger_danger 1y agoI highly suggest the Dark Reader extension.
- textadventure 1y agoAs some who loves dark mode, I hate that extension. I get the appeal of forcing every website to be dark mode, but that ends up breaking half of them or just making them look like trash. People need to custom design their dark modes for whatever each design is. If you don't care about breaking design and stuff looking the way its supposed to, I guess the extension is fine but I rather use something like Stylus where you can use people's custom designed stylesheets for most known sites.
- ranger_danger 1y agoI love it and I've never had a problem with it... I don't get the hate at all /shrug
- riidom 1y agoI have Dark Reader. I think it wasn't working properly for me. Right now the site is 404, can't check. But I agree with other commentors, Dark Reader isn't the solution. There is not really an excuse for not doing a builtin darkmode nowadays, imo.
- krapp 1y ago>Curious to see how it evolves and what kind of conversations happen when metrics are removed. I've seen a ton of projects like this. It will get deluged with spam and shitposts and people will stop caring once the novelty wears off and leave once it becomes a cesspool. Probably for 4chan which at least has a culture and established userbase. And porn.
- jibal 1y agoNo value--people want content that is focused, accurate, curated, reliable, relevant, high quality, etc. Also no freedom, with all your content restrictions.
- petralithic 1y agoTo the first point, could there not be an algorithm that nevertheless still works without followers, likes or ads? TikTok seems kind of similar, at least when it initially started. It seems its core algorithm doesn't need likes, it can detect whether you engage with a video via other metrics like time spent watching the video. I suppose you'd want to allow people to self select based on topics, and then, well, you essentially get Reddit.
- atoav 1y agoAh the good old "freedom to" that totally forgets that freedom also should contain a "freedom of". Free like in a chaotic war zone, where you can commit any kind of horrible attrocity, but if you just want to have a nice time, that isn't an option, because everybody behaves like an idiot. No thanks. Freedom in reality isn't just a thing that you increase by reducing the rules. There comes a point where less rules result in less freedom. So it is always a balancing act between your freedom to do X and others freedom to not have to be subjected to X. Example: Giving up the freedom being able to murder random people is a little price to pay, if it means reducing the risk to be murdered yourself – especially since decent people wouldn't have the actionable urge to murder each other anyways. If you're a murderer however that may reduce your freedom in ways you dislike. But then, maybe, your freedom shouldn't matter as much. Maybe I would care more about that specific idea of active freedom if I routinely wittnessed a real repression of any idea that isn't just the mean bullshit of egocentrics who have lost all touch with humanity and just want to see the world burn.
- jibal 1y agoI didn't say that I wanted a "freedom to" site, I'm just saying that the site is mischaracterized.
- mattigames 1y agoNo way to filter by subjects one may be interested, no way to find likeminded individuals, no way to mute people, so yeah, not much value could be derived from it; I think that there is space for some pseudo-anonymous social network but this is not it, at least not in its current state.
- politelemon 1y agoThe first message is from July 2022. Is it really recent?
- rododecba 1y agoi launched it 1 month ago aprox
- jandrese 1y agoSo you launched /b/?
- guerrilla 1y agoThis is what I thought too. It'll go full Nazi in less than 5 hours from now. Anyone want to place bets?
- Xevion 1y agoHaha, have you checked on it lately? You had it right on the money dude. The thing allowed HTML injection. It went from the N word and a couple emojis to downright ear-piercing multitudes of fascist /b/ propaganda over the course of an hour.
- guerrilla 1y agoAnd now it's completely broken this morning...
- cxr 1y agoWhat are algorithms?
- neilv 1y ago> No ads, no data collection [...] Just anonymous thoughts from [...] It currently leaks cross-site user tracking information to Google (www.gstatic.com).
- listic 1y agoThere's no way of ever hearing back; being responded to, right?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 48terry 1y agoYour site about "pure freedom of expression" and "raw thoughts" stops me from posting about buying new golf balls because of a badwords.js word filter. Why are your Terms of Service and Privacy Policy a collection of empty bullet points?
- rkomorn 1y agoHow can you comment this without including the post content that triggered the filter?
- 48terry 1y agoLiterally just try it: "golf balls". The badwords.js isn't even particularly hidden if you check the page's source: https://libreantisocial.com/badwords.js https://libreantisocial.com/badwords.js
- rkomorn 1y agoI... did not think you were being quite so literal.
- rkomorn 1y agoI'll add that, based on the other posts I saw on the site, it certainly didn't occur to me that there was any filtering in place.
- 48terry 1y agoWell, badwords.js is client side, so if you just block it from loading you can post about balls and butts and slurs as much as you like. Absolutely incredible stuff.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- heavensteeth 1y agoDid you vibe code this by any chance? It's clearly insecure. Oh, yes, you did: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44656840 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44656840
- logicprog 1y agoI like this a lot.
- kenjackson 1y agoI feel like this kind of how Twitter started. Just text messages to the world. But it’s hard to resist monetization and network effects.
- ceroxylon 1y agoInteresting, but after my initial impressions I predict the results of the experiment will be "this is why we can't have nice things"
- delusional 1y agoThe first post in my feed was "Kill all Jews" I feel like we're already there.
- tombert 1y agoI feel like this experiment has already kind of been run with 4chan and 8kun, which are sort of famous for their awfulness.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- baubino 1y agoYep. Just took a look and the top post is just someone writing the n-word over and over.
- nativeit 1y agoThat's incredible. Within the first 5 posts we've got "Javascript is overrated", "tabs are better than spaces", something about trains/public transit, and a link to a hentai site. Talk about speed-running social media.
- giancarlostoro 1y agoI got racial slurs and weird audio spam.
- mediumsmart 1y agoConfirmed but the css is off so it’s kind of unreadable on this phone Edit. It works now, scrolling through the second character dump presumably posted to bury a bad review?
- whatevertrevor 1y agoIt's full of the n-word right now. I'm really not surprised.
- wsintra2022 1y agoUI seems a little jank on iPhone SE, other than that, cool project. Q. How do you prevent racism, spam and hate speech?
- xyst 1y agoA: you don’t All of us humans are fundamentally racist, spammy, and have some form of hate in us. Depending on the state of society, it can suppress or bring it out. Anonymous boards like this bring out the worst in all of us. Just as the current administration has catered to our bigoted, racist selves. Anonymous boards have more or less the same effect.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- popcar2 1y agoI've always liked the idea of being able to just post anonymously without any votes, but it always quickly devolves into incoherent spam and endless slurs. The website has been active for an hour and I'm already seeing some of that. It always turns into 4chan.
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoI mean yeah it would turn into 4chan since 4chan is also a anonymous board similar to this... But what's wild is that when you say it always turns into 4chan, everyone knows that it means something bad, something bs. the fact that 4chan has such a bad reputation is absolutely valid though, there is no denying of it, and maybe these other experiments also prove it that such reputation maybe exists because of the reason that the underlying system is flawed regarding anonymity, but that's just my hunch. I like anonymity as an ideal, but 4chan (anonymity irl) not so much...
- rafram 1y agoThis is kind of the same idea as Yik Yak, which was an interesting app. Some good aspects (authenticity) and some bad aspects (lots of bomb threats and bullying).
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- arlen_ 1y agoThis reminds me of the early internet.
- jibal 1y agoAs a developer on the ARPANET I've been on the net since the moment it existed. This is the arch opposite of the early internet, which was dominated by intelligent academics sharing technical articles and dense information.
- wslh 1y agoI like the project, but the words "Libre" and "experiment" made me assume it would be open source. Of course, it's the owner's decision, but the title biased my expectation.
- sunamic 1y agoThis is very similar to an app I launched a while ago. Anonymity leads to some "interesting" posts. https://speczo.dev/hoot https://speczo.dev/hoot
- noeclement 1y agoThe "Import ID" feature doesn't seem to work. I keep getting this error: "The identifier is not valid."
- Barbing 1y agoReported racism, showed “Reporting…”, got: “Could not send the report. Please try again.”
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoWhy do you feel the need to report it? Is it a direct threat to someone? Is it illegal -or- do you just not like it and want it to go away? It seems pretty clear to me no one that cares is on the other end of this.
- Barbing 1y agoIt was very rude, and wasn’t punching up. Rude can be fine especially with a delineated purpose. It was like “look behind you - the [racist trope] is the fault of the [ethnic group]”, and nothing political. Racism is permitted there it sounds like, then? Wouldn’t have reported it if I’d known. Assumed taking swipes at minorities wouldn’t be tolerable outside of 4chan. I can always not visit when I don’t want to. But maybe I got the wrong impression, that someone decent was running the place and wouldn’t want garbage strewn about their halls. Course they might aim towards a different concept if so!
- jibal 1y agoWhen I tried to post a comment saying what I thought of the idea of this site, it told me that my words were "prohibited". So much for freedom.
- tchalla 1y agoPost the comment you wanted to make here.
- gweinberg 1y agoWell, one of the first posts I saw was just a repeated ethnic slur, so not all "bad words" are prohibited.
- jibal 1y agoI didn't say they are ... just some set of words that the creator doesn't personally approve of.
- tchalla 1y agoAnd what are those words? Post them here.
- jibal 1y agoI don't have the list of word that are forbidden, only the creator does, so ask him.
- tchalla 1y agoI asked you to post the word that you were not allowed to post, not a list of words that are forbidden on the site. For some reason, you don't want to post your comment or the words here.
- jibal 1y ago"not all "bad words" are prohibited" "I didn't say they are ... just some set of words that the creator doesn't personally approve of." "And what are those words? Post them here." "I don't have the list of word that are forbidden, only the creator does, so ask him." You say "I asked you to post the word that you were not allowed to post, not a list of words that are forbidden on the site" but that is mistaken ... see the above context. "For some reason, you don't want to post your comment or the words here." I do have reasons not to accede to your demands, and I won't respond further to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
- xyst 1y agoGood ole anonymous boards. Nothing else like them brings out the worst in humanity
- mempko 1y agoBiggest issue is reporting posts is broken
- chasing 1y agoThe problem with openness and anonymity is that it invites bad actors. Social media is an unsolved problem and any platform that gets sufficiently large will be more valuable as a tool to disseminate misinformation and propaganda than as a tool for people to actually communate freely and openly.
- _Algernon_ 1y agoWith none of those features there is no excuse for the site working that terribly with JS disabled. Look at HN for comparison, which degrades gracefully with JS disabled.
- buynlarge 1y agoI always thought there was a space for a social media that has upvotes and followers and all that, with the intention of creating echo chambers and segregating users into their own groups and that sort of thing, but with the ability for anyone to go on a 'holiday' into the other echo chambers, to see what those other users experience. Likes are not one dimensional. Likes flow from one person to another. If you like someones posts, you're more likely to enjoy the things they like. A network of endorsement emerges and the subgroups can become clear.
- NoMoreNicksLeft 1y agoThe important thing would be for moderators to be able to police "what is liked/disliked". Hear me out. If you've got this space where dozens or hundreds of people all have a high overlap of favorable content, but there's this one turd who comes in and downvotes everything, always... he's not just a little different, and he's not assimilating. He's trying to sabotage. If this was visible to a moderator, that moderator could decide he doesn't belong to the group. I don't advocate that he no longer be able to view the content, but maybe his votes just stop counting. Maybe he's no longer able to post content of his own (would be up to the moderator, I think, perhaps his content was always good enough, but his voting is counterproductive). I think that on places like reddit they avoided this functionality because it would give moderators too much control over their communities, and outsiders would be unable to come in and eventually take over and force the original group out. Being admins, they could of course have done this anyway, but it would require them to be heavy-handed and obvious.
- buynlarge 1y agoI think, if you have a saboteur, they're probably not part of your 'network'. The people you've endorsed probably won't have endorsed the saboteur, so the saboteurs activity should not effect your feed in any meaningful way. This is how trust works in real social circles. Moderators clearly work but it's a shame it relies on single people doing a good thing. It's a shame the moderation can't be done by everyone all the time, unconsciously.
- CyMonk 1y ago
- barbazoo 1y ago> There are no 'likes', no followers, no algorithms here. There is only the freedom to express yourself with radical anonymity and connect purely. > Start being FREE Love the concept, let’s go one step further. No publishing at all. Only you can see what you wrote. No need to connect to anything, even if it’s “pure”.
- jibal 1y agoIndeed. I'm already free to express myself with radical anonymity. Am I now free due to that site to do so and have it reach the people I want it to reach? No, not at all.
- doublerabbit 1y agoFor a stress-test, your doing pretty well.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- ivape 1y agoYou are describing a standard message board. Old things are new again I suppose.
- Igrom 1y agoThat's exactly it. I would say that the experiment is not so novel, but non-novel experiments are good, too. We retread illuminating experiments from physics in school for good reason. There are quite a lot of message boards and imageboards, large and small, which check the same boxes. Many of them have not gotten enough traction to catch the attention of the mainstream (e.g. lainchan), and have a distinct vibe. I think that as soon as your userbase expands into a representative sample of the Internet user population, your platform's culture will become increasingly similar (i.e. "average out") to the largest platforms, e.g. 4chan.
- schrodinger 1y agoI've always thought that a problem with sites like Reddit and Hacker News is that a very small percentage of users engage with "new"; most people only see the posts that have been curated by that small minority which creates _some_ sort of bias (arguably, a positive one). I've wanted to try something like a Hacker News where your homepage shows a random smattering of posts where the probability you'll see any particular one depends on its number of likes. In other words, rather than having a firehose of "new" posts from which a few are elevated to the home page (masses), give everyone a dynamic home page which is mostly items that have been liked by many, but includes a mix of some that haven't made that threshold yet. Maybe instead of pure likes it could be a ratio of likes to views. But the point is some way to engage everyone in the selection of what makes the homepage. It could even be as simple as "keep HN as is, but include 5 posts randomly chosen from recent submissions and tag them as such." Dang, has anything like this been considered?
- schrodinger 1y agoActually, isn't this a bit like TikTok and why it allows low-follower profiles to rise to the top on occasion?
- lossolo 1y agoYes, TikTok uses similar algorithm to push new content, that's why anyone can go viral there.
- sixtyj 1y agoRandomness is an underdog. Serious question is how often would you tolerate if those randomly displayed posts are absolutely out of your interests? Would you click or skip? Plenty of fish (Canadian-based dating site), programmed by Markus Frind, had a function: during onboarding you could choose types of people you think you prefer (e.g. brunette/blond etc.) and if you haven’t clicked later on them, algo had started to show different results…
- schrodinger 1y agoInteresting anecdote on Plenty of Fish. It’s definitely interesting how people aren’t really good at telling you what they like; empirical evidence is far better. I believe Paul Graham has an essay on a similar topic where if you ask people if they like an idea you have for a product, they are likely to say yes even if they wouldn’t actually use it. But if you ask them how much they would pay for access, or if they’d pay a certain amount, you’d get a more accurate response. FWIW, I wasn’t suggesting pure randomness though, it’s more like probabilistic randomness. Rather than a binary threshold a post must pass to make the homepage that divides the community into curators and consumers, this would show you posts with a degree of randomness with a probability proportional to the likes it’s garnered. Btw, I’m not sure what you meant by randomness is an underdog? Are you implying it’s a nice goal but it rarely works out in practice, perhaps because people actually do fall into natural curator / consumer buckets?
- busymom0 1y agoWhy call it "Libre" though? Or am I missing the link to code?
- asim 1y agoEvery attempt at anonymous social fails terribly. Unfortunately without good moderation tooling this doesn't work. You have to limit the blast radius of what people put out there because on the internet, without repercussions, a lot of people say terrible things. After having tried a few things like this, it's clear identity matters. Yes you can find clever ways to get around it and surface the best content or have pseudonyms and all that, but essentially you must verify individuals. People need to know you can't just say anything aka you can't say terrible hurtful things without repercussions. You need a unique identifier per browser, per device, etc, and then you permaban anyone who uses vulgar language, racial slurs, or anything of the sort immediately. You use AI before the fact to actually moderate and check things, and anything that is attempted gets a warning. Someone else said, let's go a step further and not post at all. You know what, YES. We have X, we have Facebook, we have many tools where you can create an account with any random email address, with any random name, and say anything you want. Let's leave behind the two decades of public social and go back to the real world e.g maybe there's a world in which you own what you say, its there forever and you have to be thoughtful before you say it, but we also put it in an appropriate place, in a category of communication that makes sense. Blogging was way better than microblogging, but obviously opening the door to everyone made social media far more viral and addictive. Adding pictures and video made it even more viral and addictive. It would just be nice to go back to something a bit more real, something that's not going to be horribly abused and it feels like part of that might mean, less public social.
- throwaway19340 1y ago> You have to limit the blast radius of what people put out there because on the internet, without repercussions, a lot of people say terrible things And yet those same repercussions are the reason why social media is full of inoffensive slop. No one wants be the one who get fired for leaking their employer's unethical practices, after all. Pseudonymity is not enough, sadly. Given enough time, you'll leak enough data points to be identified. > Let's leave behind the two decades of public social and go back to the real world The idea that the "internet" and the "real world" are separate has been outdated for a long time.
- bdangubic 1y agoI liked this post :)
- throwawaybob420 1y agoNow this is some peak ai vibe coded slop
- neuralkoi 1y agoSadists and psychopaths seem to have taken over this experiment.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoYou sure that call wasn’t always coming from inside the house? Perhaps the more fake and curated the internet becomes, the more people will act out when given the chance?
- wetpaws 1y ago[dead]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- insamniac 1y agoDon't know how long it took, but we made it to Nazi videos pretty quick.
- bopbopbop7 1y agoLooks like you do only frontend validation and have XSS vulnerabilities all over the place. I also see aren’t taking down nazi posts and CP? I went ahead and reported you to the FBI, hopefully your vibe lawyer is good.
- h4t 1y agoThis got hacked pretty fast.
- deanebarker 1y agoYeah, when I visited, it was utterly destroyed with racist ranting and (I think) some neo-Nazi. Horrifying, yet impressive.
- riffic 1y agono goatse? I'm saddened.
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoexactly my thoughts too
- camdroidw 1y ago[dead]
- riffic 1y agoit's kind of a shock site right now. don't do experiments in the future without considering the avenues for abuse.
- OuterVale 1y agoI loaded it up to find myself presented with a completely broken visual appearance, screaming audio, and all sorts of hate content and other horrors. Absolutely terrible.
- riffic 1y agoorange site on a saturday night.
- Banditoz 1y agoNo HTML sanitization?
- disqard 1y agoThis looks like a different take on 4chan, and the content resembles the scrawls on the bathroom wall of a pub.
- acjohnson55 1y agoI already saw racial slurs on the first page, and it looks like people are able to post arbitrary HTML, so I'd say the experiment needs a lot of work.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoI would say it’s a great success… the debate is now what was the experiment?
- Jimmc414 1y agoHas the site been hacked or is this how it is supposed to look? Usually racial slurs are buried deeper than the landing page.
- giancarlostoro 1y agoTrolls likely injecting HTML.
- Xevion 1y agoThe whole thing uses Firebase (as all vibe coded garbage does), and the 'country' property inline displays HTML without any kind of validation, meaning you can insert script tags, images, or more excitingly: autoplaying videos. There's tons of swastikas and fascist imagery that plays 10 of the same video all at the same time. It's really cringe, who has the time to make these videos in the first place? Looks like something nuked through the rate limit though, because when I try to post anything, it says I'm rate limited by Firebase or whatever in the console.
- giancarlostoro 1y ago> who has the time to make these videos in the first place? Lets just say 4chan has a lot more, unfortunately.
- j3s 1y agowhat could go wrong? (frontpage is already filled with /pol/ trash)
- ameletgrey 1y ago[dead]
- brumar 1y ago1 day later: it's a total mess.
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoOh buddy, being hacked is absolutely crazy tbh. to me it now feels whether it was adequately prepared/ maybe was vibe coded?
- BrouteMinou 1y agoVibe coding at its best. Did you expect something different from this "experiment"? I am curious to know what was your thought process for this.
- hackrmn 1y agoWell, it only took about 15 hours for the site to be discovered by the Internet Troll Federation and be absolutely stuffed with slurs and hate memes. Which was to be expected, frankly. Not sure at which point the site allowed HTML, but for the first couple of hours or so there was only text for thoughts there, then the "hypermedia" of the kind described above, appeared, rendering the site useless. Just wait until someone discovers even better means to weaponize the HTML post feature -- there's bound to be galore of client-side vulnerabilities, I expect, if only due to Unicode possibilities...
- hntwaifu 1y agoIt's fascinating to see how quickly they can devolve into chaos while anonymous platforms can foster raw creativity. Some form of moderation or community guidelines is essential for meaningful engagement. https://hentaidiffusion.art/ https://hentaidiffusion.art/ different kind of unfiltered creativity.