Banditoz

4 ms·

1.
by Banditoz 8d ago
GitHub shows 44 contributors. 41 distinct users have merged pull requests. ...so now their work has been reduced to nothing?
2.
by Banditoz 12d ago
Is engaging with the site just reading its content, not liking or retweeting? Sometimes I just want to read a tweet thread that was sent to me without ditractions in a straightforward UI.
3.
by Banditoz 17d ago
You're building a weak strawman here. The author didn't call you nor your son out specifically.
4.
by Banditoz 17d ago
How do these repos always have so many stars and forks? Roughly 1,800 forks, but only 40ish unique authors? Almost 30,000 stars? Something fishy is going on...
5.
by Banditoz 19d ago
Don't they just use Macs at Microsoft?
6.
by Banditoz 21d ago
Oh dear, why does this website override scrolling behavior?
7.
by Banditoz 22d ago
Are your taxes complicated such that you feel the need to have an LLM do them for you?
8.
by Banditoz 24d ago
I await your repo tomorrow, then! I'd be happy to use an alternative with all backfilled playercount data and sales history that hasn't been sold out.
9.
by Banditoz 24d ago
Eh, once it's set up the maintenance cost is minimal. Cron'd backups and such and you won't have to worry.
10.
by Banditoz 26d ago
It's crazy these things don't have much interopability with third parties. Is it so difficult to expose a MQTT thing or some other random HTTP server, default off but configurable in some developer settings, that could be used to
11.
by Banditoz 29d ago
Not the same thing.
12.
by Banditoz 29d ago
Recently the physical cards are sold at a machine inside Haneda airport.
13.
by Banditoz 1mo ago
I disagree. Nitter's big pull was lightweight SSR, this site is not that. Nitter also actually _looks like_ Twitter more than this site!
14.
by Banditoz 1mo ago
What makes you say that?
15.
Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices(github.com)
1214 points by Banditoz 1mo ago|1352 comments
16.
by Banditoz 1mo ago
A lot of instances are showing rate limited too.
17.
by Banditoz 1mo ago
I think you're conflating two different things here. I am not aware of any DB optimization articles that say "trust me bro, throw your data, don't build indices, it'll Just Work™!"
18.
by Banditoz 1mo ago
Just because a Github issue doesn't have activity doesn't mean it's not an issue anymore.
19.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
Moore's Law covers transistors, not LLMs.
20.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
I don't know, why are you? Who's to say Anthropic wasn't already modifying output in some way for optimization or some other reason? These models are incredibly opaque.
21.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
Doesn't mean Twitter should've followed suit.
22.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
How does that help anything?
23.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
Is something you disagree with a "Reddit-tier take"?
24.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
Seems to be more level skepticism to me. Not "blind hate".
25.
by Banditoz 2mo ago
I wish I knew. The article is difficult to read due to the heavy use of LLM prose.
26.
by Banditoz 3mo ago
The page uses 10% of my CPU while doing nothing on it.
27.
by Banditoz 3mo ago
You are welcome to continue to read these LLM-generated writings without questioning their content.
28.
by Banditoz 3mo ago
What's the current OLED recommendation today?
29.
by Banditoz 3mo ago
What is git not suited for in modern development? I haven't found any reasons.
30.
by Banditoz 3mo ago
Dude, it's a web request. It's not that deep.

More ›