14 ms·
Meta announces Oakley smart glasses
Official announcement: https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/oakley-meta-ai-glasses-sports-wearables-hstn/ https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/oakley-meta-ai-glasses-sport...
- garbawarb 1y agoLooks cool but I just hate the heaviness and feel of wearing acetate. If they ever make titanium smartglasses I'll be all over them.
- kube-system 1y agoTitanium is about 3-4x the density, they're normally light only because less material can be used... which is probably problematic when used as an enclosure for electronics.
- syntaxing 1y agoTitanium for electronics isn’t much of a problem (look at Apple Watch and a bunch of Apple product). The issue is that it’s a considerably more expensive material (every cents count when you scale to consumer electronics) and a bit harder to work with.
- woleium 1y agoThe material is not the majority of the expense. The cost comes from the difficulty encountered when working the metal using standard tooling. It is difficult to work, low tolerance and high failure rates made it impractical prior to modern (very expensive) machines.
- kube-system 1y agoWe were talking about weight -- you don't hang those devices on your face. Titanium glasses are lightweight because a very minimal amount of material is used. This is possible for regular glasses because you can make them with a ~1mm cross-section. When you want to put electronics inside of them, you need much more material.
- diggan 1y agoAlthough parent asking for titanium for the feeling, so maybe something in-between would be fine? Lightweight material inside and structurally, but titanium or something else as the "skin".
- saltcured 1y agoLike a surfboard, or a toucan's beak. I assume the poster above imagined the something inside could just be voids, like a tiny aircraft. But yes, some kind of low density filler could also add some stability in areas you don't want mass metal but also don't have electronics or battery "cargo".
- kube-system 1y agoI don't think a titanium coating over something else is going to deliver that. I think the reason titanium glasses feel nice is primarily because they have minimal contact with your skin and very low mass. My frames weigh 6 grams, with lenses they're 14 grams. The Meta Ray Bans are 50 grams. If you could make the frames from pure helium they still wouldn't feel close.
- isatty 1y agoWhy? If 1mm cross section titanium is just as or stronger why does it need to be thicker? For anchors?
- kube-system 1y agoBecause the electronics used in smart glasses go inside of the frames. It's not a structural problem, it's a packaging problem.
- LtdJorge 1y agoDoes sheet titanium not exist? I know it’s a tough metal, I don’t know if it would be feasible to make it out of folded sheet titanium. Edit: Just checked, it does exist.
- LtdJorge 1y agoEven if it’s an order of magnitude more expensive, they would make money on the glasses. Oakley (and every brand controlled by the Luxotica monopoly) glasses have extreme margins. On the order of, could be sold for under $20 making a profit but are sold for $300+. I don’t think the titanium work and the electronics can offset that.
- LorenDB 1y agoCome on, why would you make smart glasses with a clear shell and then hide the electronics behind an inner shielding layer? I want all the circuits on display.
- sodokuwizard 1y agoah yes to satisfy that world famous market of giga electronics nerds in oakleys
- longtimelistnr 1y agoWell i know this is sarcastic but have you seen the preferred design language of the Oakley founder? Exposed circuitry is righttt up his alley.
- luxuryballs 1y agoit sounds like he got in trouble for exposing his circuitry in public
- duped 1y agoLight can affect the operation of many electronics, it's just easier to not worry about it and enclose the entire thing. Some models of RPI had this problem.
- Anon1096 1y agoThere was a limited edition that was translucent so you could see inside pretty recently https://www.meta.com/blog/ray-ban-meta-coperni-limited-edition-debut/ https://www.meta.com/blog/ray-ban-meta-coperni-limited-editi... Believe if you worked at Meta when the glasses just came out there was also a limited fully transparent frame as well.
- nickthegreek 1y agoi have the ‘stone’ colorway which is semi transparent brown.
- sleepyguy 1y agoMy elderly mother-in-law is slowly going blind. She relies on Meta glasses to read print on everything — from the back of a can to the mail. She also uses them to help locate items around the house, whether it’s something on the counter or in the living room. I’ve tried the glasses myself, and I’m convinced that wearable eyewear like this will eventually replace the mobile phone. With ongoing advances in miniaturization, it’s only a matter of time before AR and AV are fully integrated into everyday wearables.
- gwbas1c 1y ago> and I’m convinced that wearable eyewear like this will eventually replace the mobile phone Once there is an actual usable in-glasses screen, I will agree. A few years ago I tried someone's smartglasses with a screen. It basically had similar functionality to my first Fitbit: it would show texts, notifications, caller ID. I really want one of those and went looking, but couldn't find it.
- ge96 1y agoWhat style was it, nreal (bulky) or something like Frame (though lower end in quality)
- themanmaran 1y agoYou might be interested in the EvenRealities G1 [1]. It's the absolute best form factor I've seen for just the text HUD https://www.evenrealities.com/ https://www.evenrealities.com/
- stickfigure 1y agoLooks amazing. Unfortunately from a Chinese company, and given how deeply integrated with my email, calendar, etc it would be... no interest.
- dontlaugh 1y agoDo you live in China? If not, why would you care? Meta, Microsoft, Apple, etc. are far more likely to snitch on you to the government you actually live under.
- luxuryballs 1y agoI was looking at the Ray-Ban version of these for a few minutes before I realized there’s no HUD… I wouldn’t even consider a dev kit for one of these unless I had some kind of ability to add a dragon ball scouter widget to show the power level on the lens…
- excalibur 1y agoIf that's what you want, you can find some pretty good deals on Google Glass on ebay.
- amazingamazing 1y agowon't buy these, or any others smart glasses until there's a way to replace the battery. I'm annoy'd enough that it's difficult to do with bluetooth headphones... with my quest 3 at least there's an option to plug it into an external battery, given the traditional use cases.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- Workaccount2 1y agoA side note, but it is very unfortunate luck that the pendulum of fashionable eye-wear has swung back towards 80's/90's style thin frame/no frame glasses. You really need young people to carry tech like this, and needing them to wear millennial fashion from 10 years ago so camera and compute fit will just make it that much harder.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- sandspar 1y agoGood point! These would have been a much easier sell when Warby Parker was for cool young people instead of for aging dads.
- paxys 1y agoWhy did Zuck think it was okay to post a photo of himself wearing them? Does he think his cool looks will drive sales? The little interest I had immediately disappeared after seeing it.
- some_random 1y agoDo you typically make your tech choices based on who they have modeling them in ads?
- Apocryphon 1y agoWell, when they’re wearables…
- 542354234235 1y agoThe entire history of advertising would indicate that a lot of people do make choices, especially fashion related, based on being modeled by beautiful famous people with established parasocial relationships with their audience.
- spiderice 1y agoWhether or not we want to admit it, people definitely make tech choices based off how cool the people in the ads look. To deny that would be to deny the effectiveness of marketing.
- freehorse 1y agoWell there is some reason that some people play in ads, and I don't.
- foxygen 1y agoWhat is wrong with it?
- mkoryak 1y agohes trying to show off his 100k watch
- tomhow 1y ago[Stub for offtopic-ness]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- micromacrofoot 1y ago[flagged]
- wmeredith 1y agoI like that they included a candid photo. The clothes I buy don't look the same on me as they do on a model, and I'm OK with that.
- micromacrofoot 1y agosure but there's a reason this kind of product is usually modeled, because candidly having cameras mounted on your head is a terribly awkward thing
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- oidar 1y ago[flagged]
- greesil 1y agoHow does AR help anything? What problems does AR solve? At least with face camera + Clearview I could become the world's greatest politician / bounty hunter. Actually nevermind I saw this sick demo on Reddit of an AR putting assistant but I think they had to strap a depth camera on the device. So AR means mini golf pro?
- make3 1y agoI don't think we should normalize pointing cameras at people's faces all the time. I hate these things.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- dynm 1y agoMaybe they have some light to show if they're on. But is everyone supposed to just know that? Pointing a video camera at everyone you talk to is an... interesting social choice. Glasses like these should be designed with a physical mechanisms to cover the cameras.
- robhlt 1y agoI agree. The white light these turn on when recording is not enough for the average person to realize recording is happening. I was visiting a museum yesterday and someone was using these to livestream/record their own (bad) tour. Security stopped someone doing this with their phone earlier, but had no idea what this guy was doing.
- neuralkoi 1y agoI agree completely with this comment, but I just want to point out that this cat's been out of the bag for at least the past 10 years. There's camera's everywhere at this point: every doorbell/garage, every store, every light on the street, even my friend's pet/baby monitors when I visit. I hate it.
- make3 1y agoit's not because everything sucks that we need to normalize making it worse
- paul7986 1y agoBased on the comments above this sentiment is going away vs. in Oct 2023 when i start evangelizing them I heard and saw a lot more of I hate these privacy nightmare stuff.
- jxjnskkzxxhx 1y ago[flagged]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- wiether 1y agoSo how do you prevent Meta from gathering secrets displayed for even a tenth of a second on an employee' screen? You'll have to ask security to check everyone's glasses now?
- wwweston 1y agoMeta isn’t the last company I’d trust with a wearable always on video input (among other data no doubt), but they’re in the bracket.
- smilespray 1y agoWho's worse? Palantir?
- testfrequency 1y agoYeah no kidding. Curious how someone could not rank Meta in dead last. Is the FBI last on your list or above Meta? At least in regard to Palantir you understand their business. Meta masquerades, hides, and cowers their shady practices behind consumer friendly products. Toxic lollipops labeled properly as toxic vs toxic lollipops labeled with a tiny * that requires consumer research. Which one do you think most people will reach for first?
- TheGRS 1y agoThe worst offender of giving my secrets away is still myself sadly.
- fnordpiglet 1y agoGoogle is the absolutely bottom of the pile. They’re literally nothing but a mass surveillance for money company.
- KennyBlanken 1y agoOr keep it from violating recording and privacy laws? How are these "smart glasses" legal in places like Germany where you (supposedly) can't even have a dashcam?
- Bender 1y agoThis is just my opinion but these look even worse that the 1940's+ military issued BC glasses. BC as in birth control. [1] At least it will be easy to spot the glassholes [2] for now at least. [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GI_glasses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GI_glasses [2] - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glassholes https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glassholes
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- RandallBrown 1y agoI think those glasses would be considered quite stylish today.
- ccppurcell 1y agoIn the 60s and 70s the NHS glasses (free or mostly free) were hated and a target for bullying etc. my mum had a couple of pairs, I wish she'd kept them because they were really cool by today's standards.
- oulipo 1y ago[flagged]
- sejje 1y agoSaw the picture with him wearing them, definitely checks out.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- redczar 1y ago[flagged]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- OkGoDoIt 1y agoStill no SDK though, what’s the point of smart glasses that only do what Meta lets them? I’m personally more excited about the Mentra Live glasses, which are fully programmable with AugmentOS.
- dkobia 1y agoThis. The meta glasses have so much potential and it is absolutely frustrating as a developer to have no way to make use of it.
- divan 1y agoWeird take: my biggest annoyance with Meta glasses after 1+ year of almost daily usage is that there is no way to switch from Meta AI to any other voice AI.
- msgodel 1y agoHah so they're actually worse than my $16 bluetooth headphones unless you actually need the camera.
- itsdrewmiller 1y ago…or the sunglasses.
- nickthegreek 1y agothey can be used to talk to any other ai. but you can’t easily activate it via voice/touch on the device. i’m unaware of any bt device that allows you to activate AI of choice.
- msgodel 1y agoThe bluetooth headphones I have on now have an assistant button. Supposedly it sends something like an HSP/AVRCP event to activate it although I haven't set any of that up since I'm on Linux.
- bravesoul2 1y agoNot a weird take. Just a shit product in that regard then.
- divan 1y agoBad explanation from my side. As generic headphones/mic they are perfect for chatting with ChatGPT in voice mode (that's how I use it most of the time, in fact). As comment above explained, they have their own "Hey Meta," listening feature and I would love to switch it to ChatGPT (or other voice AI). In a way, that's similar how you can't change iPhone/AirPods to stop responding to "Hey Siri" and trigger ChatGPT instead. So I still label my take as weird )
- kaycebasques 1y agoSo there's no AR aspect to the lens on any of these Meta-partnered smart sunglasses, right? I assumed that was standard on all of them. Naive, I know, because that would require some amazing hardware. But it does go to show that we're still far from the Star Trek future that other simpleton consumers like myself might be hoping for / expecting.
- woodrowbarlow 1y agoif by "AR" you mean 3d spatial environment mapping; correct, meta glasses don't have that. i would argue, though, that having integrated access to AI that can react to what the user is seeing is a form of digitally augmented reality.
- kaycebasques 1y agoVisual AR is what I meant, yes. Along the lines of the first paragraph of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_reality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_reality
- itsdrewmiller 1y agoThere is no screen at all on these - there are some other glasses in the market that have some visual aspect (not environment-aware but spatially aware enough to keep a virtual monitor in place). This one is the current market leader I believe: https://us.shop.xreal.com/products/xreal-one-pro?srsltid=AfmBOoo7K0--3_PSSx6LTXfEnGYmT4R4Sv4Bnw2xwAMaqPfJ4yWi22JW https://us.shop.xreal.com/products/xreal-one-pro?srsltid=Afm...
- rxtexit 1y agoNot that far, I think this is Meta Orion but it is still a little bit early. https://www.meta.com/emerging-tech/orion/ https://www.meta.com/emerging-tech/orion/
- dustbunny 1y agoI was stoked when I saw these headlines cause I generally prefer Oakley to Ray Ban in terms of style, but these look nothing like Oakley's! Personally I don't like round glasses, I like more square glasses. Dang!
- post_break 1y agoUntil they make it so you can replace the battery I'm not going to buy.
- kgilpin 1y agoI will miss being able to see people’s eyes.
- ipsum2 1y agoYou can get them non-tinted, probably many people do.
- Raed667 1y agoDoes it even matter if they have Oakley or any other logo on them? Aren't they all luxotica anyway?
- jekwoooooe 1y agoYes! Your 10$ and 600$ are made in the same place by the same company with largely the same materials. I discovered goodr recently and they are great. 25$ high quality sunglasses that I can actually trust have real UV ratings. Seeing people wear ray bans or oakleys is really funny
- kylehotchkiss 1y agoand when you inevitably lose your goodrs, nbd, just get another set for $25
- tsurba 1y agoThankfully in the EU you are not even allowed to sell sunglasses without proper UV protection, and can just pick up sunglasses from any market and trust they are fine, if a little flimsy. EDIT: ok apparently anywhere else than the poorest of countries, too, really.
- RandallBrown 1y agoSorta. Oakley makes a lot more than just sunglasses and as far as I know does plenty of R&D in house.
- KaiserPro 1y agoyou're correct it is luxotica all the way down. The difference is that oakley are sports glasses, which means that meta can now start sponsoring sports events, which they couldnt do with rayban. whats interesting, is that these glasses look normal, and not like the standard disphit magnets that oakley normally cater for
- toephu2 1y agoNo mention of weight in the article or on the official product page?
- noisy_boy 1y agoThat's why they were spamming me several times in the last few weeks to buy the ray ban ones - trying to clear inventory.
- oflannabhra 1y agoI would love some sunglasses for running that show some basic metrics (similar to my Apple Watch) for my workout, equivalent to the FORM Smart Swim 1 [0]. However, I would mostly prefer this to be a dumb screen, with all the smarts off loaded to a watch or phone. I'm not sure why companies keep insisting on building such smart glasses as independent products. [0] - https://www.formswim.com/products/smart-swim-goggles https://www.formswim.com/products/smart-swim-goggles
- femiagbabiaka 1y agoIn other hopefully unrelated news, the CTO of Meta just got sworn in as a Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army.
- 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 1y agoResist and bite
- onemoresoop 1y agoCool, now you'll have to charge your glasses every day? I really hope this won't become the norm where all people will literally be strapped to their devices 24/7 minus sleep time. Oh well, we sortof live in this world, everybody's scrolling through their feeds already on their smart phones already. The technology is cool though, too bad it's used to extract all our attention.
- nsxwolf 1y agoWe have other devices we are strapped to at sleep time to monitor our sleep data.
- divan 1y agoYou just put them into the case, similar how it is with Airpods.
- RandallBrown 1y ago> everybody's scrolling through their feeds already on their smart phones already It's kinda weird to me that this feels so dystopian. Before smartphones it's not like I was sitting there appreciating the world around me. I was just bored and unhappy. Now I'm paying my bills, watching funny videos, looking up interesting things about something I heard about earlier in the day, etc. But still, there's something off-putting about a group of strangers doing something mundane like waiting for a bus and staring at their phones the whole time.
- ccppurcell 1y agoIf you were unhappy before, I doubt smartphones have made you happier. They relieve boredom for sure but here's the kicker: boredom is good for you.
- RandallBrown 1y agoI'm not sure boredom is good for you. I think boredom will often lead your brain into doing things that are good for you, but just being bored doesn't seem like something beneficial to me. I'm not sure what I would gain by sitting in a doctor's office waiting for my appointment and being bored vs. sitting there with my phone reading/watching something. The problem (in my opinion) comes when you start replacing everything you do with just scrolling on your phone. Like if I'm bored at home I just scroll TikTok instead of playing a sport or learning a new skill.
- testfrequency 1y agoCute spyware. This is exactly why regardless of how breakthrough Meta makes their wearables, it will never reach full market potential as their brand will always be known as a privacy nightmare. Apple is going to win here if they can get the price right. VR I think most people can rationalize it as these headsets are used in very controlled states, like at home on the couch or living room - but for Meta to convince people to use this in their every day life..hard sell.
- next_xibalba 1y agoThis is a very “inside baseball” take. The average person just does not care at all about privacy from large corporations. It’s not even on their radar as a topic about which to have an opinion. I think the biggest hurdles to widespread adoption are ease of connectivity (getting pics and videos “out” of glasses and onto phone/laptop/cloud), ultra high def images, size of on device storage, and battery life. Those are tough, given the form factor. But, if cracked, these will be huge.
- tiahura 1y agoThe main concern of the average person is to not look like a dork. Second, is interoperability with the services upon which they rely. So, privacy concerns won't matter to most, but being trapped in a Meta garden will.
- sekai 1y ago> This is a very “inside baseball” take. The average person just does not care at all about privacy from large corporations Google Glass remembers…
- next_xibalba 1y agoYou’re claiming google glass failed bc of privacy concerns?
- GeekyBear 1y ago
- pfortuny 1y ago“Unable to play videos without cookies”. OK, Meta, I can see your game.
- edwardbernays 1y agoI think wearing smart glasses from any ad-tech surveillance company ought to be considered anti-social, and we should normalize ostracizing people who wear these in public. Want to wear them in your own home? Fine. Don't record me. This is now not just surveillance but sousveillance.
- penguin_booze 1y agoCame here to say exactly this. Someone wearing this in public should be considered as a brazen attempt to record others en masse without consent. In fact, it's worse because it's data being harvested for and siphoned to a third party, in real time, entirely for their enrichment. We already have enough mass surveillance devices. But I suppose two arguments could be made (1) we don't need more of these, or (2) peak surveillance has already been achieved, and adding one more doesn't make any difference.
- edwardbernays 1y agoI think this is a reasonable place to draw a bright, red line. It'll make us look unreasonable if we act unreasonably. What's really harming us is that we don't have a formalized value system from which to engage in rhetoric, nor do we have a standard rhetoric which people can easily engage from and against.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- loughnane 1y agoI had an interaction like this at Labcentral near MIT a few weeks ago. I was talking to this young kid for a minute before I realized he had those glasses on. I asked if those are cameras, he said yes. I asked if he’s recording he said now. I told him in any case I find it very off-putting to have cameras in my face and that I’m going to go. Shook his hand and that was it. I feel like that’s the right way to handle it. I’m sure I’ll need to keep doing it.
- aanet 1y agoI'm old enough to remember that the very first adopters of Google Glass were called glassh*les, and other terms of varying degrees of endearment, no thanks to the techbros who used them in showers / restrooms and such. What makes these FB glasses any different / special? Do they automagically obscure the views when in compromising positions? /sarc
- sejje 1y agoSociety accepting a total lack of privacy is what's changed
- kunzhi 1y agoI’m a 90s kid so there’s something poetic about Zuck choosing Oakley for this, feels on-brand for him. In my mind it was inevitable that we would reach this point. The novel Snow Crash predicted this exact phenomenon (along with the Metaverse, of course, which is where they are trying to drive this). It’s the same with companies issuing cryptocurrencies and the like. We aren’t totally locked in to the techno-feudal state just yet, but we’re getting there. Pretty fascinating how foreseeable these last many years and decades have been.
- username223 1y ago> Pretty fascinating how foreseeable these last many years and decades have been. It's a twisted kind of foresight, a lot like prophesies in ancient stories, that both predict the future and steer their subjects toward it. Neal Stephenson wrote books that appealed to (many, but not only) nerdy boys during their formative years. Lo and behold, 30 years later some of those boys have achieved wealth and power, and are trying to make random aspects of those books real. Keep that in mind if you ever write a YA novel...
- kunzhi 1y agoYeah it's odd. Was it a warning or a prophecy? Was it both? Hard to say I suppose.
- skhameneh 1y ago> choosing Oakley for this, feels on-brand I get the sentiment, but I really enjoyed the Oakley Flak series, the fit was superb. BUT, I hated the feeling that it was perceived as a statement rather than utility. I bought them originally for high field of vision and blocking glare when riding bikes. I lost a couple pairs and one got scratched really bad - and I don’t have a nice alternative in mind that fits a reasonable budget. *Am open to suggestions, I need ONE nice pair of polarized sunglasses that’l last.
- kunzhi 1y ago> I really enjoyed the Oakley Flak series, the fit was superb. Oh for sure, they were quite good, there was a real reason they became popular. But like you said, it got to be annoying that wearing Oakleys was a statement. (Plus, at least where I lived, they were part of the "douche uniform.") In terms of recommendations, I'm still getting lots of mileage out of my Ray-Ban Wayfarers, and they're polarized.
- toephu2 1y agoNotice how the weight isn't advertised anywhere on the product page.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- hyperadvanced 1y agoThese little freaks want us to surveil each other so bad. Anyone wearing these things instantly becomes a pariah outside of SV fantasy land
- mfkp 1y agoI'd like to thank Meta for permanently banning all of my accounts with no warning and no ability to appeal a few months ago. Now no need to waste money on these overpriced spy goggles.
- bravesoul2 1y agoBut what do they do? A: With Oakley Meta's glasses, you can: Capture high-quality video and photos hands-free with a built-in ultra-wide 12 MP camera. Listen to music, podcasts and more through Bluetooth speakers seamlessly integrated into the frames Make and take phone calls hands-free Live-stream your adventures, travels or daily life Use Meta AI for instant information and assistance – just say "Hey Meta". ---- If you don't need the camera then just use a smartwatch that does much more. Maybe get a camera wrapped to your forehead instead.
- ryandrake 1y agoI would almost buy one of these, but only if it could be used entirely offline, without a Meta account. We have enough things tethered to their manufacturer 24/7. This really shouldn't need to be one of them.
- akomtu 1y agoNext: Meta announces a smart wristwatch that you would put on your right hand.
- sandy_coyote 1y agoYou can always put your phone away in situations where it's not socially or administratively acceptable. But if you have prescription lenses or sun sensitivity, you need to leave these on. I can imagine there's gonna be some friction with adoption there.
- geor9e 1y agoI knew they were about to launch a new model, by how aggressively they were advertising the old stock at sale prices the last few weeks. I won't be buying it though - I tried talking to Meta AI in voice mode from my phone, and it's response to anything STEM related is basically "tee hee I'm just an AI I cant do that". My current assignee to my phone's AI hardware button is microsoft's. I assume it's an OpenAI model, but it lets you speed their voice up, which I value greatly.
- fnordpiglet 1y agoI have a rayban meta and ask it various questions on STEM (ex: what is entropic gravity). Its responses are brief but accurate. YMMV but it seems fine. However for detailed discussion I use the ChatGPT voice mode. The glasses are a pretty capable Bluetooth headset end to end. I often use it for this - a good head phone that doesn’t stuff up my ears. The built in AI I’ll use for things like “remember what level of the parking garage I am on” where it snaps a photo of the level number and I can ask later.
- geor9e 1y agoI don't mean a dictionary entry. I mean a STEM question that's novel enough that there might not be examples on the internet. All the other LLMs with voice mode will make good attempts to answer. I'm sure Meta's underlying LLM will too, but they added some guardrail. It's like their system prompt says pretend your IQ is 2 digits, or that it's impolite to try to solve engineering issues. Very Harrison Bergeron like. This trait alone makes me rank it as the worst on the market.
- busymom0 1y agoThese glasses don't look "Oakley" to me. Usually oakleys have a sporty look. These look like Ray Ban or childish. Also that pic of Zuck wearing them looks pretty ridiculous imo.
- black_13 1y ago[dead]
- v5v3 1y ago>The Meta Ray-Bans have sold over two million pairs to date Didnt realise there were that many social media pickup artists :-)